URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       MS Speaks
  HTML https://msspeaks.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: DIET AND NUTRITION
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 1258--------------------------------------------------
       Coffee drinking may protect against a couple of cancers but don'
       t drink it too hot
       By: agate Date: June 18, 2016, 6:44 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Medical experts keep changing their minds. After years of
       rumblings about a possible carcinogenic effect of cancer, now
       the word is that coffee drinking might actually protect people
       against a couple of types of cancer. However, drinking any
       beverage when it's too hot might be linked to esophageal cancer.
       From the New York Times, June 15, 2016:
       [quote]Coffee May Protect Against Cancer, W.H.O. Concludes
       By ANAHAD O'CONNOR
       An influential panel of experts convened by the World Health
       Organization concluded on Wednesday that regularly drinking
       coffee could protect against at least two types of cancer, a
       decision that followed decades of research pointing to the
       beverage’s many health benefits. The panel also said there was a
       lack of evidence that it might cause other types of cancer.
       The announcement marked a rare reversal for the panel, which had
       previously described coffee as “possibly carcinogenic” in 1991
       and linked it to bladder cancer. But since then a large body of
       research has portrayed coffee as a surprising elixir, finding
       lower rates of heart disease, Type 2 diabetes, neurological
       disorders and several cancers in those who drink it regularly.
       In their report, the scientists did identify one surprising risk
       for coffee and tea drinkers. They said that drinking “very hot”
       beverages was “probably carcinogenic,” because the practice was
       linked to esophageal cancer in some studies.
       Much of the evidence for coffee’s health benefits stems from
       large epidemiological studies, which cannot prove cause and
       effect. But the favorable findings on coffee consumption have
       been so consistent across numerous studies in recent years that
       many health authorities have endorsed it as part of a healthy
       diet.
       Last year, a panel of scientists that shaped the federal
       government’s 2015 dietary guidelines said there was “strong
       evidence” that three to five cups of coffee daily was not
       harmful, and that “moderate” consumption might reduce chronic
       disease. Another group, the World Cancer Research Fund
       International, reported that coffee protects against multiple
       types of cancer. And several systematic reviews of studies
       involving millions of people have found that regular coffee
       drinkers live longer than others.
       In its report, published Wednesday in Lancet Oncology, the World
       Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on
       Cancer said it had assembled a team of 23 international
       scientists who reviewed more than 1,000 studies. The agency said
       the evidence showed that drinking coffee was unlikely to cause
       several types of cancer, including breast, prostate and
       pancreatic cancers, and that it was associated with a lower risk
       of uterine and liver cancers. For 20 other types of cancer there
       was “inadequate” evidence of a link to cancer, said Dana Loomis,
       the deputy head of the agency’s program that classifies
       carcinogens and the first author of the report.
       Decades ago, the group listed coffee as a “possible carcinogen”
       – along with lead and diesel fuel – because of studies that
       suggested a weak link to bladder and pancreatic cancer. But
       those early studies did not adequately account for higher
       smoking rates among coffee drinkers and, since then, more
       rigorous and better-quality studies have become available, Dr.
       Loomis said. “There is less of a concern today than there was
       before,” he added.
       In its report, the group cited evidence, for example, that
       coffee drinkers’ risk of liver cancer decreases 15 percent “for
       each one cup per day increment.” Still, the group did not give
       coffee a ringing endorsement. It placed coffee in its Group 3
       category for things with “inadequate” evidence of carcinogenic
       potential, such as fluoride, low frequency electric fields, and
       toluene, a solvent used to make nail polish.
       Geoffrey Kabat, a cancer epidemiologist at the Albert Einstein
       College of Medicine in New York, said he felt that the agency
       did not go far enough in its report. He said that coffee had
       been studied in populations across the globe and that studies
       now show a clear lack of evidence of harm. He said the agency
       tends to give greater weight to studies showing harm, even when
       they are outnumbered by many more showing benefit.
       “What the evidence shows over all is that coffee drinking is
       associated with either reduced risk of several cancers or
       certainly no clear increase in other cancers,” he said. “There’s
       a strong signal that this is probably not something that we need
       to be worrying about.”
       Since 1971, the cancer research agency has evaluated nearly
       1,000 environmental and lifestyle factors to determine the
       extent to which they can promote cancer. About 120 have been
       categorized as carcinogenic to humans, including asbestos,
       cigarettes and plutonium. Other things it has classified as
       carcinogenic include wood dust, salted fish and processed meats
       such as bacon, ham and hot dogs.
       But the agency’s reports have at times been controversial.
       Critics have called the agency’s ranking system arcane and
       confusing because it classifies things according to the strength
       of the overall research, not their actual level of danger. Dr.
       Kabat said the assessment system was useful for cancer
       researchers but that it served no utility for the public.
       “I really feel that it’s not contributing to the public good
       because it’s stoking these concerns,” he said.
       Still, the news on coffee is likely to be welcomed by many
       Americans – about 130 million of whom drink coffee every day.
       Around the world, more than 1.6 billion cups of coffee are
       consumed daily, making it one of the world’s most popular drinks
       behind tea.
       The agency said it was not clear why coffee seems to protect
       against at least two types of cancers. But it noted that
       drinking coffee produced “strong antioxidant effects” in
       clinical trials, and that it promoted the death of cancer cells
       in laboratory studies.
       The report’s concerns about “very hot” beverages included
       mention of mate, a type of tea traditionally consumed in South
       America, the Middle East and some parts of Europe, often at high
       temperatures. The agency said that regular consumption of
       beverages hotter than 149 degrees Fahrenheit was “probably
       carcinogenic” based on a small number of studies showing a link
       between the practice and esophageal cancer.
       One reason is that, over time, scalding hot beverages may injure
       cells that line the throat, setting the stage for rare cancers.
       But Dr. Loomis cautioned that the increased risk was seen in
       people who regularly drink their tea or mate at very high
       temperatures, typically at 158 degrees Fahrenheit or greater.
       That is very different from the average tea or coffee drinker in
       the United States and Europe, where coffee is generally consumed
       at temperatures below 140 degrees Fahrenheit. It is also an
       issue that can be easily avoided.
       “Those who are concerned should just wait a few minutes more
       before drinking their drink,” Dr. Loomis said.[/quote]
       *****************************************************