URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Love God Only
  HTML https://lovegodonly.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Free for All
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 12386--------------------------------------------------
       Once a priest, always a priest
       By: Kerry Date: June 21, 2016, 6:44 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I have a question about Catholic teaching.  On one hand, they
       say women can't be ordained priests.  On the other hand, they
       say,   "Once a priest, always a priest."     My question is what
       would  happen  if a male priest had a sex change and became a
       woman?  Does he/she stop being a priest or not?   Just
       wondering. . . .
       #Post#: 12392--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Once a priest, always a priest
       By: Justaname Date: June 21, 2016, 10:19 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I don't understand " once a priest always a priest".
       We have a friend Tony who used to be a priest.  He gave it up
       and became a lawyer. He no longer thinks of himself as a priest.
       My answer to the second question would be a no...he/she, would
       not be who she was before....can't have it both ways.
       I am hearing now that some doctors want the candidate to wait
       ten years before surgery (just do all the rest without the
       surgery part) because they find so many,.. especially those who
       were in their early teens when wanting to change...are changing
       their minds now, and ten years later they want surgery to be
       changed BACK!!
       I do object to it all being done on the Health Plan. Why should
       we have to pay for that...just because it is slotted as an
       'emotional need'...that make me mad. Get your surgery but don't
       involve ME or my taxes!!  :-\
       #Post#: 12394--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Once a priest, always a priest
       By: HOLLAND Date: June 21, 2016, 4:02 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Kerry link=topic=1097.msg12386#msg12386
       date=1466509443]
       I have a question about Catholic teaching.  On one hand, they
       say women can't be ordained priests.  On the other hand, they
       say,   "Once a priest, always a priest."     My question is what
       would  happen  if a male priest had a sex change and became a
       woman?  Does he/she stop being a priest or not?   Just
       wondering. . . .
       [/quote]
       I understand, Kerry, that according to Catholic belief, the
       Catholic priesthood establishes an indelible character to the
       person receiving it.  Once a priest, always a priest.  This it
       is stated in the Catechism of the Catholic Church (1581-1584):
       VII. THE EFFECTS OF THE SACRAMENT OF HOLY ORDERS
       The indelible character
       1581 This sacrament configures the recipient to Christ by a
       special grace of the Holy Spirit, so that he may serve as
       Christ's instrument for his Church. By ordination one is enabled
       to act as a representative of Christ, Head of the Church, in his
       triple office of priest, prophet, and king.
       1582 As in the case of Baptism and Confirmation this share in
       Christ's office is granted once for all. The sacrament of Holy
       Orders, like the other two, confers an indelible spiritual
       character and cannot be repeated or conferred temporarily.74
       1583 It is true that someone validly ordained can, for grave
       reasons, be discharged from the obligations and functions linked
       to ordination, or can be forbidden to exercise them; but he
       cannot become a layman again in the strict sense,75 because the
       character imprinted by ordination is for ever. The vocation and
       mission received on the day of his ordination mark him
       permanently.
       1584 Since it is ultimately Christ who acts and effects
       salvation through the ordained minister, the unworthiness of the
       latter does not prevent Christ from acting.76 St. Augustine
       states this forcefully:
       As for the proud minister, he is to be ranked with the devil.
       Christ's gift is not thereby profaned: what flows through him
       keeps its purity, and what passes through him remains dear and
       reaches the fertile earth. . . . The spiritual power of the
       sacrament is indeed comparable to light: those to be enlightened
       receive it in its purity, and if it should pass through defiled
       beings, it is not itself defiled.77
       I suppose a priest having a sex change to that of a woman would
       still be a priest but no longer authorized to function as such.
       I understand the Catholic church views sex change operations as
       sinful and as being an impediment to the functioning of a
       priest.
       Peace be with you!
       #Post#: 12395--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Once a priest, always a priest
       By: HOLLAND Date: June 21, 2016, 4:22 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Justaname link=topic=1097.msg12392#msg12392
       date=1466522360]
       I don't understand " once a priest always a priest".
       We have a friend Tony who used to be a priest.  He gave it up
       and became a lawyer. He no longer thinks of himself as a priest.
       My answer to the second question would be a no...he/she, would
       not be who she was before....can't have it both ways.[/quote]
       I find it, Justaname, that many think the same as you do.
       Interestingly, many say that they are Catholics.
       [quote][size=14pt]I am hearing now that some doctors want the
       candidate to wait ten years before surgery (just do all the rest
       without the surgery part) because they find so many,..
       especially those who were in their early teens when wanting to
       change...are changing their minds now, and ten years later they
       want surgery to be changed BACK!!
