DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
nCoV_info
HTML https://ncovinfo.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: studies,summaries
*****************************************************
#Post#: 80--------------------------------------------------
Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019
Novel Coronavirus–Infected Pneumonia
By: mixin Date: February 9, 2020, 10:05 am
---------------------------------------------------------
February 7, 2020
Conclusions and Relevance:
In this single-center case series of 138 hospitalized patients
with confirmed NCIP in Wuhan, China, presumed hospital-related
transmission of 2019-nCoV was suspected in 41% of patients, 26%
of patients received ICU care, and mortality was 4.3%.
(2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV)–infected pneumonia = (NCIP)
Results:
* Of 138 hospitalized patients with NCIP, the median age was 56
years (interquartile range, 42-68; range, 22-92 years) and 75
(54.3%) were men.
** Hospital-associated transmission was suspected as the
presumed mechanism of infection for affected health
professionals (40 [29%]) and hospitalized patients (17 [12.3%]).
** Common symptoms included fever (136 [98.6%]), fatigue (96
[69.6%]), and dry cough (82 [59.4%]). Lymphopenia (lymphocyte
count, 0.8 × 109/L [interquartile range {IQR},
0.6-1.1]) occurred in 97 patients (70.3%), prolonged prothrombin
time (13.0 seconds [IQR, 12.3-13.7]) in 80 patients (58%), and
elevated lactate dehydrogenase (261 U/L [IQR, 182-403]) in 55
patients (39.9%).
** Chest computed tomographic scans showed bilateral patchy
shadows or ground glass opacity in the lungs of all patients.
** Most patients received antiviral therapy (oseltamivir, 124
[89.9%]), and many received antibacterial therapy (moxifloxacin,
89 [64.4%]; ceftriaxone, 34 [24.6%]; azithromycin, 25 [18.1%])
and glucocorticoid therapy (62 [44.9%]).
** Thirty-six patients (26.1%) were transferred to the intensive
care unit (ICU) because of complications, including acute
respiratory distress syndrome (22 [61.1%]), arrhythmia (16
[44.4%]), and shock (11 [30.6%]).
** The median time from first symptom to dyspnea was 5.0 days,
to hospital admission was 7.0 days, and to ARDS was 8.0 days.
** Patients treated in the ICU (n = 36), compared
with patients not treated in the ICU (n = 102), were
older (median age, 66 years vs 51 years), were more likely to
have underlying comorbidities (26 [72.2%] vs 38 [37.3%]), and
were more likely to have dyspnea (23 [63.9%] vs 20 [19.6%]), and
anorexia (24 [66.7%] vs 31 [30.4%]).
** Of the 36 cases in the ICU, 4 (11.1%) received high-flow
oxygen therapy, 15 (41.7%) received noninvasive ventilation, and
17 (47.2%) received invasive ventilation (4 were switched to
extracorporeal membrane oxygenation).
** As of February 3, 47 patients (34.1%) were discharged and 6
died (overall mortality, 4.3%), but the remaining patients are
still hospitalized. Among those discharged alive
(n = 47), the median hospital stay was 10 days (IQR,
7.0-14.0).
HTML https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2761044
#Post#: 82--------------------------------------------------
Re: Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2
019 Novel Coronavirus–Infected Pneum
By: epsilon Date: February 9, 2020, 1:10 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
First large scale clinical study (n>1000 patients from all over
China)
HTML https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.02.06.20020974v1
Key points:
Fatality rate "only" 1.5%, definitely below SARS / MERS
BUT:
"Of 840 patients who underwent chest computed tomography on
admission, 76.4% manifested as
pneumonia" -> not good
[quote]Oxygen therapy, mechanical ventilation were initiated in
38.0%, 6.1% of patients, respectively [/quote]
Definitely not good. Means gigantic hospital/ICU capacity
necessary to deal with community outbreak.
[quote] Notably, fever occurred in only 43.8% of patients ...
such patients may be missed if the surveillance case definition
focused heavily on fever detection [/quote]
Not good.
[quote]The median incubation period was 3.0 days (range, 0 to
24.0) i.e. shorter than a recent report (3.0 days vs. 5.2 days)
[8][/quote]
Most worrying finding because it means the virus spreads
exponentially twice as fast as presumed.
-> Case doubling period may be even LESS THAN 3 DAYS (depending
on R0>3)
[quote]
we might have missed asymptomatic or mild
cases managed at home, and hence our cohort might represent the
more severe end of 2019-nCoV
[/quote]
This is reassuring. Hopefully mild clinical spectrum will turn
out to be large majority rather than the pneumonia cases.
*****************************************************