DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
melnyk
HTML https://melnyk.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: First Mandatory Post
*****************************************************
#Post#: 29--------------------------------------------------
Mvill_Lebanon
By: Lebanon Date: March 23, 2012, 10:54 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Who has the right to possess the land of Israel and Palestine?
Explain using the historical/cultural/political reasoning that
reflect your country’s position and beliefs.
We believe that a unified state would be the best way to solve
this issue. Both have a right to the land and the conflict is
generated around it. Simply allotting the land to just one side
will result in more conflict. Further conflict between Israel
and Palestine will inevitability drag other nations in, even
nations that wish to distance themselves from this conflict will
be dragged in via the alliances and agreements they have made.
The outcome of this dispute will affect the entire middle east,
not just simply Israel and Palestine.
Should the international community recognize the statehood of
Palestine? Justify your response.
The entire international community should recognize Palestine as
a state. There are already 112 countries that have done this.
Acknowledging Palestine as a state will help relive the tension
between them and Israel and avoid further bloodshed, which can
easily throw the region into more turmoil
What is your country’s position regarding Iran’s nuclear
program? How should the program be addressed?
We in Lebanon support Iran’s nuclear program. We believe that
they’re intentions with nuclear power is not to make nuclear
weapons but to use it as a power source or for research
purposes. We feel that most of the conflict over this issue is a
result of Israel’s paranoia but also in part of Iran’s refusal
of UN inspectors to see they’re reactors. We believe that the
best way to end the current dispute between Israel and Iran is
to allow a neutral party to inspect the Iranian nuclear reactors
and report on they’re status. Also by allowing someone to
inspect the reactors, Iran can prevent the possibility of an
Israeli attack via resolution 533 of 1990 in the general
conference of the IAEA, which prohibits "all armed attacks
against nuclear installations devoted to peaceful purposes
whether under construction or in operation."
#Post#: 31--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mvill_Lebanon
By: Hamas Date: March 24, 2012, 1:04 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I would like to know your opinion on why the Jews are entitled
to any land in Palestine/Israel.
I do not want to hear "they were there 2000 years ago so they
deserve it now" because 6000 years ago the original people of
Lebanon were Canaanites. Canaanites are believed to be the
original Hebrews. THEREFORE by that logic, they would be
entitled to your land as well. So please, I beseech you to give
me a solid argument on why Israel deserves the land of Israel.
#Post#: 51--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mvill_Lebanon
By: Lebanon Date: March 25, 2012, 7:51 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I believe that both sides should have the land simply because I
believe it will result in the least amount of conflict. Lebanon
is just north of Israel, so any conflict that does occur
eventually splashes onto my country. Simply giving the land to
any 1 side will result in conflict not only between Israel and
Palestine but also they're various allies and that is something
Lebanon simply cannot afford in its current state.
Also don't be deceived by the fact that we do not wish conflict,
we will not allowed Israel to take this country over.
#Post#: 53--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mvill_Lebanon
By: Hamas Date: March 25, 2012, 8:19 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
That's called giving in to terrorism. Using fear of violence to
attain something is textbook terrorism, and you're giving into
it? If the US said they wanted Canadian land, and that they
would start a war, do you just give it to them to 'avoid
conflict?'
#Post#: 56--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mvill_Lebanon
By: Lebanon Date: March 25, 2012, 8:43 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
We are not giving in to terrorism, we are trying to avoid
unnecessary conflict. We are not afraid of conflict, however we
will not waste valuable resources on senseless violence. Make no
mistake, if anyone tries to seize any Lebanese land we will
fight them to protect what is ours.
[quote author=Hamas link=topic=18.msg53#msg53 date=1332724795]
If the US said they wanted Canadian land, and that they would
start a war, do you just give it to them to 'avoid conflict?'
[/quote]
I'm not Canada, but were I in they're position I would defend my
land as it is a direct attack on my country and not a product of
some else's conflict. This is assuming the US is short sighted
and arrogant enough to threaten one of they're long time allies,
in which I can safely say that they haven't fallen that far yet.
*****************************************************