DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
NeoConfederate States fo AMerica
HTML https://ncsa.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Capitol Building
*****************************************************
#Post#: 9034--------------------------------------------------
Re: [BILL-IC] Interstate Travel Act
By: The Carolina Alliance Date: September 3, 2015, 9:30 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Which causes economic issues. The constitution is prohibiting
economic growth.
#Post#: 9037--------------------------------------------------
Re: [BILL-IC] Interstate Travel Act
By: Columbia Confederates Date: September 3, 2015, 9:34 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"As the Representative from Gondor says, this bill is a strict
violation of the constitution by forcing states to create
railways, airports, and roadways. That is our job, not the
federal governments. We in Columbia have our ways of trading and
that is to build railways between states we trade with, on our
own terms, and by using our many ports. Forcing us to create
certain things interacts with our culture, forces us in one
direction."
#Post#: 9042--------------------------------------------------
Re: [BILL-IC] Interstate Travel Act
By: The Carolina Alliance Date: September 3, 2015, 9:44 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
This is where I think the constitution values state's rights too
much. We can't let a piece of paper stand in the way of economic
growth! Even if it was optional, like the old railroad, this is
a great opportunity to prosper.
OOC: For those of you who don't get what a mean by old railroad,
I'll give you some info. You see, this isn't the only forum the
NCSA has had. We also had another forum, started about two years
ago. CSM left, (As usual), but we still had other
administrators. But it turned out that CSM was paying for it,
and so sometime last spring or summer, it was all gone. And
that's why we use a free forum!
#Post#: 9050--------------------------------------------------
Re: [BILL-IC] Interstate Travel Act
By: Caos Date: September 3, 2015, 10:16 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"Tell me where it says in the constitution that the government
cannot build roads to connect the states? The Constitution says
that all states are sovereign. But since when are we actually
harming your sovereignty? After all, you ARE on NCSA land. The
NCSA has the power to help the states. All of the states. To
connect them. Tell me where, then, it says that the NCSA cannot
build on state's lands. Tell me. Tell me what it is infringing.
And don't pull a blanket 'Sovereignty', because you're still
your own government. Nothing's changed. Except for maybe a
couple shiny new roads, making sure that you are connected. In
fact, your government's independence has not been harmed at
all!"
#Post#: 9065--------------------------------------------------
Re: [BILL-IC] Interstate Travel Act
By: Confederacy of Turkducken Date: September 3, 2015, 11:33 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
OOC: Am I still acting Speaker? Or have I been replaced?
"While the Confederate State of Turkducken has a strict
regulation on motor vehicles a similar project for the
construction of railways between my State and the Reich is
already in motion, I really think we need to reevaluate how much
we protect the constitution. It is our life blood, that which
gives our Confederacy validity and soverignity, but should it
impede our progress as a Nation? I for one think not." The
balding man wiped his forehead and took a glass of water. "If we
all weigh what is to gain from this, I feel as if we have more
to gain than to lose."
#Post#: 9068--------------------------------------------------
Re: [BILL-IC] Interstate Travel Act
By: diddyland Date: September 4, 2015, 4:00 am
---------------------------------------------------------
OOC: where you write "capitol", do you mean "capital"?
Cause that's 2 different things.
IC: Diddyland supports this bill. Nevertheless we want to make
clear, that on these roads, the state's traffic laws should be
respected, such as speed limits, or so. We, ourselves don't have
many laws on highways, not even a speed limit, but still feel
that the bill should include this to protect other states' laws.
Otherwise this would be an overreach.
But if states' traffic laws are respected, we fully support this
bill.
#Post#: 9072--------------------------------------------------
Re: [BILL-IC] Interstate Travel Act
By: Caos Date: September 4, 2015, 7:08 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"The bill is simply to make these roads, by putting a standard
size on them, as well as railways. You make the roads bigger,
add more if you want, or put different laws on them. We do not
mind. It is, after all, your state."
#Post#: 9075--------------------------------------------------
Re: [BILL-IC] Interstate Travel Act
By: Columbia Confederates Date: September 4, 2015, 8:19 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"Again we will not be voting on this bill, but we ask it be
revised to make these things optional not mandatory.
#Post#: 9076--------------------------------------------------
Re: [BILL-IC] Interstate Travel Act
By: Caos Date: September 4, 2015, 8:20 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"Then that's not a bill. No law should be optional. We, as
states, do not pick and chose which part of the law to follow.
Under your decision, I could just follow only what I feel like."
#Post#: 9193--------------------------------------------------
Re: [BILL-IC] Interstate Travel Act
By: Kejsarinna Diana Date: September 5, 2015, 11:29 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=diddyland link=topic=912.msg9068#msg9068
date=1441357229]
OOC: where you write "capitol", do you mean "capital"?
Cause that's 2 different things.
IC: Diddyland supports this bill. Nevertheless we want to make
clear, that on these roads, the state's traffic laws should be
respected, such as speed limits, or so. We, ourselves don't have
many laws on highways, not even a speed limit, but still feel
that the bill should include this to protect other states' laws.
Otherwise this would be an overreach.
But if states' traffic laws are respected, we fully support this
bill.
[/quote]
OOC: capital (typo :P sorry I'll fix it)
*****************************************************
DIR Next Page