DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
MT Lives!
HTML https://mtlives.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: General Discussion
*****************************************************
#Post#: 5570--------------------------------------------------
Re: The Return Of The King.
DIR By: The_Lone_Wolf
Date: October 24, 2019, 2:55 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: King Redd link ---
>
> [quote author=The_Lone_Wolf link=topic=166.msg5555#msg5555
date=1571837460]
> [quote author=King Redd link=topic=166.msg5545#msg5545
date=1571788278]
>
>
> Some crops grow better in low light, you could put up solar
panels that let a certain percentage of light through and grow
those crops, then you get 2 for 1. worlds problems solved...just
like that. make me president of the world. Thanks
>
--- End Quote ---
I've txt my mate at Illuminati HQ and put a word in for you.
[/quote]
Don't try to be funny again.
[/quote]
Much like you, I never try to be funny, I just post and people
react to it how they choose.
#Post#: 5628--------------------------------------------------
Re: The Return Of The King.
DIR By: doc
Date: October 27, 2019, 10:57 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: King Redd link ---
>
> [quote author=doc link=topic=166.msg5519#msg5519
date=1571745774]
> [quote author=King Redd link=topic=166.msg5506#msg5506
date=1571694241]
> [quote author=ItsNotLikeThat link=topic=166.msg5499#msg5499
date=1571685697]
> Total global veganism would never work.
>
> One cow can feed an entire village, one tomato can't.
>
--- End Quote ---
you know a cow eats a lot of food and drinks a lot of what
riight?
I have a field of cows near me, the field is massive with barely
any cows on it. Guess what would be done with that field if it
wasnt taken up by a few cows. A **** ton of crops could go on
it, or solar panels.
People don't realize how much room they need. We'd need much
less land if we were breeding and feeding 70+ billion animals
every year, theres only 7.5 billion humans...
[/quote]
Your far better off not putting solar panels on there if you
care about the environment or lives , we could grow crops on
there , but this requires cultivation and energy which would
actually be a negative for the environment and help support a
higher population, grass requires no effort and the cows are
fine.
If you where to argue for a nuclear option id be with you .
[/quote]
Some crops grow better in low light, you could put up solar
panels that let a certain percentage of light through and grow
those crops, then you get 2 for 1. worlds problems solved...just
like that. make me president of the world. Thanks
[/quote]
solar panels are a net negative when it comes to energy
production and lifespan, cost of production and energy that went
into making them, that's why they have to offer incentives to
con people into thinking they are saving money . they can also
be disastrous for the environment. Nuclear is by far the best
and safest method .
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lL6uB1z95gA
HTML https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2012/06/10/energys-deathprint-a-price-always-paid/#3b2dddc7709b
#Post#: 5631--------------------------------------------------
Re: The Return Of The King.
DIR By: Bookerman
Date: October 27, 2019, 5:36 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
As are turbines. They only last 20-25 years and the footprint to
decommission and make is greater than what they save in their
lifetime
#Post#: 5640--------------------------------------------------
Re: The Return Of The King.
DIR By: Newcy
Date: October 28, 2019, 7:22 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Nuclear power is the only viable option. We've known this for
30+years.
#Post#: 5657--------------------------------------------------
Re: The Return Of The King.
DIR By: King Redd
Date: October 28, 2019, 4:44 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: doc link ---
>
> [quote author=King Redd link=topic=166.msg5545#msg5545
date=1571788278]
> [quote author=doc link=topic=166.msg5519#msg5519
date=1571745774]
> [quote author=King Redd link=topic=166.msg5506#msg5506
date=1571694241]
> [quote author=ItsNotLikeThat link=topic=166.msg5499#msg5499
date=1571685697]
> Total global veganism would never work.
>
> One cow can feed an entire village, one tomato can't.
>
--- End Quote ---
you know a cow eats a lot of food and drinks a lot of what
riight?
