URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Love God Only
  HTML https://lovegodonly.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Free for All
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 9764--------------------------------------------------
       Extreme PoV's.
       By: Mike Date: December 26, 2014, 3:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I thought the following post from one of my forums, together
       with my reply, to be worth a wider airing.
       [quote author=xxxx link=topic=1887.msg22685#msg22685
       date=1419555631]
       From past times I have been advised to add to my post the words
       'in my opinion', and if it helps you I do so now.
       The things I say now and write may offend some, but I hope not
       since that is not my intention.
       I tell you that this is my opinion but would add that truly , I
       believe this is God's opinion and therefore also mine.
       Have you ever noticed that many of the times when someone was
       healed in the bible, it was someone else who spoke for them (my
       servant needs healing, my son, my mother).
       Sometimes the disciples would bring them to Jesus. Maybe they
       weren't teachers but sometimes I see myself as bringing people
       to the Lord, even some who think they are already baptized and
       know the Lord well.
       So, that is my Opinion.
       [/quote]
       No probs xxxx.
       Forums exist to enable people to express their opinions.....and
       that includes opinions that God has opinions, and that they are
       the same as one's own.
       All members have their own opinions and that even includes me.
       And my opinion is that God permitted a verbally errant,
       incomplete, and far from final, 'text book' to be produced
       because it is his opinion that if he had permitted a verbally
       inerrant, complete and final one to be produced then man would
       use it to form opinions that he could claim to be the same as
       those held by God.
       But that is only my opinion of God's opinion.
       #Post#: 9766--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Extreme PoV's.
       By: Kerry Date: December 26, 2014, 5:18 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I moved  this since another forum and a member at another forum
       are mentioned.
       I wonder how he'd feel if you told him you wanted to bring him
       to Jesus even though he thinks he already knows Jesus well.  I
       wonder how that would fly with him? And tell  him too that you
       are "of the opinion" that your opinion is God's opinion.
       If you ask me, some people need mental help.
       #Post#: 9769--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Extreme PoV's.
       By: Kerry Date: December 26, 2014, 2:16 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Words are symbols of real things.  Words are used to communicate
       ideas about things.  They are not the things.  The  things are
       what are real and true.
       If I see a wonderful moon and want you to see it too, I could
       use words.  I could say, "Look up at the moon."   I could also
       point at it.   All my words and my gesture are wasted if you
       don't look up and see what I see.   On the other hand, I get the
       impression you did see if  if you say, "Wow!"    That lets me
       know you understood my words and that we're in the same reality.
       Words need to relate to reality.
       If I say, "Look up at the moon," and you say, "Why? I've seen it
       before,"  I don't know what's going on with you.  If you say, "I
       looked, I don't see anything,"  I may think you're nuts.
       Sometimes we aren't even meaning the same thing when we use a
       word.
       Religion is a wonderful thing for people who don't want to deal
       with reality.  They can imagine almost is true without the fear
       of "being proved wrong."    You might get locked up if you run
       red lights and tell the police the lights were green; but you
       can say almost anything about religion and get away with it.
       There is no truth in any religion unless the words can
       communicate the reality adequately enough so that the listener
       comes to see the actual reality.   Most of the time, human
       language lacks words that everyone agrees on.  That's because
       people are talking about things they haven't seen.
       Suppose I started talking about woofah-alpocas.   Would you know
       what I meant?   If I talked enough about it, maybe you would
       think you knew; but would you?   No, not if you never saw a
       woofah-alpoca.  If I described them well, you might get a very
       good picture; but you still wouldn't have a perfect idea.  You
       might however get a good enough idea that if you ever did see
       one, you'd know what I had been talking about.   If I gave you
       clues, that might help too.  I could tell you they usually live
       in the ground under trees and prefer oaks.  If you were digging
       under an oak trying to find one, you might know what it was if
       you found it.
       Most religion is nonsense since  leaders seldom can tell us how
       to find out things for ourselves.  Leaders can tell us all kinds
       about angels but not how to see one for ourselves.   They can't
       prove anything -- which is as it ought to be -- but they also
       can't tell us how to find out for ourselves -- which is not as
       it ought to be.   This is the sign of the spiritually blind
       trying to pick up followers by putting on the air of  "I know
       things you don't."    Unfortunately, many spiritually blind
       people who acknowledge they're blind are impressed by such bold
       claims.  They are apt to follow anyone who claims to know
       things; but I say it's all rubbish unless your leaders can tell
       you how to see for yourself.
       If they have seen for themselves -- and I'm serious now --
       wouldn't they know what they did right?  If I grew marigolds  by
       planting seeds in the ground,  shouldn't I be able to tell you
       how I did it?    Then you could go test it yourself.   I could
       give you seeds to plant; and even if you had never seen any of
       my marigolds, you could plant the seeds and see what happens if
       you follow directions.
       The hallmark of the fraudster in religion is that he says he
       knows but he can't tell you how he came to know.   He's blind
       himself; and he  followed blind men who went before him; and
       often he's so convinced he's right, he expects you to follow
       him.
       A genuine teacher will tell you  he relied on the "right
       authorities" in the past and then came to know and to see for
       himself.   This is demonstrated time and again in the Bible; but
       few people seem to pick up on it.
       Peter wasn't always able to communicate with Heaven.  At first
       he depended completely on Jesus.  Peter could be compared to
       that little mustard seed that was first a shrub and then became
       a big tree.   At first, he was low to the ground and got  his
       resources from Jesus.  When he grew up however, he was tall
       enough to "reach into Heaven" for himself.   That speaks volumes
       about the validity of Jesus as a teacher.
       #Post#: 9785--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Extreme PoV's.
       By: HOLLAND Date: December 29, 2014, 6:52 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I would be inclined to think that objects in this world, or,
       rather, that the perceptual grasp of this world is bound up in a
       conceptual grasp of the same and that language and perception go
       together.  How can one understand one without the other?
       Religion is part of a larger conceptual process and is bound up
       in symbolization regarding it: to delineate meanings from it, to
       understand the nature of the mystery about it, and, failing
       that, to enter into philosophy to further explore its meaning.
       I would suggest that religion is the doorway to deeper thought
       analogically much as existentialism is the doorway to further
       growth and development in philosophy.
       I experience the cold and snow and have to shovel +8 inches of
       snow.  I have conceptualized it, defining it as cold contrasting
       it with warmth, and have conceptualized rules of prudence in
       respect to it.  Thus it is with the empirical.  But it is
       existential and finally religious.  It is not merely snow, as it
       relates to a wider meaning of experience, religious meaning and
       symbols interplay with it furthering growth of meaning in
       unexpected ways.  The snow may symbolize the divine or some
       aspect of nature.  Its meaning is not foreclosed but exists in a
       plenitude of meaning that we must awaken to.
       May you all have peace this holiday season!
       *****************************************************