URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The Mighty Nuovo Falcone VOC
  HTML https://nuovofalcone.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Engine and Transmission
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 2358--------------------------------------------------
       Rocker Arm Shim Washers and Springs
       By: patentgeek Date: June 7, 2018, 8:47 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Paul Friday says:  "Both rockers have their end float taken-up
       by a spring with a shim washer on each side. Due to the thrust
       of the pushrods being in different directions, each rocker has
       the spring on a different end. The inlet rocker has the spring
       at the valve end, the exhaust rocker has it at the pushrod end."
       The rocker arm springs on both my intake and exhaust rocker arms
       are on the valve end.  When I dis-assembled the exhaust rocker
       arm to correct this, I discovered that the shim washers that go
       on either side of the spring don't fit the diameter of the
       rocker arm spindle on the pushrod end.  So it appears they can't
       be assembled per Paul Friday's instructions.
       I can't find any clarifying information in the English language
       Factory Riders Handbook or the Italian language Factory
       Maintenance Manual.  The Italian language Factory Parts Manual
       only shows one orientation for the rocker springs, on the
       pushrod end of the rocker arm.  However, I note the intake
       rocker arm shown in the Factory Parts Manual is shown reversed
       from its proper position, which doesn't give me a lot of
       confidence in that diagram as a reference.
       Thoughts?
       #Post#: 2359--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Rocker Arm Shim Washers and Springs
       By: patentgeek Date: June 8, 2018, 12:37 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I took another look at this with my spare rocker box, which is
       from a very early NF, and discovered that the washers can be
       configured to accommodate Paul Friday's recommended shim washer
       / spring configuration in my first post.  Although I questions
       the benefits of doing so (more on that below).
       There are (2) types of shim washers on the rocker arms: one type
       is thicker with a smaller inner diameter, the other type is
       thinner with a larger inner diameter.  Each rocker arm has (2)
       of the thinner/larger-ID shim washers and (1) of the
       thicker/smaller-ID shim washers.
       The thicker/smaller-ID shim washer only fits on the pushrod end
       of the rocker arm spindle closest to the oil feed.
       On the intake rocker arm, the (2) thinner/larger-ID shim washer
       are both used on the valve end of the rocker arm to sandwich the
       spring.  The thicker/smaller-ID shim washer fits on the pushrod
       end of the rocker arm, and acts as a thrust bearing (per Paul
       Friday).
       On the exhaust rocker arm, (1) thinner/larger-ID shim washer and
       (1) thicker/smaller-ID shim washer are used on the pushrod end
       of the rocker arm to sandwich the spring.  The second
       thinner/larger ID shim washer is used on the valve end of the
       rocker arm as a thrust bearing (per Paul Friday).
       intake rocker arm assembly
       thicker/smaller-ID washer ||| ROCKER ARM ||| thinner/larger-ID
       washer ||| spring ||| thinner/larger-ID washer
       exhaust rocker arm assembly
       thicker/smaller-ID washer ||| spring ||| thinner/larger-ID
       washer ||| ROCKER ARM ||| thinner/larger-ID washer
       On my spare rocker box assembly, I discovered that the exhaust
       rocker arm interferes with the rocker box aluminum casting if it
       is assembled with the spring and washers on the valve side.  But
       per the above, this rocker box is from a very early bike, and
       the rocker box on my later engine (in my bikes) does not have
       the same interference issue.
       So what does all of this mean?
       It seems odd to me that a thicker shim washer is being used as
       thrust bearing on the intake rocker, but that a thinner shim
       washer is being used as a thrust bearing on the exhaust rocker.
       #Post#: 2363--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Rocker Arm Shim Washers and Springs
       By: banquo Date: June 8, 2018, 3:48 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       They are supposed to go at opposite ends as per Paul's
       instructions, and the washers are different.
       Bear with me; I have some pix from when I had mine in bits.
       #Post#: 2364--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Rocker Arm Shim Washers and Springs
       By: banquo Date: June 8, 2018, 4:12 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hmmm. As always, you don't have the pic you really wish you had
       taken.
       Here are the parts as removed:
  HTML https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4761/39459892975_de45cc7192_z.jpg
  HTML https://flic.kr/p/237Wgqkrocker
       parts
  HTML https://flic.kr/p/237Wgqk
       by bancquo
  HTML https://www.flickr.com/photos/17279292@N03/,
       on Flickr
       Not very helpful, but you can see the springs sandwiched between
       two thrust washers. The blued washer is the thrust washer from
       the other end.
       So, on the inlet rocker, starting from the fat end, we have
       thrust, spring, thrust, rocker, blued washer, and the exhaust is
       the other way around.
       If yours was assembled with both springs at the same end, I
       imagine that the rockers wouldn't align properly with the valve
       stems.