I have a field of cows near me, the field is massive with barely
any cows on it. Guess what would be done with that field if it
wasnt taken up by a few cows. A **** ton of crops could go on
it, or solar panels.
People don't realize how much room they need. We'd need much
less land if we were breeding and feeding 70+ billion animals
every year, theres only 7.5 billion humans...
[/quote]
Your far better off not putting solar panels on there if you
care about the environment or lives , we could grow crops on
there , but this requires cultivation and energy which would
actually be a negative for the environment and help support a
higher population, grass requires no effort and the cows are
fine.
If you where to argue for a nuclear option id be with you .
[/quote]
Some crops grow better in low light, you could put up solar
panels that let a certain percentage of light through and grow
those crops, then you get 2 for 1. worlds problems solved...just
like that. make me president of the world. Thanks
[/quote]
solar panels are a net negative when it comes to energy
production and lifespan, cost of production and energy that went
into making them, that's why they have to offer incentives to
con people into thinking they are saving money . they can also
be disastrous for the environment. Nuclear is by far the best
and safest method .
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lL6uB1z95gA
HTML https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2012/06/10/energys-deathprint-a-price-always-paid/#3b2dddc7709b
[/quote]
I think I will trust people like Elon Musk, over this random
youtuber.
#Post#: 5664--------------------------------------------------
Re: The Return Of The King.
DIR By: doc
Date: October 29, 2019, 3:05 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: King Redd link ---
>
> [quote author=doc link=topic=166.msg5628#msg5628
date=1572191852]
> [quote author=King Redd link=topic=166.msg5545#msg5545
date=1571788278]
> [quote author=doc link=topic=166.msg5519#msg5519
date=1571745774]
> [quote author=King Redd link=topic=166.msg5506#msg5506
date=1571694241]
> [quote author=ItsNotLikeThat link=topic=166.msg5499#msg5499
date=1571685697]
> Total global veganism would never work.
>
> One cow can feed an entire village, one tomato can't.
>
--- End Quote ---
you know a cow eats a lot of food and drinks a lot of what
riight?
I have a field of cows near me, the field is massive with barely
any cows on it. Guess what would be done with that field if it
wasnt taken up by a few cows. A **** ton of crops could go on
it, or solar panels.
People don't realize how much room they need. We'd need much
less land if we were breeding and feeding 70+ billion animals
every year, theres only 7.5 billion humans...
[/quote]
Your far better off not putting solar panels on there if you
care about the environment or lives , we could grow crops on
there , but this requires cultivation and energy which would
actually be a negative for the environment and help support a
higher population, grass requires no effort and the cows are
fine.
If you where to argue for a nuclear option id be with you .
[/quote]
Some crops grow better in low light, you could put up solar
panels that let a certain percentage of light through and grow
those crops, then you get 2 for 1. worlds problems solved...just
like that. make me president of the world. Thanks
[/quote]
solar panels are a net negative when it comes to energy
production and lifespan, cost of production and energy that went
into making them, that's why they have to offer incentives to
con people into thinking they are saving money . they can also
be disastrous for the environment. Nuclear is by far the best
and safest method .
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lL6uB1z95gA
HTML https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2012/06/10/energys-deathprint-a-price-always-paid/#3b2dddc7709b
[/quote]
I think I will trust people like Elon Musk, over this random
youtuber.
[/quote]
Its a random youtuber presenting well known established facts ,
maybe Musk will invent something worthy in the future as far as
renewable energy , but its not here yet . go buy a feild and
fill it full of solar panels , dont take any gimmicky FIT's and
let me know how well ti goes.
#Post#: 5683--------------------------------------------------
Re: The Return Of The King.
