DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
MT Lives!
HTML https://mtlives.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: General Discussion
*****************************************************
#Post#: 3685--------------------------------------------------
Re: Fake moon landings
By: doc Date: August 11, 2019, 10:31 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=ANIMAL link=topic=154.msg3647#msg3647
date=1565459765]
Apollo 11 left behind a retroreflector and Apollo 14 left behind
2 more. You can literally point a laser beam from Earth to the
Moon and it will bounce back. Irrefutable proof that we went to
the moon.
[/quote]
no doubt there is a reflector there but this doesn't prove man
went there, we know probes and landers have been there.
Many other nations have done this as well.
Also as for Russians and china wanting to disprove the moon
landings, if you speak with their citizens not many of them
believe the story to be true , it's only in the west we believe
it happened.
If they did pull off this gigantic fluke then a lot of the
footage was faked and it wasn't as reported, and it wasnt the 3
astronauts it was said to be .
#Post#: 3720--------------------------------------------------
Re: Fake moon landings
By: Teapot Date: August 12, 2019, 1:46 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I've read pretty much every book, autobiography etc by
astronauts, nasa controllers, im a rocket/space nut. If you
honestly think they didn't go to the moon because of a YouTube
video, i genuinely think wtf.
Really surprised with the members on here who id consider to be
intelligent people interested in the truth, coming to such a
conclusion. Try harder.
#Post#: 3721--------------------------------------------------
Re: Fake moon landings
By: Newcy Date: August 12, 2019, 2:23 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
What makes a YouTube video less credible than an astronauts
autobiography?
#Post#: 3731--------------------------------------------------
Re: Fake moon landings
By: Muscle Date: August 12, 2019, 5:43 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=Teapot link=topic=154.msg3720#msg3720
date=1565635573]
I've read pretty much every book, autobiography etc by
astronauts, nasa controllers, im a rocket/space nut. If you
honestly think they didn't go to the moon because of a YouTube
video, i genuinely think wtf.
Really surprised with the members on here who id consider to be
intelligent people interested in the truth, coming to such a
conclusion. Try harder.
[/quote]
I didn't see how its something anyone can be certain on mate.
Isn't Nasa still trying to work out a way to get through the Van
Allen radiation belt?
#Post#: 3732--------------------------------------------------
Re: Fake moon landings
By: doc Date: August 12, 2019, 6:18 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
TP ive read a lot too and if yo read the biographies they make
good reading, but if you look at the actual evidence there is
definitely fake footage , especially them trying to make it look
like they where close to the moon when there where in earth
orbit.
Why wouldn't Aldrin and Mitchell explain exactly what happened
rather than threaten lawsuits and death by CIA ?Why would they
be concerned at all about that footage being leaked ?
As muscle says , you can't possibly know either way , its
requires faith/belief and not looking at quite a bit of dodgy
evidence . Yes there are a million dodgy BS conspiracy theories
stuck in there too and that doesn't mean anyone whos on the ide
of us not going believes in them all.
lot of money to spend for research on something we've already
conquered , but then again its another good tax heist.
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOM-cSa93IM
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tZs02kxTdg
#Post#: 3753--------------------------------------------------
Re: Fake moon landings
By: Brett Date: August 13, 2019, 4:53 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Lol go watch the original Star Trek and tell me that they could
make a fake moon landing video that is beyond reproach in those
times.
End of the day things did go wrong. There was lives lost in the
pursuit of that objective. The previous Apollo missions were all
just tests and practice to make sure they could get it right. It
was a space race. They had to beat the Russians no matter what.
If it meant hurling a tin can to the moon and hoping that it
will land without a hitch then that’s what they did.
If Russia even had an iota of suspicion it was fake they would
have gone and shown there was no evidence.
You lot can believe in huge alien conspiracies and 911 towers
being blown up by their own people but you can’t believe they
landed on a rock with no atmosphere just a stones throw from
orbit? Come on.
#Post#: 3763--------------------------------------------------
Re: Fake moon landings
By: doc Date: August 13, 2019, 7:07 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=Brett link=topic=154.msg3753#msg3753
date=1565690008]
Lol go watch the original Star Trek and tell me that they could
make a fake moon landing video that is beyond reproach in those
times.
[/quote]
They had billions $ at their disposal , it would have been much
easier to fake than actually go there , proprietary
software/hardware that could have also been destroyed along with
the tech that could have got us to the moon. Just as the moon
tech wasn't released , they would release something in TV
studios that could have faked a moon landling.
Yor star trek analogy is poor because you're saying we couldn't
make a Tv programme look good in a time where we actually
travelled to the moon and back . Yet now we have the tech to
make a CGI moon landing but we still don't have the tech to go
to the moon.
If we did go to the moon and government spending does create
jobs ( as they say) then we would have manned bases on Mars by
now .
not into the alien thing , but you cant seriously say that 911
wasn't a conspiracy.
a building turns to dust in mid air and never hits the floor , 3
buildings came down with 2 planes, 6 buildings destroyed ,
pentagon had an aluminum plane penetrate 3 steal/concrete rings
.
No idea why we invest so much in ballistics and missiles if you
can throw a can of coke through a building.
#Post#: 3764--------------------------------------------------
Re: Fake moon landings
By: cu3ed Date: August 13, 2019, 7:22 am
---------------------------------------------------------
It was technically impossible to "fake" the landings for the
amount of broadcast time.
Its was technologically much easier to actually go to the moon.
The double loops in thinking is fucking staggering what people
tell themselves.
#Post#: 3766--------------------------------------------------
Re: Fake moon landings
By: Teapot Date: August 13, 2019, 7:39 am
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://youtu.be/DKtVpvzUF1Y
So where did they go? Did they hide in orbit around the earth?
Doc, do you know how many times they actually travelled to the
moon, how did they recover moon rock, etc etc etc. Its quite an
absurd notion.
As has been said, you think the russians wouldn't have had some
thing to say about a fake landing.
#Post#: 3767--------------------------------------------------
Re: Fake moon landings
By: Teapot Date: August 13, 2019, 7:44 am
---------------------------------------------------------
They say Stanley Kubrick wanted the fake landing to be so
authentic that they filmed it on location. Lol
*****************************************************
DIR Next Page