DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
NeoConfederate States fo AMerica
HTML https://ncsa.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Capitol Building
*****************************************************
#Post#: 7202--------------------------------------------------
Re: [IC/OOC- Judicial Procedures for the Supreme Court]
DIR By: Aquatur
Date: August 21, 2015, 5:41 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Article VI
Interim Judges
A. If there shall be a member to any party of a case that is
also a Justice, an interim Justice shall be chosen to prevent
bias in the proceedings of the court.
B. The interim judge shall be appointed by the Chief Justice
with the consent of the other justice.
C. If this be the case with more than one justice, then the
President shall appoint two interim justices with the Consent of
Congress
"Given the sometimes slow nature on Congress, it may be
beneficial, in order to uphold the accused's right of a speedy
trial, to amend the section to allow for the President to
appoint such interim justices and if the Congress deems so, they
can Constitutionally, 'by law, vest the appointment of such
inferior officers, as they think proper..'"
#Post#: 7203--------------------------------------------------
Re: [IC/OOC- Judicial Procedures for the Supreme Court]
DIR By: Heavenly Paradise
Date: August 21, 2015, 8:12 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"The bill has been edited to your desires, my colleague from
Byzantium."
#Post#: 7206--------------------------------------------------
Re: [IC/OOC- Judicial Procedures for the Supreme Court]
DIR By: West Phoenicia
Date: August 21, 2015, 10:14 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"Does this bill enable the Defence of Prosecution to ask that a
Justice who may be an ally with one of the parties to excuse
themselves from the case also?"
#Post#: 7209--------------------------------------------------
Re: [IC/OOC- Judicial Procedures for the Supreme Court]
DIR By: Heavenly Paradise
Date: August 21, 2015, 10:42 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"The justice's political affiliations are not the problem.
Everyone has them and that's a fact of life."
#Post#: 7210--------------------------------------------------
Re: [IC/OOC- Judicial Procedures for the Supreme Court]
DIR By: Aquatur
Date: August 21, 2015, 10:47 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Gondor link ---
>
> "The justice's political affiliations are not the problem.
Everyone has them and that's a fact of life."
>
--- End Quote ---
"What I believe the Representative is trying to say, is that can
the Prosecution or Defense petition the Court, with enough
evidence or valid reasoning to remove a Justice from sitting on
a case... Do they have such right?"
#Post#: 7211--------------------------------------------------
Re: [IC/OOC- Judicial Procedures for the Supreme Court]
DIR By: Heavenly Paradise
Date: August 21, 2015, 10:48 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"Not yet. That is not particularly mentioned in this bill, but I
can amend it to be so."
#Post#: 7212--------------------------------------------------
Re: [IC/OOC- Judicial Procedures for the Supreme Court]
DIR By: Aquatur
Date: August 21, 2015, 10:55 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"I thank the Member from Gondor for his quick and speedy reply.
I defer to the opinion of the Representative from West Phonecia
for her opinion on the matter."
#Post#: 7266--------------------------------------------------
Re: [IC/OOC- Judicial Procedures for the Supreme Court]
DIR By: West Phoenicia
Date: August 22, 2015, 4:48 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"We thank the Eastern Byzantine Empire for making our point more
clear. If you shall amend this. We would be willing to support
such bill."
#Post#: 7433--------------------------------------------------
Re: [IC/OOC- Judicial Procedures for the Supreme Court]
DIR By: Heavenly Paradise
Date: August 22, 2015, 12:41 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"Your amendment has been added."
#Post#: 7435--------------------------------------------------
Re: [IC/OOC- Judicial Procedures for the Supreme Court]
DIR By: Confederacy of Turkducken
Date: August 22, 2015, 12:42 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"Unless Congress would like voting to resume now, the time
expires in 4 hours."
*****************************************************
Page 6 of 8
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page