DIR By: King Redd
Date: October 29, 2019, 6:39 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: doc link ---
>
> [quote author=King Redd link=topic=166.msg5657#msg5657
date=1572299094]
> [quote author=doc link=topic=166.msg5628#msg5628
date=1572191852]
> [quote author=King Redd link=topic=166.msg5545#msg5545
date=1571788278]
> [quote author=doc link=topic=166.msg5519#msg5519
date=1571745774]
> [quote author=King Redd link=topic=166.msg5506#msg5506
date=1571694241]
> [quote author=ItsNotLikeThat link=topic=166.msg5499#msg5499
date=1571685697]
> Total global veganism would never work.
>
> One cow can feed an entire village, one tomato can't.
>
--- End Quote ---
you know a cow eats a lot of food and drinks a lot of what
riight?
I have a field of cows near me, the field is massive with barely
any cows on it. Guess what would be done with that field if it
wasnt taken up by a few cows. A **** ton of crops could go on
it, or solar panels.
People don't realize how much room they need. We'd need much
less land if we were breeding and feeding 70+ billion animals
every year, theres only 7.5 billion humans...
[/quote]
Your far better off not putting solar panels on there if you
care about the environment or lives , we could grow crops on
there , but this requires cultivation and energy which would
actually be a negative for the environment and help support a
higher population, grass requires no effort and the cows are
fine.
If you where to argue for a nuclear option id be with you .
[/quote]
Some crops grow better in low light, you could put up solar
panels that let a certain percentage of light through and grow
those crops, then you get 2 for 1. worlds problems solved...just
like that. make me president of the world. Thanks
[/quote]
solar panels are a net negative when it comes to energy
production and lifespan, cost of production and energy that went
into making them, that's why they have to offer incentives to
con people into thinking they are saving money . they can also
be disastrous for the environment. Nuclear is by far the best
and safest method .
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lL6uB1z95gA
HTML https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2012/06/10/energys-deathprint-a-price-always-paid/#3b2dddc7709b
[/quote]
I think I will trust people like Elon Musk, over this random
youtuber.
[/quote]
Its a random youtuber presenting well known established facts ,
maybe Musk will invent something worthy in the future as far as
renewable energy , but its not here yet . go buy a feild and
fill it full of solar panels , dont take any gimmicky FIT's and
let me know how well ti goes.
[/quote]
Facts? If they are so well known I would have though the
youtuber would have link to his sources.
#Post#: 5688--------------------------------------------------
Re: The Return Of The King.
DIR By: doc
Date: October 29, 2019, 7:07 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: King Redd link ---
>
> [quote author=doc link=topic=166.msg5664#msg5664
date=1572336320]
> [quote author=King Redd link=topic=166.msg5657#msg5657
date=1572299094]
> [quote author=doc link=topic=166.msg5628#msg5628
date=1572191852]
> [quote author=King Redd link=topic=166.msg5545#msg5545
date=1571788278]
> [quote author=doc link=topic=166.msg5519#msg5519
date=1571745774]
> [quote author=King Redd link=topic=166.msg5506#msg5506
date=1571694241]
> [quote author=ItsNotLikeThat link=topic=166.msg5499#msg5499
date=1571685697]
> Total global veganism would never work.
>
> One cow can feed an entire village, one tomato can't.
>
--- End Quote ---
you know a cow eats a lot of food and drinks a lot of what
riight?
I have a field of cows near me, the field is massive with barely
any cows on it. Guess what would be done with that field if it
wasnt taken up by a few cows. A **** ton of crops could go on
it, or solar panels.
People don't realize how much room they need. We'd need much
less land if we were breeding and feeding 70+ billion animals
every year, theres only 7.5 billion humans...
[/quote]
Your far better off not putting solar panels on there if you
care about the environment or lives , we could grow crops on
there , but this requires cultivation and energy which would
actually be a negative for the environment and help support a
higher population, grass requires no effort and the cows are
fine.
If you where to argue for a nuclear option id be with you .
[/quote]
Some crops grow better in low light, you could put up solar
panels that let a certain percentage of light through and grow
those crops, then you get 2 for 1. worlds problems solved...just
like that. make me president of the world. Thanks
[/quote]
solar panels are a net negative when it comes to energy
production and lifespan, cost of production and energy that went
into making them, that's why they have to offer incentives to
con people into thinking they are saving money . they can also
be disastrous for the environment. Nuclear is by far the best
and safest method .
