URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       MS Speaks
  HTML https://msspeaks.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: MAYZENT (siponimod)
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 1199--------------------------------------------------
       Mayzent (siponimod, BAF312) for active SPMS, RRMS
       By: agate Date: April 29, 2016, 9:58 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       From the MSAA 2015 Research Update:
       [quote]Siponimod (BAF312)
       Data from a Phase II dose-finding study of siponimod in people
       with RRMS were also reported in 2012. Siponimod has a relatively
       short half-life compared to Gilenya, which means that the drug
       does not stay in the body as long. Researchers hope that this
       will minimize cardiac issues.
       The trial had a complex design in which the goal was to
       determine the most appropriate dosing regimen. One group of 188
       patients received placebo or once-daily siponimod in doses of 10
       mg, 2 mg, or 0.5 mg for six months. A second group of 109
       patients were given one of two additional intermediate doses of
       1.25 mg or 0.25 mg for three months.
       At six months, the proportion of relapse-free patients as
       compared to placebo was 84 percent for the 10-mg group, 92
       percent for the 2-mg group, and 77 percent for the 0.5-mg group.
       In the placebo group, 72 percent were relapse-free. After six
       months, the ARR (annual relapse rate) was lower for the
       individuals who were taking one of the three higher doses, as
       compared to those taking one of the two lower doses or the
       placebo. Additionally, MRI findings indicated that treatment
       with siponimod was associated with a reduction in active lesions
       on MRI. The 2-mg dose reached statistical significance versus
       placebo, with a reduction in active lesions of approximately 80
       percent.
       A Phase III trial of siponimod in secondary-progressive MS (the
       EXPAND trial)58 began recruitment in 2013, and is expected to
       run through Fall 2016. This is the first S1P receptor modulator
       to be studied in SPMS.[/quote]
  HTML http://mymsaa.org/publications/msresearch-update-2015/siponimod/
       #Post#: 1341--------------------------------------------------
       MSAA update on siponimod--Phase III trial results promising for 
       SPMS
       By: agate Date: August 26, 2016, 6:05 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       MSAA newsletter, August 26, 2016:
       [quote]Experimental SPMS Medication Shows Positive Results
       A Phase III study with siponimod, an experimental oral treatment
       for MS, is showing positive results for individuals with
       secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS).
       According to an August 25th press release from Novartis, the
       pharmaceutical company developing siponimod, the Phase III
       EXPAND study met its primary endpoint, which was to reduce the
       risk of confirmed disability progression at three months, versus
       a placebo. This improvement in the time to three-month confirmed
       disability progression was determined according to measurements
       on the expanded disability status scale (EDSS).
       These study results are significant because no disease-modifying
       therapy is available in the United States for the long-term
       treatment of SPMS. This form of MS follows relapsing-remitting
       MS (RRMS) and is characterized by a slow and steady progression,
       with or without relapses. If relapses do occur, they usually do
       not fully remit.
       Novartis states that the EXPAND trial is the largest randomized,
       double-blind, placebo-controlled study to date with individuals
       diagnosed with SPMS and included 1,651 people with SPMS from 31
       countries. Study participants received either 2 mgs of the oral
       medication siponimod, taken once daily, or a placebo. These were
       given in a 2:1 ratio, so twice as many participants were on the
       active medication versus the placebo.
       Siponimod, also known as BAF312, is in a class of
       immunomodulatory drugs called “S1P-receptor modulators.”
       According to MSAA’s MS Research Update in 2016, the structure of
       these medications is similar to a naturally occurring component
       of cell-surface receptors on white blood cells. These
       medications block potentially damaging T cells from leaving
       lymph nodes, lowering their number in the blood and tissues.
       They may reduce damage to the central nervous system (CNS) and
       enhance the repair of damaged nerves within the brain and spinal
       cord.
       MSAA’s MS Research Update in 2016 also notes that another oral
       treatment for MS, Gilenya® (fingolimod), was the first
       S1P-receptor modulator approved for treating relapsing forms of
       MS and study data suggest that it may have neuro-protective
       effects. Siponimod is a similar medication to Gilenya and has a
       relatively short half-life, which means that the drug does not
       stay in the body as long. Researchers hope that this will
       minimize cardiac issues that are often seen with these types of
       medications.
