URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Love God Only
  HTML https://lovegodonly.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Philosophical Questions
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 9907--------------------------------------------------
       Why?
       By: Mike Date: January 2, 2015, 9:36 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Why is it that we accord far greater value to something that is
       'ancient', or hidden until more recently discovered.
       If I wrote some lengthy diatribe today and hid it in an old well
       or cave, the likelihood is that, if unearthed in several
       thousand years time, its archaic language and outdated thoughts
       would be hailed as being of 'divine' inspiration.
       Whereas today it would be hailed as being the heretical
       ruminations of an idiot.
       We are such silly and superstitious 'sheep', and just grasp out
       for anything ancient that is easy to embrace after so called
       expert translation, and difficult to refute in terms of outdated
       transcript.
       #Post#: 9908--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Why?
       By: Kerry Date: January 2, 2015, 9:57 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       ^ I believe God's truths never change.   If I got an idea today
       that no one ever had before, I would doubt its validity no
       matter how good it seemed to me.  Surely if an idea is true, I
       wouldn't be the first person to have it, would I?  While
       confessing to a degree of vanity, I simply can't dupe myself
       into thinking I'm so special that I could be the first person on
       the earth that God would reveal something to.   I put great
       importance then on finding my ideas being held by people long
       ago.
       I reject some of the early Christian doctrines as "innovations."
       I think some of the ideas that became popular in the first
       three or four centuries of Christianity have nothing to do with
       Jesus, the Apostles, or the books of the Bible.   They were
       inventions by men.   Then skip forward in time to the
       Reformation.  So far as I can see,  they missed a great
       opportunity; but instead of correcting anything, they increased
       the number of errors by even more innovations.   Things have
       gotten worse over time as men invented "new" ideas, fancying
       themselves to be the "first one" to whom God revealed something.
       
       All that being said, Mike,  I see your point; and maybe we
       should remember that madness has been around a long time, just
       as long as wisdom.  As Solomon said, there is nothing new under
       the sun.
       *****************************************************