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lL6uB1z95gA
HTML https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2012/06/10/energys-deathprint-a-price-always-paid/#3b2dddc7709b
[/quote]
I think I will trust people like Elon Musk, over this random
youtuber.
[/quote]
Its a random youtuber presenting well known established facts ,
maybe Musk will invent something worthy in the future as far as
renewable energy , but its not here yet . go buy a feild and
fill it full of solar panels , dont take any gimmicky FIT's and
let me know how well ti goes.
[/quote]
Facts? If they are so well known I would have though the
youtuber would have link to his sources.
[/quote]
they are linked in the article you mong , read it properly.
#Post#: 5726--------------------------------------------------
Re: The Return Of The King.
DIR By: King Redd
Date: October 31, 2019, 11:07 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: doc link ---
>
> [quote author=King Redd link=topic=166.msg5683#msg5683
date=1572392383]
> [quote author=doc link=topic=166.msg5664#msg5664
date=1572336320]
> [quote author=King Redd link=topic=166.msg5657#msg5657
date=1572299094]
> [quote author=doc link=topic=166.msg5628#msg5628
date=1572191852]
> [quote author=King Redd link=topic=166.msg5545#msg5545
date=1571788278]
> [quote author=doc link=topic=166.msg5519#msg5519
date=1571745774]
> [quote author=King Redd link=topic=166.msg5506#msg5506
date=1571694241]
> [quote author=ItsNotLikeThat link=topic=166.msg5499#msg5499
date=1571685697]
> Total global veganism would never work.
>
> One cow can feed an entire village, one tomato can't.
>
--- End Quote ---
you know a cow eats a lot of food and drinks a lot of what
riight?
I have a field of cows near me, the field is massive with barely
any cows on it. Guess what would be done with that field if it
wasnt taken up by a few cows. A **** ton of crops could go on
it, or solar panels.
People don't realize how much room they need. We'd need much
less land if we were breeding and feeding 70+ billion animals
every year, theres only 7.5 billion humans...
[/quote]
Your far better off not putting solar panels on there if you
care about the environment or lives , we could grow crops on
there , but this requires cultivation and energy which would
actually be a negative for the environment and help support a
higher population, grass requires no effort and the cows are
fine.
If you where to argue for a nuclear option id be with you .
[/quote]
Some crops grow better in low light, you could put up solar
panels that let a certain percentage of light through and grow
those crops, then you get 2 for 1. worlds problems solved...just
like that. make me president of the world. Thanks
[/quote]
solar panels are a net negative when it comes to energy
production and lifespan, cost of production and energy that went
into making them, that's why they have to offer incentives to
con people into thinking they are saving money . they can also
be disastrous for the environment. Nuclear is by far the best
and safest method .
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lL6uB1z95gA
HTML https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2012/06/10/energys-deathprint-a-price-always-paid/#3b2dddc7709b
[/quote]
I think I will trust people like Elon Musk, over this random
youtuber.
[/quote]
Its a random youtuber presenting well known established facts ,
maybe Musk will invent something worthy in the future as far as
renewable energy , but its not here yet . go buy a feild and
fill it full of solar panels , dont take any gimmicky FIT's and
let me know how well ti goes.
[/quote]
Facts? If they are so well known I would have though the
youtuber would have link to his sources.
[/quote]
they are linked in the article you mong , read it properly.
[/quote]
I watched the terribly made video, I am not wasting my time
reading that article as well.
#Post#: 5727--------------------------------------------------
Re: The Return Of The King.
DIR By: Newcy
Date: October 31, 2019, 11:38 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Then you are a delusional idiot and no one, including doc should
should bother giving you the time of day.
*****************************************************
Page 6 of 8
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page