       I do object to it all being done on the Health Plan. Why should
       we have to pay for that...just because it is slotted as an
       'emotional need'...that make me mad. Get your surgery but don't
       involve ME or my taxes!!  :-\
       [/quote]
       I can understand your feelings, but gender identity is not based
       upon emotional needs, though they figure some.  It involves the
       intellect and the apprehension of the intellect that a person's
       gender identity is based an existential apprehension of knowing
       oneself in a certain way.  Call it the positing and intellectual
       recognition of male and female minds and the conflict that
       occurs if mind and body are not in agreement.
       In intersex children, those children who are born with the
       genitalia of both sexes, generally at birth a decision is made
       to surgically remove one of the genitalia so that the affected
       child can grow up in one gender role.  But if the wrong surgical
       decision is made, a child can grow up with a male or female
       mind, but it may not match the body that the child has.  This
       phenomena is undeniable but illustrates that mind and body can
       disagree and that gender is not based upon anatomy.
       I think that the need for this surgery exists.  I do think that
       we are still in the infancy of understanding what is going on
       about sexual identity.
       Peace be with you!
       #Post#: 12399--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Once a priest, always a priest
       By: Kerry Date: June 21, 2016, 10:46 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=HOLLAND link=topic=1097.msg12395#msg12395
       date=1466544141]
       I can understand your feelings, but gender identity is not based
       upon emotional needs, though they figure some.  It involves the
       intellect and the apprehension of the intellect that a person's
       gender identity is based an existential apprehension of knowing
       oneself in a certain way.  Call it the positing and intellectual
       recognition of male and female minds and the conflict that
       occurs if mind and body are not in agreement.
       In intersex children, those children who are born with the
       genitalia of both sexes, generally at birth a decision is made
       to surgically remove one of the genitalia so that the affected
       child can grow up in one gender role.  But if the wrong surgical
       decision is made, a child can grow up with a male or female
       mind, but it may not match the body that the child has.  This
       phenomena is undeniable but illustrates that mind and body can
       disagree and that gender is not based upon anatomy.
       I think that the need for this surgery exists.  I do think that
       we are still in the infancy of understanding what is going on
       about sexual identity.
       Peace be with you!
       [/quote]Few of the people getting operations now were intersex
       babies.
       What is a "female mind"?   If I woke up tomorrow morning and
       found out my body had been magically changed into being female,
       I think I could adjust mentally.   I'd say, "I am not a man so
       the realistic thing to do is adjust."   I don't think I'd want
       an operation to be a man.     It's not been that many years ago
       when "women's rights" groups were telling us there were no
       differences between men and women except the  biology.   Now
       we're being told something else.   Shouldn't our minds inform us
       about what kind of body we have?   I may want a younger body or
       a stronger one, but my mind tells me I have the body I have.  I
       don't want to be a woman -- but I don't think I want to be a man
       so much that I'd want an operation if I suddenly discovered I
       had a female body.  Is it that important?   I don't think it
       should be that important.    I don't think we should judge
       others by what sex they are, so I wonder  why should it be so
       important that people want to have operations over it?
       I was joking at Dominos about it when the bathroom controversy a
       few weeks ago.  I said,  "What if I feel like a dog and want to
       pee outdoors?   Shouldn't I be allowed to go to the bathroom
       outdoors if I feel like a dog?"
       Don't think I'm unsympathetic.  I have a "nephew/niece" who's
       going through this now.    I  worry he/she may regret the
       operations later.   When living as a woman the way she was born,
       she was convinced she was gay.   Now he/she says not.   "She" is
       a woman.   It's going to be hard for me to change the way I
       think about him/her.
       [quote]I suppose a priest having a sex change to that of a woman
       would still be a priest but no longer authorized to function as
       such.[/quote]But women can't be priests!   My guess is they'd
       say they aren't women.
       #Post#: 12400--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Once a priest, always a priest
       By: Kerry Date: June 21, 2016, 11:01 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Justaname link=topic=1097.msg12392#msg12392
       date=1466522360]
       don't understand " once a priest always a priest".[/quote]I see
       HOLLAND explained that rule so I don't need to.
       [quote]We have a friend Tony who used to be a priest.  He gave
       it up and became a lawyer. He no longer thinks of himself as a
       priest.[/quote]Righto, but theoretically he could still
       consecrate the bread and wine.
       [quote]My answer to the second question would be a no...he/she,
       would not be who she was before....can't have it both
       ways.[/quote]Then the "once a priest, always a priest" rule
       wouldn't be true.
