DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Mercy Without Compassion
  HTML https://mercywithoutcompassion.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Profiles
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 157--------------------------------------------------
       Smart roads that glow in the dark
       By: kkshaha cnd Date: September 12, 2023, 3:46 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       One of the main points of his essay is to introduce a difference
       between radicalized conservatism and the extreme right. Although
       you see similar trends in cultural and social terms, you mark a
       distinction in economic terms: in some cases the extreme right
       still maintains statist positions (although it also clarifies
       that there are neoliberal ones), while radicalized conservatism
       is more clearly committed to deregulation. , privatization and
       flexibility.
       To what extent is this support derived, now, from a tradition
       established Phone Number List
  HTML https://asiaemaillist.me/
       the 1970s with the Conservative
       Revolution of Thatcher and Reagan? Indeed, conservatives have
       tended more towards neoliberalism. This does not imply that
       there are no extreme right parties or organizations that also
       assume this neoliberal economic position – in fact, it is clear
       that it happens – although in that field there is a greater mix.
       If in some cases the extreme right takes neoliberal positions,
       in many others it presents itself as the guarantor of the
       Welfare State.
       [img]
  HTML https://scontent.fdac5-2.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/376234703_276480471843544_4706940711438956754_n.jpg?_nc_cat=108&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=49d041&_nc_ohc=FrjMnFHEe3IAX_n_yTO&_nc_ht=scontent.fdac5-2.fna&oh=00_AfA7bGMejJe0WXImB1oo5VCINbBT6TauVwhgiTc8tOl09w&oe=6502FE4E[/img]
  HTML https://asiaemaillist.me/
       This is visible, for example, with the Sweden Democrats, who
       have become the most furious defenders of the Welfare State from
       a chauvinist position: they consider that it should be only for
       Swedes and not for immigrants. This is very different in the
       case of the conservative parties which, as you point out, were
       those that most adapted to (and even propagated) the
       Conservative Revolution of Thatcher and Reagan. These parties
       are not, a priori, interested in supporting welfarism, in which
       they strongly participated during the second post-war consensus.
       *****************************************************