URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       MS Speaks
  HTML https://msspeaks.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: COPAXONE, GLATOPA (glatiramer acetate)
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 507--------------------------------------------------
       Generic Copaxone probably as good as the brand-name
   DIR By: agate
       Date: October 7, 2014, 6:52 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       From the MS Research Roundup, MS Discovery Forum, October 3,
       2014:
       --- Quote ---
       > Copaxone Meets Its Match in Generic
       >
       > In the United States, MS drugs cost patients—or their health
       insurance plans—an estimated $40,000 to $50,000 per year. That
       makes a potential generic drug huge news. A phase 3 head-to-head
       trial of a generic version of glatiramer acetate versus the
       original Copaxone (Teva) suggested that the generic version
       works as well as the brand name for new lesions (as measured by
       T1 gadolinium-enhancing MRI) and reducing relapses, with similar
       rates of adverse events. If approved by the U.S. Food and Drug
       Administration, this could be the first U.S.-approved generic
       drug for MS. The researchers tested the generic against both
       Copaxone and a placebo in 735 patients with RRMS for 9 months.
       Of course, researchers are still nailing down exactly how the
       original drug works.
       >
       > In an article published earlier this week in JAMA Neurology,
       Nancy Monson, Ph.D., and colleagues at the University of Texas
       Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas concluded that some of
       Copaxone’s thera-peutic benefit comes from its effect on
       dysregulated B cells. However, they could not confirm that it
       does so by restoring B cells’ ability to produce cytokines, as
       some theorize. (Cleveland Plain Dealer, ClinicalTrials.gov, Fox
       News, HCP Live, PubMed)
       --- End Quote ---
       #Post#: 970--------------------------------------------------
       (Abst.) Equivalence of generic glatiramer acetate in MS:
       clinical trial
   DIR By: agate
       Date: October 13, 2015, 12:59 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The generic glatiramer acetate is said to be the equivalent of
       Copaxone.
       From PubMed, October 13, 2015:
       --- Quote ---
       > JAMA Neurol. 2015 Oct 12:1-9.
       >
       > Equivalence of Generic Glatiramer Acetate in Multiple
       Sclerosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
       >
       > Cohen J1, Belova A2, Selmaj K3, Wolf C4, Sormani MP5, Oberyé
       J6, van den Tweel E6, Mulder R6, Koper N6, Voortman G6, Barkhof
       F7; Glatiramer Acetate Clinical Trial to Assess Equivalence With
       Copaxone (GATE) Study Group.
       >
       > Author information
       >
       > 1Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research,
       Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
       > 2Functional Diagnostics, Research Institute of Traumatology
       and Orthopedics, Nizhniy Novgorod, Russian Federation.
       > 3Neurology Center Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
       > 4Lycalis sprl, Brussels, Belgium.
       > 5Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa,
       Italy.
       > 6Synthon BV, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
       > 7Image Analysis Center, Department of Radiology and Nuclear
       Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the
       Netherlands.
       >
       > IMPORTANCE:
       >
       > The patents for the first approved treatments for
       relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis are expiring, creating
       the opportunity to develop generic alternatives.
       >
       > OBJECTIVE:
       >
       > To evaluate in the Glatiramer Acetate Clinical Trial to Assess
       Equivalence With Copaxone (GATE) study whether generic
       glatiramer acetate (hereafter generic drug) is equivalent to the
       originator brand glatiramer acetate (hereafter brand drug)
       product, as measured by imaging and clinical end points, safety,
       and tolerability.
       >
       > DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:
       >
       > Randomized, multicenter, double-blind, active and
       placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. The setting included academic
       medical centers and clinical practices.
       >
       > Participants were patients with relapsing-remitting multiple
       sclerosis 18 to 55 years old with at least 1 relapse in the
       prior year and 1 to 15 gadolinium-enhancing brain magnetic
       resonance imaging lesions. They were randomized between December
       7, 2011, and March 21, 2013. The last participant completed
       follow-up December 2, 2013.
       >
       > INTERVENTIONS:
       >
       > Participants were randomized 4.3:4.3:1 to receive generic
       glatiramer acetate (20 mg), brand glatiramer acetate (20 mg), or
       placebo by daily subcutaneous injection for 9 months.
       >
       > MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES:
       >
       > The primary end point was the total number of
       gadolinium-enhancing lesions during months 7, 8, and 9.
       Additional end points included other magnetic resonance imaging
       parameters, annualized relapse rate, and Expanded Disability
       Status Scale score. Safety and tolerability were assessed by
       monitoring adverse events, injection site reactions, and
       laboratory test results.
       >
       > RESULTS:
       >
       > In total, 794 participants were randomized and treated with
       generic drug (n = 353), brand drug
       (n = 357), or placebo (n = 84). The
       estimated mean numbers of gadolinium-enhancing lesions with
       generic drug and brand drug were lower than with placebo (ratio,
       0.488; 95% CI, 0.365-0.651; P&#8201;<&#8201;.001), confirming
       study sensitivity. For gadolinium-enhancing lesions, the
       estimated ratio of generic drug to brand drug was 1.095 (95% CI,
       0.883-1.360), which was within the predefined equivalence margin
       of 0.727 to 1.375.
       >
       > The incidence, spectrum, and severity of reported adverse
       events, including injection site reactions, were similar in the
       generic drug and brand drug groups.
       >
       > CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE:
       >
       > As treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis,
       glatiramer acetate generic drug and brand drug had equivalent
       efficacy, safety, and tolerability.
       --- End Quote ---
       The abstract can be seen here
  HTML http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26458034.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1