       It may be a problem for Catholic theologians either way they
       answer the question.
       #Post#: 12410--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Once a priest, always a priest
       By: Justaname Date: June 22, 2016, 11:27 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The world is so mixed up and confused.  My take is , they can
       all do what they like...but NOT surgery on Canadian Health
       Care!!
       All the lines are so blurred now, nothing is what it seems any
       more. Our grandkids and great grandkids will think this is all
       NORMAL, as this mess will be what they were born into!!!!
       The World is like Alice in Wonderland. Up is down and down is
       up.
       
       #Post#: 12441--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Once a priest, always a priest
       By: HOLLAND Date: June 27, 2016, 1:21 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Kerry link=topic=1097.msg12399#msg12399
       date=1466567190]
       Few of the people getting operations now were intersex
       babies.[/quote]
       Agreed, Kerry.  Intersex babies are brought up to illustrate
       that gender identification is not based upon genitilia but upon
       mental activity in conjunction or apart from it.
       [quote]What is a "female mind"?   If I woke up tomorrow morning
       and found out my body had been magically changed into being
       female, I think I could adjust mentally.   I'd say, "I am not a
       man so the realistic thing to do is adjust."   I don't think I'd
       want an operation to be a man.     It's not been that many years
       ago when "women's rights" groups were telling us there were no
       differences between men and women except the  biology.   Now
       we're being told something else.   Shouldn't our minds inform us
       about what kind of body we have?   I may want a younger body or
       a stronger one, but my mind tells me I have the body I have.  I
       don't want to be a woman -- but I don't think I want to be a man
       so much that I'd want an operation if I suddenly discovered I
       had a female body.  Is it that important?   I don't think it
       should be that important.    I don't think we should judge
       others by what sex they are, so I wonder  why should it be so
       important that people want to have operations over it?[/quote]
       I can understand your skepticism but gender identity seems to
       not be a matter of human decision at all but a matter of
       realization, an awakening to a sense of sexual identity.  The
       inner conflict regarding that identity is what leads many to
       make the gender reassignment surgery to try to make their
       genitilia to conform to their inner identity as such.  The
       confusion about how to relate to others and the need to conform
       to conventional sexual roles is behind the surgery.
       [quote]I was joking at Dominos about it when the bathroom
       controversy a few weeks ago.  I said,  "What if I feel like a
       dog and want to pee outdoors?   Shouldn't I be allowed to go to
       the bathroom outdoors if I feel like a dog?"[/quote]
       ;D  But gender identity and an identification of being another
       separate kind of being are too different things so the analogy
       fails.
       [quote]Don't think I'm unsympathetic.  I have a "nephew/niece"
       who's going through this now.    I  worry he/she may regret the
       operations later.   When living as a woman the way she was born,
       she was convinced she was gay.   Now he/she says not.   "She" is
       a woman.   It's going to be hard for me to change the way I
       think about him/her.   But women can't be priests!   My guess is
       they'd say they aren't women.
       [/quote]
       I think, Kerry, why so many are skeptical about all this is the
       fact that there are not only transgender people but trigender
       people.  Transgender people identify themselves as having a
       sexual identity apart or different from their genitilia.
       Trigender people can experience sexual identity that includes
       both the genders and some or all of the sexual orientations of
       those genders.  Surgery is affected on the former to correct or
       resolve the condition; surgery is useless for trigender persons
       since they already have in place the genitilia for one of those
       genders.  I would suggest that you be patient with your
       nephew/niece.  Hopefully he/she has properly recognized
       himself/herself as properly transgender and not trigender or
       he/she will find out that he/she has made a bad mistake
       regarding the surgery.
       If a priest goes through sexual reassignment surgery, I think
       under canon law that he will still be a priest because the
       Catholic church does not recognize sexual reassignment surgery
       as a change in gender.  This is kind of odd. when you have to
       conclude that perhaps the only kind of woman priest the Catholic
       church could accept would be what they would consider as a man
       simulating the female gender through surgery.
       Peace be with you!
       #Post#: 12442--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Once a priest, always a priest
       By: HOLLAND Date: June 27, 2016, 1:30 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Justaname link=topic=1097.msg12410#msg12410
       date=1466612839]
       The world is so mixed up and confused.  My take is , they can
       all do what they like...but NOT surgery on Canadian Health
       Care!!
       All the lines are so blurred now, nothing is what it seems any
       more. Our grandkids and great grandkids will think this is all
       NORMAL, as this mess will be what they were born into!!!!
       The World is like Alice in Wonderland. Up is down and down is
       up.