       While Novartis announced that the study met its primary
       endpoint, specific details on the results were not included.
       According to the press release, secondary endpoints include
       delay in the time to six-month confirmed disability progression
       versus placebo, time to confirmed worsening of at least 20
       percent from baseline in the timed 25-foot walk test (T25FW), T2
       lesion volume, annualized relapse rate (ARR), and the safety and
       tolerability of siponimod in people with SPMS. Initial results
       of the EXPAND study, including primary and key secondary
       endpoints, will be presented at the European Committee for
       Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS) annual
       meeting, which will be held this September in London, England.
       MSAA’s Chief Medical Consultant Dr. Jack Burks explains, “The
       possibility of having a treatment available to individuals with
       secondary-progressive MS is very exciting and brightens the
       future for everyone with this form of the disease. Readers
       should note that while the three-month data are encouraging, we
       await the results of the six-month findings, other secondary
       endpoints, and safety data. Additionally, we will get more
       insight into siponimod’s effectiveness with non-relapsing as
       well as relapsing SPMS patients. I look forward to learning
       about these and other details when new data are presented at
       ECTRIMS next month.”
       ...
       ____________________
       Written by Susan Courtney, MSAA Senior Writer
       Reviewed by Jack Burks, MD, MSAA Chief Medical Consultant
       Portions of MSAA’s MS Research Update 2016, coauthored by
       Stephen Krieger, MD and Michelle Fabian, MD, were also included
       in this article.[/quote]
       The article can be seen here
  HTML http://mymsaa.org/experimental-spms-medication-shows-positive-results/.
       #Post#: 1358--------------------------------------------------
       (Abst.) Safety and efficacy of siponimod (BAF312) in RRMS
       By: agate Date: September 13, 2016, 7:07 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       An abstract of an earlier study of siponimod.
       From JAMA Neurology, September 2016:
       [quote]Safety and Efficacy of Siponimod (BAF312) in Patients
       With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
       Dose-Blinded, Randomized Extension of the Phase 2 BOLD Study
       Ludwig Kappos, MD1,2,3; David K. B. Li, MD4,5; Olaf Stüve, MD6;
       Hans-Peter Hartung, MD7; Mark S. Freedman, MD8; Bernhard Hemmer,
       MD9; Peter Rieckmann, MD10; Xavier Montalban, MD11; Tjalf
       Ziemssen, MD12; Brian Hunter, PhD13; Sophie Arnould, PhD13; Erik
       Wallström, MD13; Krzysztof Selmaj, MD14
       Importance
       This dose-blinded extension of the phase 2 BOLD (BAF312 on MRI
       Lesion Given Once Daily) Study in relapsing-remitting multiple
       sclerosis provides evidence on disease activity and safety of a
       range of siponimod doses for up to 24 months.
       Objective
       To assess the safety and efficacy of siponimod for up to 24
       months during the dose-blinded extension of the BOLD Study.
       Design, Setting, and Participants
       At extension baseline in a randomized clinical trial, patients
       taking siponimod continued at the originally assigned dose and
       patients taking placebo were rerandomized to the 5 siponimod
       doses. Initial treatment was titrated over 10 days. A total of
       252 eligible patients were treated at specialized multiple
       sclerosis centers for this study conducted from August 30, 2010,
       through June 3, 2013.
       Interventions
       Siponimod at 10-mg, 2-mg, 1.25-mg, 0.5-mg, and 0.25-mg doses.
       Main Outcomes and Measures
       Safety assessment included blood tests, documentation of
       adverse events at regular scheduled visits and Holter
       monitoring; key efficacy measures were annualized relapse rate
       and magnetic resonance imaging lesion activity.
