URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       NeoConfederate States fo AMerica
  HTML https://ncsa.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Capitol Building
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 6942--------------------------------------------------
       Re: [IC/OOC- Judicial Procedures for the Supreme Court]
       By: Confederacy of Turkducken Date: August 18, 2015, 6:15 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "I-I apologize for the outburst Representative, but until the
       Congress votes to ban filibustering it will be upheld in this
       Congress, while I recognize that filibustering may waste
       valuable time to Congress, if we really respect the freedom of
       speech we have to recognize the right to do this. All of you may
       know the tested opinion that filibustering protects minority or
       unpopular opinions. I myself finds this to be true."
       #Post#: 6946--------------------------------------------------
       Re: [IC/OOC- Judicial Procedures for the Supreme Court]
       By: Aquatur Date: August 18, 2015, 6:24 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Confederacy of Turkducken
       link=topic=747.msg6933#msg6933 date=1439938444]
       "While it seems likely that the bill would be defeated,
       Representative Barona makes a point, however in my
       hu-hurriedness to fulfill my duties I overlooked that important
       notice the Represebtative from Byzantium made. The
       Representative from Byzantine is correct, however for fairness
       the vote will continue."
       [/quote]
       OOC: ...That doesn't really make sense at all. Surely, since
       there was no previous second the vote would be null.
       #Post#: 6954--------------------------------------------------
       Re: [IC/OOC- Judicial Procedures for the Supreme Court]
       By: Caos Date: August 18, 2015, 6:37 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       OOC: There WAS no second to table...
       IC: I second this bill, and motion to vote.
       #Post#: 6955--------------------------------------------------
       Re: [IC/OOC- Judicial Procedures for the Supreme Court]
       By: Aquatur Date: August 18, 2015, 6:41 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Caos link=topic=747.msg6954#msg6954
       date=1439941079]
       OOC: There WAS no second to table...
       IC: I second this bill, and motion to vote.
       [/quote]
       OOC: Well that and the motion was made before an actual second
       was made on the bill.
       #Post#: 6956--------------------------------------------------
       Re: [IC/OOC- Judicial Procedures for the Supreme Court]
       By: Confederacy of Turkducken Date: August 18, 2015, 6:45 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       OOC: I understand the objections to the current vote, I
       overlooked that important notice, but I already started the vote
       for tabling, I was trying to just go with my gaffe to be fair to
       WP. If we want to ignore that vote and rewind to start the
       approval voting let me know.
       #Post#: 6963--------------------------------------------------
       Re: [IC/OOC- Judicial Procedures for the Supreme Court]
       By: West Phoenicia Date: August 18, 2015, 7:57 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Can the state of DEN not try to rush through a bill Mr Speaker.
       Occ. Sneaky get it passed while someone is working. Is messed
       up.
       #Post#: 6964--------------------------------------------------
       Re: [IC/OOC- Judicial Procedures for the Supreme Court]
       By: Confederacy of Turkducken Date: August 18, 2015, 7:59 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       OOC: I made a gaffe with the voting process, besides their is a
       24 period on the voting time, plenty enough for one word
       responses. I'm trying to do my job effectively and expediently.
       #Post#: 7014--------------------------------------------------
       Re: [IC/OOC- Judicial Procedures for the Supreme Court]
       By: West Phoenicia Date: August 18, 2015, 10:44 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Occ. Ur doing fine Turkdurken.   People just need to let the
       motion move forward. Otherwise someone will
       Second the bill and a call to table will just need to be called
       again.  Extending the time.
       #Post#: 7066--------------------------------------------------
       Re: [IC/OOC- Judicial Procedures for the Supreme Court]
       By: Confederacy of Turkducken Date: August 19, 2015, 2:28 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "Th-The twenty-four hour period of waiting is almost over, any
       remaining votes or comments must be made in this three hour
       period."
       #Post#: 7082--------------------------------------------------
       Re: [IC/OOC- Judicial Procedures for the Supreme Court]
       By: Confederacy of Turkducken Date: August 19, 2015, 6:17 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       OOC: Oh...I saw the mistake I made when I commented earlier, my
       bad didn't mean to say it would be tabled.
       "The voting period is over!" The Soeaker feebly yelled, "This
       bill is not to be tabled by popular vote, and a new vote will
       occur for this bill to be passed into la-la-la-la-law." He
       looked a bit queasy, "A-Ayes and N-Nays please."
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page