DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
NeoConfederate States fo AMerica
HTML https://ncsa.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Capitol Building
*****************************************************
#Post#: 7575--------------------------------------------------
[IC-Bill] Confederate Compromise (An Immoral Compromise) Locked
By: Confederacy of Turkducken Date: August 22, 2015, 6:43 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
The Author has withdrawn this piece of legislature.
#Post#: 7580--------------------------------------------------
Re: [IC-Bill] Confederate Compromise (An Immoral Compromise)
By: The Carolina Alliance Date: August 22, 2015, 6:48 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I think that's a good idea. Everybody can become a state and be
a part of the NCSA, but you don't have to be a part of the
government. That way states like Columbia can have what he wants
without having a giant war about it. (Not sure about giant, i
think if he didn't accept Gondor's offer the arrival of my tanks
would be his demise. But that isn't the point.)
#Post#: 7582--------------------------------------------------
Re: [IC-Bill] Confederate Compromise (An Immoral Compromise)
By: diddyland Date: August 22, 2015, 6:49 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I second this bill.
OOC: Man, I absolutely love it!
#Post#: 7588--------------------------------------------------
Re: [IC-Bill] Confederate Compromise (An Immoral Compromise)
By: Anthony Kaiser Date: August 22, 2015, 6:52 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I don't support this.
#Post#: 7591--------------------------------------------------
Re: [IC-Bill] Confederate Compromise (An Immoral Compromise)
By: The Carolina Alliance Date: August 22, 2015, 6:54 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I don't think there's much to discuss here. It's perfect. I'm
giving a little time to discuss it, in case anybody opposes, but
I'm ready to motion for a vote any time now.
#Post#: 7595--------------------------------------------------
Re: [IC-Bill] Confederate Compromise (An Immoral Compromise)
By: Anthony Kaiser Date: August 22, 2015, 6:55 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I think I just said I opposed this bill.
#Post#: 7600--------------------------------------------------
Re: [IC-Bill] Confederate Compromise (An Immoral Compromise)
By: The Carolina Alliance Date: August 22, 2015, 6:58 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I was about to post then you beat me to it.
#Post#: 7602--------------------------------------------------
Re: [IC-Bill] Confederate Compromise (An Immoral Compromise)
By: Columbia Confederates Date: August 22, 2015, 7:00 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Jag McCartney was infuriated "You want us to move our people to
a new land! NO! We came back to fix the constitution not have
you push us out! We object."
#Post#: 7605--------------------------------------------------
Re: [IC-Bill] Confederate Compromise (An Immoral Compromise)
By: The Carolina Alliance Date: August 22, 2015, 7:03 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
But some people don't like your "fixed" constitution. You want a
different constitution? You can move and make your own. You want
to amend the constitution? You can stay and we can discuss it.
Never did we say you had to leave. We just thought you would
want to. We stand corrected, there's no reason to raise your
voice over it.
#Post#: 7607--------------------------------------------------
Re: [IC-Bill] Confederate Compromise (An Immoral Compromise)
By: diddyland Date: August 22, 2015, 7:04 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
If Columbia doesn't want to move, which I completely understand,
then we can just have this compromise without the geographical
limitations. Every state would just say, if they want to be
independent or not.
New states however, could be bound by the geographical rule that
was proposed.
*****************************************************
DIR Next Page