       Results
       Among the 252 eligible patients, the mean (SD) ages were 37.2
       (8.4) years, 35.2 (9.1) years, 34.0 (7.6) years, 35.1 (9.2)
       years, and 36.8 (9.1) years in the 0.25-mg, 0.5-mg, 1.25-mg,
       2-mg, and 10-mg groups. Of the 252 patients, 184 (73%) entered
       the extension and received siponimod (10 mg: n = 33;
       2 mg: n = 29; 1.25 mg: n = 43; 0.5 mg:
       n = 29; and 0.25 mg: n = 50); 159
       (86.4%) completed the dose-blinded extension. The incidence of
       adverse events was similar across treatment groups (10 mg:
       87.9%; 2 mg: 89.7%; 1.25 mg: 88.4%; 0.5 mg: 96.6%; and 0.25 mg:
       84.0%).
       Nine patients reported serious adverse events (2 mg: 3/29
       [10.3%], 1.25 mg: 1/43 [2.3%], 0.5 mg: 4/29 [13.8%], and 0.25
       mg: 1/50 [2.0%]; no serious adverse event was reported for more
       than 1 patient and no new safety signals occurred compared with
       the BOLD Study. Dose titration mitigated symptomatic bradycardic
       events. Reductions in mean (95% CI) gadolinium-enhancing T1
       lesion counts from the last BOLD assessment were sustained in
       the 10-mg, 2-mg, 1.25-mg, and 0.5-mg dose groups (0 [0-0], 0.1
       [0-1.9], 0.1 [0-2.6], and 0.1 [0-2.8] at month 24,
       respectively). At the 3 highest vs 2 lowest doses, the estimated
       new/newly enlarging T2 lesion counts (95% CIs) were lower during
       months 6 to 12 (0.5 [0.2-1.3], 0.4 [0.2-1.1], and 0.2 [0.1-0.6]
       vs 1.3 [0.6-2.8] and 1.4 [0.7-2.7]), months 12 to 18 (0.4
       [0.1-1.1], 0.4 [0.1-1.3], and 0.4 [0.2-1.0] vs 1.0 [0.4-2.6] and
       3.6 [1.7-7.6]), and months 18 to 24 (0 [0-not estimable], 0.9
       [0.1-7.6], and 0.1 [0-1.7] vs 1.6 [0.3-7.7] and 2.0 [0.4-9.5]).
       Annualized relapse rates (95% CIs) up to month 24 were similarly
       lower for the 3 highest doses: 0.22 (0.12-0.40) for 10 mg, 0.20
       (0.10-0.38) for 2 mg, and 0.14 (0.08-0.26) for 1.25 mg vs 0.33
       (0.19-0.56) for 0.5 mg and 0.33 (0.21-0.50) for 0.25 mg.
       Conclusions and Relevance
       For up to 24 months of siponimod treatment, multiple sclerosis
       disease activity was low and there were no new safety signals;
       investigation in phase 3 trials is encouraged.
       Trial Registration  clinicaltrials.gov Identifier:
       NCT01185821[/quote]
       #Post#: 1376--------------------------------------------------
       (ECTRIMS) Efficacy and safety of siponimod in SPMS (Phase 3 EXPA
       ND study)
       By: agate Date: September 21, 2016, 3:44 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Presented at the annual ECTRIMS conference (London, September
       14-17, 2016):
       [quote] Efficacy and safety of siponimod in secondary
       progressive multiple sclerosis - results of the placebo
       controlled, double-blind, Phase III EXPAND study
       L. Kappos1, A. Bar-Or2, B. Cree3, R. Fox4, G. Giovannoni5, R.
       Gold6, P. Vermersch7, S. Arnould8, T. Sidorenko8, C. Wolf9, E.
       Wallstroem8, F. Dahlke8
       1Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine,
       Clinical Research, Biomedicine and Biomedical Engineering,
       University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland, 2Neuroimmunology Unit,
       Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University,
       Montreal, QC, Canada, 3Multiple Sclerosis Centre, University of
       California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 4Mellen Centre for
       Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis, Neurological
       Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States,
       5Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and
       Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United
       Kingdom, 6Department of Neurology, St.
       Josef-Hospital/Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany,
       7University of Lille, Department of Neurology, Lille City,
       France, 8Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland, 9Lycalis sprl,
       Brussels, Belgium
       Background:
       There is high unmet need for treatments that delay disability
       progression in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS).
