DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
NeoConfederate States fo AMerica
HTML https://ncsa.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Supreme Court
*****************************************************
#Post#: 7459--------------------------------------------------
Re: OOC Case: NCSA vs. Caos
By: Kejsarinna Diana Date: August 22, 2015, 12:55 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I'm not taking sides in this case.
#Post#: 7460--------------------------------------------------
Re: OOC Case: NCSA vs. Caos
By: West Phoenicia Date: August 22, 2015, 12:56 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"I don't see any vulgarity that was used by Caos. As someone who
has been on the forum for a long time he should have stopped
when Sparta the AG requested it.
I see no cause for him to be suspended. Just reminded when the
AG says stop. Just stop.
#Post#: 7461--------------------------------------------------
Re: OOC Case: NCSA vs. Caos
By: Heavenly Paradise Date: August 22, 2015, 12:57 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"I side with the West Phoenician justice. No suspension."
#Post#: 7464--------------------------------------------------
Re: OOC Case: NCSA vs. Caos
By: Sparta Date: August 22, 2015, 12:58 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
The vulgarity My Honor was when the defense put an improper word
down. The point in case is *****d. Even if the computer
programming blocks it out, it is still there and is vulgar.
#Post#: 7470--------------------------------------------------
Re: OOC Case: NCSA vs. Caos
By: Caos Date: August 22, 2015, 1:01 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Not true.
Cockpit, pissed. They are not swear words. Yet they are blocked
out.
#Post#: 7471--------------------------------------------------
Re: OOC Case: NCSA vs. Caos
By: West Phoenicia Date: August 22, 2015, 1:01 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"I am re reading it over and over. What word am I missing?"
#Post#: 7475--------------------------------------------------
Re: OOC Case: NCSA vs. Caos
By: Sparta Date: August 22, 2015, 1:05 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"They are blocked out because they have words that are
considered profanity in it.
Your Honor the thread, Columbia against DEN."
#Post#: 7477--------------------------------------------------
Re: OOC Case: NCSA vs. Caos
By: West Phoenicia Date: August 22, 2015, 1:08 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"Usually if someone is blocked out I would see *** I dont see
any of that. Can anyone else see?"
#Post#: 7559--------------------------------------------------
Re: OOC Case: NCSA vs. Caos
By: diddyland Date: August 22, 2015, 6:15 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Caos might have an aggressive way of writing stuff, but he does
not use vulgar language. At least, not in the evidence presented
to us. Therefore, if my colleague judges agree, Caos is not
guilty.
#Post#: 7646--------------------------------------------------
Re: OOC Case: NCSA vs. Caos
By: West Phoenicia Date: August 22, 2015, 8:42 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Yes I have to concur in THIS instance I have not seen it.
As for not listening to the AG, yes that he did ignore.
*****************************************************
DIR Next Page