       I don't seem to have a pic of the exhaust, but here's the
       assembly of the inlet, where you can see that I've identified
       the rocker, and where the spring goes (and proof that the new
       oil feed works, after kicking it over a few times after rebuild
       ;) ).
  HTML https://farm1.staticflickr.com/790/40131332335_70d564dba1_z.jpg
  HTML https://flic.kr/p/249gyX2oilfeed
       proof
  HTML https://flic.kr/p/249gyX2
       by bancquo
  HTML https://www.flickr.com/photos/17279292@N03/,
       on Flickr
       Hope that's some help
       #Post#: 2367--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Rocker Arm Shim Washers and Springs
       By: patentgeek Date: June 8, 2018, 2:21 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I took a picture of my spare rocker box assembly assembled per
       Paul Friday's recommendation:
  HTML https://1drv.ms/u/s!AuFSdkt2JFpfhqUJCoWRkZz9ARA-pQ
       What I find odd is: (1) none of the factory documentation
       indicates that the shim-washer/spring sandwich goes on opposite
       ends of the intake and exhaust rocker assembly, which seems
       pretty important for proper rocker/valve-stem alignment; and (2)
       that the thicker shim-washer is used as a thrust bearing on the
       intake rocker, but a thinner shim-washer is used as a thrust
       bearing on the exhaust rocker.
       The thicker shim-washer can't be used as a thrust bearing on the
       exhaust rocker because it has a smaller ID and won't fit on the
       "fat" section of the rocker arm spindle.
       Paul Friday's recommendation makes sense on the intake rocker,
       but it seems like a different combination of shim-washers would
       have been designed for the exhaust rocker so the thrust bearing
       shim-washer thickness was thicker.
       #Post#: 2370--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Rocker Arm Shim Washers and Springs
       By: patentgeek Date: June 8, 2018, 2:45 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Banquo, I found a pic of your rocker box here:
  HTML http://photobucket.com/gallery/user/bancquo/media/cGF0aDpDbGFzc2ljIEJpa2VzL0ZhbGNvbmUgRm9ydW0gU3R1ZmYvUGF1bCBGcmlkYXkgdXBsb2Fkcy9PdXRzaWRlX3pwczVhZGVmZjY5LmpwZw==/?ref=
       Note the pic is upside-down with the exhaust rocker on the top
       and the intake rocker on the bottom.
       Your pic shows a thicker shim-washer being used as a
       thrust-bearing on the fat (valve) end of the exhaust rocker
       spindle.  However, the inner diameter of my thicker shim-washers
       is too small to fit on the fat end of the spindle.
       #Post#: 2371--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Rocker Arm Shim Washers and Springs
       By: banquo Date: June 8, 2018, 3:47 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Sounds like you have the wrong washers then. It's unfortunate
       this came up after I'd put mine back together, as measurements
       aren't possible now, but they are definitely sided as Paul said,
       as mine was 'new' when delivered, and came like that. Whether or
       not it's important is another matter.
       #Post#: 2374--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Rocker Arm Shim Washers and Springs
       By: patentgeek Date: June 8, 2018, 3:55 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Yeah, maybe one of my thick shim-washers should have a larger
       ID.
       It shouldn't take long to reconfigure my exhaust rocker per the
       Paul Friday recommendation.  I remain surprised that this isn't
       documented in any of the Moto Guzzi manuals.
       #Post#: 2375--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Rocker Arm Shim Washers and Springs
       By: patentgeek Date: June 8, 2018, 4:32 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       More confusion in the factory parts manual. . . .
       The shim-washers (#31) on either side of the spring (#32) are
       described as "anello di spessore" which translates to "thick
       ring".  But these are actually the thin shim-washers.
       The shim-washer (#33) that sits opposite the shim-washer/spring
       sandwich is described as "anello appoggio bilancere" which
       translates to "balancing support ring".
       There are only two types of shim-washers identified in the
       factory parts manual.  But per the discussion above, since the
       intake rocker shim-washer configuration is the reverse of the
       exhaust rocker shim-washer configuration, the shim-washers
       acting as thrust bearings (i.e., balancing support rings) should
       have different diameters since one should sit on the fat end of
       the exhaust spindle and the other should fit on the skinny end
       of the intake spindle.  Which would require three types of
       shim-washers.
       Weird.
       #Post#: 2377--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Rocker Arm Shim Washers and Springs
       By: banquo Date: June 9, 2018, 2:36 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It's really frustrating that this didn't come up when I had all
       the parts to hand.
       I don't recall them being different diameters though.
       Kater or Huub will know, and maybe you'll get a response from
       the FB post.
       Advrider gets more traffic than here, and almost certainly will
       get a positive response
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page