       Siponimod (BAF312) is an orally active selective modulator of
       the sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor subtypes 1 and 5. EXPAND is
       the largest randomised controlled study in SPMS to date.
       Objective:
       EXPAND is a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind,
       placebo-controlled study designed to evaluate the efficacy,
       safety and tolerability of siponimod in treatment of SPMS.
       Design/methods:
       Patients with SPMS, defined by a progressive increase in
       disability (of ≥6 months duration) in the absence of or
       independent of relapses, aged 18‒60 years and an Expanded
       Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score from 3.0‒6.5 were
       enrolled.
       Eligible patients were randomised (2:1) to receive either 2mg
       once daily siponimod (following initial dose titration starting
       at 0.25mg) or matching placebo. The event-driven study design
       allowed the blinded Core study stop after a pre-specified number
       of confirmed disability progression (CDP) events occurred.
       The primary efficacy outcome was time to 3-month CDP measured by
       EDSS. The key secondary outcomes were time to confirmed
       worsening of ≥20% from baseline in the timed 25-foot walk
       test and T2 lesion volume change from baseline.
       Safety assessments included reporting of adverse events (AEs),
       serious AEs (SAEs) and clinically notable laboratory
       abnormalities. Patients who completed the Core phase were
       offered to receive open-label siponimod in the Extension phase.
       Results:
       Overall, 1651 patients were randomised in 31 countries. Baseline
       demographics and disease characteristics were previously
       reported, and they are representative of a patient population
       with SPMS. Overall, 1363 (83%) patients completed the Core
       study. Median time on study at core study completion was 21
       months with majority of patients (87%) participating for
       ≥1 year. There were 449 CDP events (each patient could
       maximally contribute one event for the primary endpoint). AEs
       were reported in 85.3% and SAEs in 16.7% of patients.
       Conclusions:
       Top line efficacy and safety results of the EXPAND study will be
       presented. The results of this large controlled study that
       recruited an active SPMS population with and without
       superimposed relapses will determine if siponimod delays
       disability progression in SPMS, and will contribute to a better
       understanding of the natural history of SPMS in a
       well-controlled trial setting.
       _________________
       Disclosure:
       Funding source: This study is supported by Novartis Pharma AG,
       Basel, Switzerland.
       Ludwig Kappos' institution (University Hospital Basel) has
       received in the last 3 years and used exclusively for research
       support: steering committee, advisory board, and consultancy
       fees from Actelion, Addex, Bayer HealthCare, Biogen Idec,
       Biotica, Genzyme, Lilly, Merck, Mitsubishi, Novartis, Ono
       Pharma, Pfizer, Receptos, Sanofi, Santhera, Siemens, Teva, UCB,
       and Xenoport; speaker fees from Bayer HealthCare, Biogen Idec,
       Merck, Novartis, Sanofi, and Teva; support of educational
       activities from Bayer HealthCare, Biogen, CSL Behring, Genzyme,
       Merck, Novartis, Sanofi, and Teva; royalties from Neurostatus
       Systems GmbH and grants from Bayer HealthCare, Biogen Idec,
       European Union, Merck, Novartis, Roche Research Foundation,
       Swiss MS Society, and the Swiss National Research Foundation.
       Amit Bar-Or has participated as a speaker in meetings sponsored
       by and received consulting fees from Amplimmune, Biogen Idec,
       Diogenix, Genentech, Sanofi-Genzyme, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis,
       Ono Pharma, Teva Neuroscience, Receptos Inc., Roche, and
       Merck/EMD Serono and has received grant support from Amplimmune,
       Biogen Idec, Diogenix, Genentech, Sanofi- Genzyme,
       GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Ono Pharma, Teva Neuroscience,
       Receptos Inc., Roche, and Merck/EMD Serono.
       Bruce Cree has received personal compensation for consulting
       from Abbvie, Biogen Idec, EMD Serono, MedImmune, Novartis,
       Genzyme/Sanofi Aventis, and Teva Neurosciences; contracted
       research support (including clinical trials) from Acorda, Biogen
       Idec, EMD Serono, Hoffman La Roche, MedImmune, and Teva
       Neurosciences.
