DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
NeoConfederate States fo AMerica
HTML https://ncsa.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Capitol Building
*****************************************************
#Post#: 4815--------------------------------------------------
Re: [Bill-IC] The Nuclear Weapons Proliferation Act
By: Heavenly Paradise Date: July 20, 2015, 7:47 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"However, Militias can be run by states, and the Constitution
says that the right to keep and bear arms is necessary for the
security of a free state. So then, why wouldn't the states be
entitled to running their own militias, as they are sovereign
entities within this Confederacy? Might I also point out Article
I, Section 5 of the Constitution, which states, and I quote,
"All powers not prohibited to the states nor delegated to the
NeoConfederate States are reserved to the States respectively."
Might I point out that States are not prohibited from developing
any kinds of weapons, nor is it delegated to the NeoConfederate
States to ban nuclear weapons. I also will point out that if we
are making the arguments as to who owns the weapons of Gondor,
specifically nuclear weapons, they essentially belong to the
people. It was their tax dollars that went into military
projects, thereby creating a monetary connection from the
citizens to the armaments. The people also make up the armed
forces, and guard our weapons around the clock. They financed
these weapons, and protect them on a daily basis. Through this
bill, I hope to achieve a sense of teamwork within the states
because we will be preventing the arbitrary spread of nuclear
weapons, and banding together for the common defense, and
preservation of these great NeoConfederate States."
#Post#: 4821--------------------------------------------------
Re: [Bill-IC] The Nuclear Weapons Proliferation Act
By: SomemuttupNorth Date: July 20, 2015, 9:03 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"Hear hear to the Gondorian representative. We couldn't have
said better."
#Post#: 4822--------------------------------------------------
Re: [Bill-IC] The Nuclear Weapons Proliferation Act
By: Heavenly Paradise Date: July 20, 2015, 9:16 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"And to address the point made by my honorable colleague from
the Eastern Byzantine Empire, I do believe that the modern
definition that you gave for a militia is actually what it has
been since the time of the War of Northern Aggression. For
example, the Missouri State Guard was formed in 1861 to protect
Missouri and fight alongside the NeoConfederacy, even before our
Constitution was written. It is therefore that militias
controlled and headed up by the states have been a part of our
history since this nation's inception. Militias weren't a bunch
of farmers protecting small towns back then, they were groups of
people from all different backgrounds and occupations that
banded together to protect their homes. It should be no
different now."
#Post#: 4826--------------------------------------------------
Re: [Bill-IC] The Nuclear Weapons Proliferation Act
By: Amerikanisches Reich Date: July 21, 2015, 12:37 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Hanna zur Linde stands and clears her throat loudly:
"All this talk of a right to bear arms, and how it ought to be
interpreted, is a tangent and -- how do you say? -- a red
herring. The measure at hand concerns trade and the exchange of
goods or intellectual property in general between the States,
not conduct within the States.
As such, to put it as succinctly as possible, it does not
prohibit the development or production of nuclear weapons by
anyone, nor even their use. It is not a particularly strong bill
and I must admit I am surprised at the vehemence with which
certain members of this House have jumped to defend their right
to arm themselves, or for their citizens to be armed, when it is
not at all at issue.
It is, in other words, a trade bill, which happens to be
concerned with weapons, and this Congress does have the power to
regulate interstate trade, as I understand.
And on that point I move for a vote."
Representative zur Linde sits with a baffled expression, quite
unable to comprehend how she should find herself taking a
moderate stance on anything.
#Post#: 4827--------------------------------------------------
Re: [Bill-IC] The Nuclear Weapons Proliferation Act
By: Confederacy of Turkducken Date: July 21, 2015, 12:59 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"Although Representative zur Linde is not known for being a
moderate, I think we should take light of this outspokenness
from her and to objectively justify what we are discussing, I
second the vote. Mr. Speaker it is know to you."
#Post#: 4829--------------------------------------------------
Re: [Bill-IC] The Nuclear Weapons Proliferation Act
By: West Phoenicia Date: July 21, 2015, 4:00 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"The nation of Ravkan Bluffs representative had already called
for the Bill to be tabled. And I as the representative f4om West
Phoenicia have seconded the motion to table this dud of a bill."
#Post#: 4834--------------------------------------------------
Re: [Bill-IC] The Nuclear Weapons Proliferation Act
By: david090366 Date: July 21, 2015, 7:29 am
---------------------------------------------------------
The Speaker bangs his gavel loudly, "We will take motions in
order. The motion to table has been made and seconded, all those
in favor of tabling this bill please signify with an aye, those
opposed with a nay."
#Post#: 4838--------------------------------------------------
Re: [Bill-IC] The Nuclear Weapons Proliferation Act
By: Columbia Confederates Date: July 21, 2015, 8:02 am
---------------------------------------------------------
NAY!
#Post#: 4839--------------------------------------------------
Re: [Bill-IC] The Nuclear Weapons Proliferation Act
By: Heavenly Paradise Date: July 21, 2015, 9:31 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"I clearly defined what trade is within this bill. And I made it
a point to say that the distribution of nuclear weapons and
their schematics is not trade, but proliferation. So I'm not
regulating what trade is, I am regulating what it isn't, in the
most simple and logical sense. All being said, I vote nay ."
#Post#: 4843--------------------------------------------------
Re: [Bill-IC] The Nuclear Weapons Proliferation Act
By: SomemuttupNorth Date: July 21, 2015, 11:32 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Aye
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page