URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       NeoConfederate States fo AMerica
  HTML https://ncsa.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Office of the President
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 3143--------------------------------------------------
       Re: NCSA military plan
       By: david090366 Date: July 3, 2015, 3:04 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       St. Louis Motor Company Defense Division would like to offer our
       Boxer family of modular vehicles. These vehicles can literally
       be changed in the field with various modules that serve mission
       specific purposes.
       The base vehicle is independent of the modules, and modules can
       be interchanged within an hour. Each module incorporates a
       primary safety cell with a triple floor.
       The basic vehicle shell is composed of hard steel, and "modular
       armour" is sandwiched between it and the vehicle cell. The three
       elements are held together by fastening bolts. The modular
       armour, currently, is a specialized ceramic mix, but future
       versions of the armour can be easily fitted to the vehicle by
       slab replacement. The hull protects against top attack bomblets
       and anti-personnel mines, including suspended seats to improve
       crew protection from explosions below the vehicle. The vehicle
       is outfitted with advanced thermal, radar, and acoustic stealth
       technology.
  HTML http://i.imgur.com/jg4cZA6.jpg
       There are currently modules for
       [list]
       [li]Armoured personnel carrier[/li]
       [list]
       [li] 40mm automatic grenade launcher (Heckler & Koch GMG) or
       12.7 mm heavy machine gun (M3M)[/li]
       [/list]
       [li]120mm mortar carrier[/li]
       [li]Command Post[/li]
       [li]Ambulance[/li]
       [li]Battle damage repair[/li]
       [li]Logistics[/li]
       [li]155 mm Artillery Gun[/li]
       [/list]
       We are currently developing an Infantry Fighting Vehicle Module
       with the following features
       [list]
       [li]Stabilized MK30-2/ABM automatic cannon (cal. 30 mm x 173) –
       other weapons can be integrated as well[/li]
       [li]7.62mm MG3 coaxial machine gun and/or MAG, MG4 or other
       machine gun[/li]
       [li]Spike LR anti-tank guided missile[/li]
       [li]6-shot 76 mm grenade launcher[/li]
       [li]Elevation: -10° to +45°[/li]
       [li]Azimuth: precise, high-speed 360° traverse[/li]
       [/list]
       #Post#: 3182--------------------------------------------------
       Re: NCSA military plan
       By: Amerikanisches Reich Date: July 3, 2015, 3:08 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       For the Reich's formal submission for the anti-tank rocket
       requirement, we humbly offer the Panzerfaust III B:
  HTML http://s1.postimg.org/8y02hljof/Ar_Weapons_Panzerfaust3.jpg
       Weight: 25 lbs unloaded (launch tube fixed); 34 lbs loaded with
       tandem shaped charge warhead
       Length: 3'11"
       Caliber: 60mm barrel; 110mm warhead diameter
       Muzzle velocity: 500 ft/s
       Maximum projectile velocity: 722 ft/s
       Action: Propellant charge ignited by primer and firing pin
       Feed: Manual
       Magazine: None
       Maximum firing range: 920m
       Effective range (accounting for accuracy): 600m
       Penetration: ~900mm RHA equivalent (most modern composite armor
       is rated ~800mm RHA equivalent -- at least on facings other than
       front)
       Effective rate of fire: 5 rounds/minute
       Features: Telescopic sight with thermal IR and night vision
       capability; computer-assisted targeting (tracking); tandem
       charge warheads detonate and neutralize explosive-reactive armor
       (ERA) before main charge impacts the target; can be fired in
       enclosed spaces due to minimal backblast -- booster propellant
       fires the rocket clear before rocket motor properly ignites, and
       tubes are designed to exploit recoilless counter-mass;
       disposable launch tubes good for up to five launches each.
       #Post#: 3184--------------------------------------------------
       Re: NCSA military plan
       By: Caos Date: July 3, 2015, 3:49 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Can a 120 mm version of the Panzerfaust III B be made, with a 75
       mm barrel? In addition, can it be made into a guided version as
       well?
