URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Nigerian Hardware and Software Forum
  HTML https://nairateck.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Business
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 8--------------------------------------------------
       Why Swiss Golden Nigeria Is Unrealistic And A Waste Of Money And
        Time.
       By: magbytes120 Date: June 10, 2017, 9:39 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Well many people may not know but I am an E-commerce consultant
       and my job is to scrutinize businesses that are online oriented
       and tell people which is a sustainable one or not and just as I
       warned about MMM as not sustainable about a year ago, I am
       coming out this time to state the red flags in swiss golden
       Nigeria.
       I will not bore you with stories and I wouldn't be writing this
       today if the admin of a certain wattsup group with number +234
       706 258 5988 did not evict me simply because according to him,I
       am spoiling his business (whatever that means) but all I did was
       simply professional trying to point out the red flags in the
       business when he ought to be simply professional by explaining
       to me.
       Now get this clear, I believe in network marketing and I am not
       calling swizz golden a scam but what I am simply pointing out is
       that the earning structure is very faulty,unrealistic and
       unstainable.
       Now the business module insists that you MUST refer 2 people and
       in fact you will not progress if a cycle is not complete and it
       takes 7 people(You inclusive) to cycle and according to the
       structure, once you earn, you start another cycle with your
       downlines following you if they also cycle and this goes on and
       on and on.....but what many fail to understand is that for this
       to happen,everyone who registers MUST sign up 2 people meaning
       the matrix must be filled up for the system to be sustained...in
       other words, the downlines structure must be in this format
       You
       2 downlines
       4 downlines
       One cycle
       Now for your two downlines to cycle there will be need for
       continuity meaning
       Your 2 downlines
       4 downlines
       8 downlines
       your 2 downlines achieves a cycle
       your 4 downlines of your immediate 2 will need
       4 downlines
       16 downlines
       32 downlines
       the 4 downlines above cycles.
       Now here is the glitch....for you to make a second cycle,you
       will not be needing just 7 people but
       you
       2
       people
       4
       8
       16
       32
       Meaning you will need 64 people to register under you.
       Now it is not the 62 that is the problem but the fact that
       everyone MUST sign up 2 people who MUST sign up another 2 in
       other to sustain the business.
       Invariably it means the business must have an arithmetic
       progression of a multiple of 2...
       2
       4
       8
       16
       32
       64
       128
       256
       512
       1024
       and on and on....
       In my years as a consultant,I have never seen a matrix filled up
       meaning there is no way that arithmetic progression can be
       achieved which simply means the earning structure only gives
       room for the early starters which is also a red flag.
       Some will say team work will ensure you get 2 downlines but no
       team work can sustain the matrix at a stage when it becomes so
       large.
       I do believe that if the Admin of swizz golden Nigeria can go
       back to the drawing board and bring out a sustainable earning
       structure, the business might just stand the test of time.
       A good earning structure of any network must not favor early
       starters but hard workers and must give room for participants to
       earn even if they only refer on person.
       I want intelligent contributors to prove me wrong.
       Thanks
       *****************************************************