URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       NeoConfederate States fo AMerica
  HTML https://ncsa.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Capitol Building
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 7202--------------------------------------------------
       Re: [IC/OOC- Judicial Procedures for the Supreme Court]
       By: Aquatur Date: August 21, 2015, 5:41 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Article VI
       Interim Judges
       A. If there shall be a member to any party of a case that is
       also a Justice, an interim Justice shall be chosen to prevent
       bias in the proceedings of the court.
       B. The interim judge shall be appointed by the Chief Justice
       with the consent of the other justice.
       C. If this be the case with more than one justice, then the
       President shall appoint two interim justices with the Consent of
       Congress
       "Given the sometimes slow nature on Congress, it may be
       beneficial, in order to uphold the accused's right of a speedy
       trial, to amend the section to allow for the President to
       appoint such interim justices and if the Congress deems so, they
       can Constitutionally, 'by law, vest the appointment of such
       inferior officers, as they think proper..'"
       #Post#: 7203--------------------------------------------------
       Re: [IC/OOC- Judicial Procedures for the Supreme Court]
       By: Heavenly Paradise Date: August 21, 2015, 8:12 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "The bill has been edited to your desires, my colleague from
       Byzantium."
       #Post#: 7206--------------------------------------------------
       Re: [IC/OOC- Judicial Procedures for the Supreme Court]
       By: West Phoenicia Date: August 21, 2015, 10:14 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "Does this bill enable the Defence of  Prosecution to ask that a
       Justice who may be an ally with one of the parties to excuse
       themselves from the case also?"
       #Post#: 7209--------------------------------------------------
       Re: [IC/OOC- Judicial Procedures for the Supreme Court]
       By: Heavenly Paradise Date: August 21, 2015, 10:42 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "The justice's political affiliations are not the problem.
       Everyone has them and that's a fact of life."
       #Post#: 7210--------------------------------------------------
       Re: [IC/OOC- Judicial Procedures for the Supreme Court]
       By: Aquatur Date: August 21, 2015, 10:47 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Gondor link=topic=747.msg7209#msg7209
       date=1440214960]
       "The justice's political affiliations are not the problem.
       Everyone has them and that's a fact of life."
       [/quote]
       "What I believe the Representative is trying to say, is that can
       the Prosecution or Defense petition the Court, with enough
       evidence or valid reasoning to remove a Justice from sitting on
       a case... Do they have such right?"
       #Post#: 7211--------------------------------------------------
       Re: [IC/OOC- Judicial Procedures for the Supreme Court]
       By: Heavenly Paradise Date: August 21, 2015, 10:48 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "Not yet. That is not particularly mentioned in this bill, but I
       can amend it to be so."
       #Post#: 7212--------------------------------------------------
       Re: [IC/OOC- Judicial Procedures for the Supreme Court]
       By: Aquatur Date: August 21, 2015, 10:55 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "I thank the Member from Gondor for his quick and speedy reply.
       I defer to the opinion of the Representative from West Phonecia
       for her opinion on the matter."
       #Post#: 7266--------------------------------------------------
       Re: [IC/OOC- Judicial Procedures for the Supreme Court]
       By: West Phoenicia Date: August 22, 2015, 4:48 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "We thank the Eastern Byzantine Empire for making our point more
       clear. If you shall amend this. We would be willing to support
       such bill."
       #Post#: 7433--------------------------------------------------
       Re: [IC/OOC- Judicial Procedures for the Supreme Court]
       By: Heavenly Paradise Date: August 22, 2015, 12:41 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "Your amendment has been added."
       #Post#: 7435--------------------------------------------------
       Re: [IC/OOC- Judicial Procedures for the Supreme Court]
       By: Confederacy of Turkducken Date: August 22, 2015, 12:42 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "Unless Congress would like voting to resume now, the time
       expires in 4 hours."
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page