       
       [/quote]
       I think that they will get used to it, Justaname.  Gender roles
       and issues and intersex babies that the development of DNA
       research will blur the lines even more over time.  With DNA gene
       modification and the creation of new species and the increased
       viewing of the human species as a being that is subject to
       modification, mutation and change, a being that is mallable, to
       be shaped by how the species' wants it to be.  It will be
       frightening, though, as humankind takes up the role of the
       creator in respect to itself in respect to technology; that will
       be sobering.
       This issue about sex change is only the tip of the incoming
       iceberg.
       Peace be with you!
       #Post#: 12449--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Once a priest, always a priest
       By: Kerry Date: June 28, 2016, 1:49 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=HOLLAND link=topic=1097.msg12441#msg12441
       date=1467051687]
       Agreed, Kerry.  Intersex babies are brought up to illustrate
       that gender identification is not based upon genitilia but upon
       mental activity in conjunction or apart from it.   [/quote]I may
       be a bit dim here; but I still don't get it.   The word "gender"
       used this way in a novelty.   The word used to refer to
       grammar:  masculine, feminine and neuter.   The idea that gender
       as something  existing  in people's heads is a new idea.
       There are cultures, to be sure, where people have identified
       with the opposite sex.   Indeed some girls are reared as boys in
       some parts of Pakistan and Afghanistan. Naturally this causes
       them some problems adjusting when they hit puberty and then are
       expected to dress and act like women.
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bacha_posh
       Some Indian tribes had men who lived as women their whole lives
       -- even marrying men.  But I still don't get your point.
       [quote]I can understand your skepticism but gender identity
       seems to not be a matter of human decision at all but a matter
       of realization, an awakening to a sense of sexual identity.  The
       inner conflict regarding that identity is what leads many to
       make the gender reassignment surgery to try to make their
       genitilia to conform to their inner identity as such.  The
       confusion about how to relate to others and the need to conform
       to conventional sexual roles is behind the surgery.   [/quote]
       What I see is that how a person thinks about himself or herself
       and how others think about him or her can sometimes cause
       trouble.
       [quote] ;D  But gender identity and an identification of being
       another separate kind of being are too different things so the
       analogy fails. [/quote]The statement that people should be
       allowed to use whatever bathroom they feel comfortable in lies
       behind my analogy.   If that statement is true, then people who
       identify as animals should be allowed to act like animals.
       My belief is that people should use the bathroom which will
       cause the least problems for others.   I think most transgender
       people already do that.    If you have the genitals of one sex,
       you shouldn't be  going into  bathrooms, lockerrooms or showers
       of the sex your body doesn't resemble, Saying "But I feel this
       way" really doesn't cut it with me.  I repeat I think most
       transgender people do want to use the bathrooms which will cause
       the least amount of problems.
       [quote]I think, Kerry, why so many are skeptical about all this
       is the fact that there are not only transgender people but
       trigender people.  Transgender people identify themselves as
       having a sexual identity apart or different from their
       genitilia. [/quote]
       People can imagine almost anything; but it doesn't make it so.
       If you feel like a girl and want to be a girl, you are still a
       boy if you have the genitals of a boy.  That's a simple fact
       that wishful thinking doesn't change.
       [quote]Trigender people can experience sexual identity that
       includes both the genders and some or all of the sexual
       orientations of those genders.  Surgery is affected on the
       former to correct or resolve the condition; surgery is useless
       for trigender persons since they already have in place the
       genitilia for one of those genders.  I would suggest that you be
       patient with your nephew/niece.  Hopefully he/she has properly
       recognized himself/herself as properly transgender and not
       trigender or he/she will find out that he/she has made a bad
       mistake regarding the surgery.[/quote]I don't care how people
       think about themselves -- that's fine with me.  They are free to
       think however they want.   The line I draw is when someone
       becomes unrealistic.   If a man wants to have an operation and
       look like a woman, okay do it -- but until he gets the operation
       and looks like a woman, the fact is he's a man.  To me, that's
       as simple as an obese person having a fantasy about being thin.
       If someone wants to be thin, by all means do something about it.
       Don't sit around and think that fantasying about it is going to
       make it true -- there is no point is saying, "I am a thin person
       trapped in a fat body."
       [quote]If a priest goes through sexual reassignment surgery, I
       think under canon law that he will still be a priest because the
       Catholic church does not recognize sexual reassignment surgery
       as a change in gender.  This is kind of odd. when you have to
       conclude that perhaps the only kind of woman priest the Catholic
       church could accept would be what they would consider as a man
       simulating the female gender through surgery.[/quote]I think
       they'd have to consider such a person as remaining a man.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page