       Robert Fox has received compensation for serving as consultant
       or speaker from Allozyne, Avanir, Biogen Idec, Novartis,
       Questcor, and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries; he or the
       institution he works for has received research support from
       Novartis.
       Gavin Giovannoni is steering committee member on the Daclizumab
       trials for AbbVie, steering committee member on the BG12 and
       Daclizumab trials for Biogen-Idec, has received consultancy fees
       for advisory board meetings, honoraria for speaking at
       Physicians summit, consultancy fees for advisory board meetings
       and steering committee for oral cladribine trials for
       Merck-Serono, steering committee member on Fingolimod and
       Siponimod trials for Novartis, steering committee member on the
       laquinimod trials for Teva, consultancy fees for advisory board
       meetings for Genzyme-Sanofi, honoraria for speaking at several
       medical education meetings, steering committee member on
       Ocrelizumab trials for Roche, consultancy fees in relation to
       DSMB activities for Synthon BV and Co-chief editor of Multiple
       Sclerosis and Related Disorders (Elsevier).
       Ralf Gold has received compensation for serving as consultant or
       speaker from Bayer HealthCare, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono,
       Novartis, and Teva Neuroscience, and he or the institution he
       works for has received research support from Bayer HealthCare,
       Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, and Teva Neuroscience.
       Patrick Vermersch has received honoraria and consulting fees
       from Biogen Idec, Genzyme-Sanofi, Bayer, Novartis, Merck Serono,
       GSK and Almirall; research support from Biogen Idec,
       Genzyme-Sanofi, Bayer, and Merck Serono.
       Sophie Arnould, Tatiana Sidorenko, Erik Wallstroem and Frank
       Dahlke are employees of Novartis.
       Christian Wolf is a partner at Lycalis sprl. He is serving as a
       consultant to Novartis and has also received compensation for
       serving as a consultant for to-BBB, Desitin, Investitionsbank
       Berlin, Keyrus, Synthon, Mylan and Teva.[/quote]
       #Post#: 1383--------------------------------------------------
       Siponimod may slow worsening in SPMS
       By: agate Date: September 25, 2016, 11:03 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       An article about the study that appeared in MedPage Today,
       September 19, 2016:
  HTML http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/ECTRIMS/60297?xid=nl_mpt_DHE_2016-09-19&eun=g345846d0r&pos=10
  HTML http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/ECTRIMS/60297?xid=nl_mpt_DHE_2016-09-19&eun=g345846d0r&pos=10
       #Post#: 1387--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Siponimod (BAF312)
       By: ssalimi Date: September 28, 2016, 8:06 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Interesting that it only targets S1P-1/5 receptors rather than
       1-5 like Fingolimod. Hoping to soon see what the AEs and SAEs
       were
       #Post#: 1388--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Siponimod (BAF312)
       By: agate Date: September 28, 2016, 8:38 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=ssalimi link=topic=956.msg1387#msg1387
       date=1475111199]
       Interesting that it only targets S1P-1/5 receptors rather than
       1-5 like Fingolimod. Hoping to soon see what the AEs and SAEs
       were
       [/quote]
       Yes. I'm not sure what this means, exactly:
       [quote]Nine patients reported serious adverse events (2 mg: 3/29
       [10.3%], 1.25 mg: 1/43 [2.3%], 0.5 mg: 4/29 [13.8%], and 0.25
       mg: 1/50 [2.0%]; no serious adverse event was reported for more
       than 1 patient and no new safety signals occurred compared with
       the BOLD Study.[/quote]
       If there were 9 patients reporting SAEs, how can it be stated
       that "no serious adverse event was reported for more than 1
       patient..."? Maybe I haven't read this right, or maybe there's a
       misprint.
       I'm very pleased that something is being developed for SPMS, and
       it's encouraging that siponimod doesn't linger for very long in
       the body.