       Also, for the modular carrier, can a module for the T-4's MBT
       turret be made as well?
       #Post#: 3200--------------------------------------------------
       Re: NCSA military plan
       By: Amerikanisches Reich Date: July 3, 2015, 8:52 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Engineers from Rheinmetall state that increasing the caliber and
       the size of the projectile would certainly be possible, and not
       difficult, except in the sense that the manufacturing equipment
       would need to be altered. However, this would of course increase
       the weight of the launch tube and ammunition both, which could
       make the weapon excessively cumbersome. Also, it is likely that
       range and accuracy could suffer. Of course, penetrative
       capability would increase.
       For a guidance system, such as wire-guidance, the design would
       need to be fundamentally altered, and the result would likely be
       vastly less portable, even if an individual could technically
       carry it -- it likely would have to be fired when set up on a
       tripod as well. Tests of passive guidance systems, such as IR
       guidance, have been disappointing in the case of anti-armor
       weapons -- targets on the ground are not acquired with near the
       ease of aircraft, and enemy armor not running engines (e.g.
       lying in ambush) is often not acquired by passive systems at
       all.
       #Post#: 3202--------------------------------------------------
       Re: NCSA military plan
       By: Caos Date: July 3, 2015, 9:27 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The idea of a 120 mm version that is guided is so that it may be
       used as a guided missile for a tank cannon, or for a jeep.
       However, as an unguided weapon, it is fine. As for the launcher,
       what other weapons does it fire?
       #Post#: 3240--------------------------------------------------
       Re: NCSA military plan
       By: SomemuttupNorth Date: July 5, 2015, 12:16 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Enduranca offers the Heeler Orion as a transport (able to carry
       ten via cabin, bed, and gunner configuration) 12.7mm gun
       housing, Kevlar padding in addition to light steel.
       Also offered are several hundred M16A1 assault rifles, as well
       as the M72 LAW launcher, and cruise missiles able to be fired
       from aircraft, launcher, ship or submarine.
       #Post#: 3243--------------------------------------------------
       Re: NCSA military plan
       By: david090366 Date: July 5, 2015, 1:40 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I assume you are looking for something in this vein, perhaps as
       a wheeled tank destroyer. However, I've googled over and over
       and can't find a T-4 main battle tank. I'm assuming it's of
       Russian/USSR origin?
       [img]
  HTML http://i.imgur.com/NoqHndF.jpg?1[/img]
       #Post#: 3270--------------------------------------------------
       Re: NCSA military plan
       By: Caos Date: July 5, 2015, 11:08 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The T-4 is my design. XD
       #Post#: 3279--------------------------------------------------
       Re: NCSA military plan
       By: Amerikanisches Reich Date: July 5, 2015, 4:20 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Caos link=topic=371.msg3202#msg3202
       date=1435976862]
       The idea of a 120 mm version that is guided is so that it may be
       used as a guided missile for a tank cannon, or for a jeep.
       However, as an unguided weapon, it is fine. As for the launcher,
       what other weapons does it fire?
       [/quote]
       The main alternative is the "bunkerfaust" round, which is larger
       (though not in diameter), and carries more explosive, but lacks
       the penetration of the standard panzerfaust round against steel
       and composite armor. It is however good and punching holes
       through thick, softer material like concrete. It also has a
       secondary, fragmenting explosive on a short delay, following the
       detonation of the main charge, in order to kill occupants of a
       fortified position or building.
       A thermobaric warhead could certainly be developed, but would
       serve about the same purpose as the bunkerfaust warhead, and
       would be less precise in the manner in which it, well, destroyed
       things.
       Oh and the assisted, computerized targeting system is the
       Reich's equivalent of a Dynarange sight (
  HTML http://www.dn-defence.com/dynarange.html
  HTML http://www.dn-defence.com/dynarange.html
       ) which is not
       technically "guidance" -- well, it could be called laser
       guidance -- but has a similar result.
       #Post#: 3282--------------------------------------------------
       Re: NCSA military plan
       By: Caos Date: July 5, 2015, 4:35 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Do you have any specific ATGMs?
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page