URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       March Madness 2016
  HTML https://marchmadness2016.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: General Discussion
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 85--------------------------------------------------
       Re: East Region 
   DIR By: will
       Date: March 16, 2016, 1:37 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: b_sun link ---
       >
       > Anyone else worried about WVU losing to SFA? That may be their
       toughest game in the bottom half, but in Huggins we trust i
       suppose.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I was worried as well, but WVU kind of seems like a more
       talented, bigger version of SFA themselves. One of those
       "anything you can do we can do better" type matchups even though
       I think SFA's coach is brilliant.
       #Post#: 86--------------------------------------------------
       Re: East Region 
   DIR By: Larry K
       Date: March 16, 2016, 2:51 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: b_sun link ---
       >
       > Anyone else worried about WVU losing to SFA? That may be their
       toughest game in the bottom half, but in Huggins we trust i
       suppose.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Huggins?  Trust?   not me....   but it still is difficult to
       see SFA winning....
       
       #Post#: 89--------------------------------------------------
       Re: East Region 
   DIR By: will
       Date: March 16, 2016, 10:25 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Fun fact for everyone that strikes me as simply
       bizarre...Tuesday night First Four at-large winners are 0-5 in
       the first round, while Wednesday night winners are 5-0. Can
       Michigan keep that streak rolling/can Wichita break what seems
       like a pretty unsustainable streak on their end?
       #Post#: 90--------------------------------------------------
       Re: East Region 
   DIR By: Larry K
       Date: March 17, 2016, 12:06 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       i sure hope so since i took them both :)
       ;D
       #Post#: 91--------------------------------------------------
       Re: East Region 
   DIR By: will
       Date: March 17, 2016, 8:41 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Pretty important thing I only realized right before I fell
       asleep last night - the numbers on Notre Dame are screwed up and
       haven't been updated to include the last two games. They average
       ~75 a game, not 71, so they do not qualify to be upset per the
       Seed Guide...which was the only place I could find that
       recommended an upset. Michigan doesn't qualify to upset them,
       either. As a part-time Michigan fan I'm still rolling with it as
       my only subjective pick, but you might want to change this.
       #Post#: 93--------------------------------------------------
       Re: East Region 
   DIR By: will
       Date: March 17, 2016, 9:56 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Some notes on the four games from this region today...
       Indiana v. Chattanooga: Chattanooga would've been the easiest 12
       upset pick in the field had they played Maryland, but oh well.
       Two huge things play in UTC's factor - Indiana bleeds the ball
       (UTC in 85th percentile of forcing TOs; IND 20th in preventing
       them) and Indiana doesn't go to the line (25th percentile
       nationally in FT Rate). But: the only other team they've faced
       that was 90th percentile or better in eFG% was Iowa State...who
       they lost to 83-63. Just can't see this one happening, but UTC
       will keep it close.
       UNC v. FGCU: FGCU is the best 16 seed, but that doesn't mean
       much when they received the worst 1 seed matchup possible for
       them. UNC could run up a rebound margin of 20+.
       Kentucky v. Stony Brook: Stony Brook is 22-2 over their last 24
       but this is a terrible matchup for them in many ways - Jameel
       Warney is the only good player on SB's team and UK is rounding
       into shape at the perfect time...does this UK team remind anyone
       else of the 2011 version that needed a last-second bucket to
       beat Princeton but went on to upset tournament favorite Ohio
       State in the Sweet Sixteen?
       USC v. Providence: Might be the most intriguing game on the
       schedule today. Not sure why Providence can't get over the hump
       (though I thought they were badly coached down the stretch of
       the Villanova game in the BE Tourney), but USC appears to have
       mailed it in for the final ten games of the season. Zero clue
       which version of which team shows up. I went with USC as
       athletically (and talent-wise) this should be a 5-8 point win
       for them, but motivation counts for quite a bit here. Likely
       will go down to the last possession.
       #Post#: 102--------------------------------------------------
       Re: East Region 
   DIR By: Trashthunderbolt
       Date: March 17, 2016, 11:49 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I have thought about SFA over West Virginia, but chose to waive
       it because West Virginia has a positive turnover margin. While
       West Virginia is not going to force many turnovers, they can
       still pound the glass. And that USC vs. Providence game was
       idiotic. USC reminds me of 10 seed Arizona State when they faced
       7 seed Texas back in 2014. You are up only by one, three seconds
       left, what is the logical defensive strategy? Defend the paint
       of course (90% chance your opponent will inbound close to the
       basket). They left that guy wide open, amazing. Why no respect
       for the PAC-12? Simple: dumb play! Let's not even start with
       Arizona!
       #Post#: 107--------------------------------------------------
       Re: East Region 
   DIR By: twilliams76
       Date: March 18, 2016, 10:27 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Any insight on pitt Wisconsin today?
       #Post#: 108--------------------------------------------------
       Re: East Region 
   DIR By: will
       Date: March 18, 2016, 10:55 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: twilliams76 link ---
       >
       > Any insight on pitt Wisconsin today?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Total tossup, Wisconsin the better team but both faded down the
       stretch and Wisconsin is very thin depth-wise. Pitt has a better
       chance to do damage in the second round, but I picked Wisconsin.
       #Post#: 109--------------------------------------------------
       Re: East Region 
   DIR By: twilliams76
       Date: March 18, 2016, 11:58 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Will I'm in vegas betting these games any games you love?
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 3
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page