       #Post#: 1656--------------------------------------------------
       Novartis fast tracks siponimod (BAF312) for RRMS
       By: agate Date: April 26, 2017, 2:03 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Fast on the heels of the approval of Ocrevus, BAF312 (siponimod)
       is about to be made available to us. From MedPage Today, April
       25--"Novartis Fast Tracks Early MS Drug":
  HTML https://www.medpagetoday.com/Neurology/MultipleSclerosis/64789
  HTML https://www.medpagetoday.com/Neurology/MultipleSclerosis/64789
       #Post#: 2024--------------------------------------------------
       Phase 3 trial results looking good for siponimod (and Novartis) 
       to treat SPMS
       By: agate Date: March 23, 2018, 11:09 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Lancet article (March 22) on the Phase III siponimod
       study--"Siponimod vs. placebo in secondary progress multiple
       sclerosis (EXPAND): A double-blind, randomised, phase 3 study"
  HTML http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(18)30475-6/fulltext
       This is getting attention in the financial sector--from
       Endpoints News, March 23--"Poised for an FDA pitch, Novartis
       lays out all its Phase 3 cards on MS drug siponimod":
  HTML https://endpts.com/poised-for-an-fda-pitch-novartis-lays-out-all-its-phiii-cards-on-ms-drug-siponimod/
       #Post#: 2050--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Siponimod (BAF312) for SPMS
       By: agate Date: April 18, 2018, 1:29 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       More study is needed, according to this. From NEJM Journal Watch
       Neurology, April 13, 2018:
       SUMMARY AND COMMENT | NEUROLOGY
       April 13, 2018
       Siponimod for Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis
  HTML http://response.jwatch.org/t?r=3963&c=4977&l=8&ctl=326D9:504826E9A16F346E0DB1ACACF4AA2655D2B71D9A95FA21D3&?query=etoc_jwneuro&jwd=000100983645&jspc=
       Jaime Toro, MD
  HTML http://response.jwatch.org/t?r=3963&c=4977&l=8&ctl=326DC:504826E9A16F346E0DB1ACACF4AA2655D2B71D9A95FA21D3&<br
       />reviewing Kappos L et al. Lancet 2018 Mar 31.
       Is siponimod an effective and safe drug for the treatment of
       patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis?
       Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) is an MS subtype
       characterized by worsening of disability that begins insidiously
       in patients with preceding relapsing-remitting (RR) course,
       which is the most common mode of onset. The risk for and timing
       of transition from RRMS to SPMS is unpredictable; however, up to
       90% of RRMS may evolve to SPMS over a 25-year time interval.
       Several disease-modifying therapies have shown efficacy in
       reducing relapses and disease activity in RRMS, but most of
       these have failed to prevent disease worsening in progressive
       MS.
       This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled,
       manufacturer-funded phase 3 study was done at almost 300
       hospital clinics and specialized MS centers in 31 countries.
       Researchers randomized 1651 patients with a diagnosis of SPMS to
       the investigational drug siponimod (1105 patients) or placebo
       (546 patients). Of these, 1327 (80%) completed the study (82% on
       siponimod vs. 78% on placebo). Median time on study was 21
       months and median exposure to the drug was 18 months.
       Three-month confirmed disability progression, the primary
       outcome, occurred in 288 (26%) of 1096 patients receiving
       siponimod and 173 (32%) of 545 patients receiving placebo, a
       significant difference (hazard ratio, 0.79; relative risk
       reduction, 21%). Adverse events were reported in more siponimod
       than placebo recipients (89% of 1099 patients vs. 82% of 546
       patients), including adverse events described previously with
       other sphingosine-1-phophate receptor modulators (e.g.,
       bradycardia, hypertension, varicella zoster reactivation) and
       more serious adverse events (18% vs. 15%). Frequencies of
       infections, malignancies, and mortality were the same in both
       treatment groups.
       COMMENT:
       In this study, siponimod reduced the risk for disability
       progression in a large population of patients, many of whom
       entered the study having already reached the nonrelapsing stage
       of SPMS with a high level of established disability. Although
       siponimod also had a good safety profile, other studies must be
       carried out to confirm that this drug could be an option in the
       treatment of SPMS.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page