URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       nomic
  HTML https://nomic.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Proposals and Voting
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 224--------------------------------------------------
       Proposal: Amend Rule S3.2.d.
       By: JamesSupreme Date: January 17, 2011, 8:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       To add:
       "All players, including lower players are allowed to vote."
       #Post#: 233--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Proposal: Amend Rule S3.2.d.
       By: iqforu Date: January 17, 2011, 10:21 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Against. I believe that the Supreme Nomic will function better
       if it only includes a representative from each nomic. They are
       the most competent and able voters, and I want nothing less in
       our Almighty Supreme Nomic.
       #Post#: 235--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Proposal: Amend Rule S3.2.d.
       By: JamesSupreme Date: January 17, 2011, 10:24 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I truthfully see that what will happen with this is it will
       allow the Supreme Nomic to come up with who is running and all
       players to vote on who will get the position.
       #Post#: 237--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Proposal: Amend Rule S3.2.d.
       By: iqforu Date: January 17, 2011, 10:32 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Let me retract my vote. Would this apply to all procedures of
       the Supreme Nomic (including voting on proposals) or solely
       elections?
       #Post#: 238--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Proposal: Amend Rule S3.2.d.
       By: JamesSupreme Date: January 17, 2011, 10:33 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Elections. That's what it's under.
       #Post#: 240--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Proposal: Amend Rule S3.2.d.
       By: iqforu Date: January 17, 2011, 10:34 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Then for. Maybe it will break our elections deadlock (aka,
       fighting over Tim's vote)
       #Post#: 251--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Proposal: Amend Rule S3.2.d.
       By: JamesSupreme Date: January 17, 2011, 12:51 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       K. I will add.
       #Post#: 253--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Proposal: Amend Rule S3.2.d.
       By: iqforu Date: January 17, 2011, 1:06 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hmm?
       #Post#: 255--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Proposal: Amend Rule S3.2.d.
       By: JamesSupreme Date: January 17, 2011, 1:07 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Add to the Supreme Nomic. Sorry.
       #Post#: 257--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Proposal: Amend Rule S3.2.d.
       By: iqforu Date: January 17, 2011, 1:08 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       We need Tim's vote?
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page