DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
LetsTalkAboutTheWorld
HTML https://letstalkabouttheworld.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Humanities
*****************************************************
#Post#: 11--------------------------------------------------
KTS morons and their 'ideas'
By: polishyouth Date: December 8, 2020, 12:30 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote]Degenerates and philosophy:
***Words are never limited by the experienced, tangible world.
If they can seduce, manipulate, comfort, or empower, then that
is their only standard of evaluating their veracity, i.e.,
utility.
As always; the idiot accuses an intangible 'person'(to avoid
having to explain themselves away and defending the paranoid
morons insanities against an actual tangible accused persons) of
a very tangible and, almost, self-evident 'wrong'(over
simplistic and too vague to be taken seriously). A perfect combo
for the paranoid morons psychology, concrete and unfalsifiable
accusations towards parties that can not defend, and as an
extension: prove wrong, themselves against the kooks
'accusations'.
***Sometimes philosophy is about grand all-inclusive
generalizations that apply to all, and exclude nobody, then, at
other times, when what is revealed is threatening, i.e.,
negative, no generalities apply; all is personal, and a separate
and subjective philosophy has to be invented for each and every
individual.
The moron is confused...who ever claimed that 'philosophy' was
'all about' 'generalisations' or, conversely, 'exceptions'???The
cretin demands that somebody else clears up his own confusion
and defends themselves against accusations the idiot wants the
accused to straw-man against himself...
***If not god, or any other version of the absolute positive,
then man is the creator of his own positive absolute.
Philosophy need only create a self-consiustent plausible
alternative, and the only criterion is not reason or integrity,
but feelings and pleasures.
If it feels good, or can potentially produce such payback, then
it is 'true"; if it feels bad, and no potential for a pleasing
return is distinguished, then it is "false".
Feminized philosophy, for young & old women, getting older, and
for young men-children refusing to grow up.
God...absolute...feminized...who refuses to grow up?, people who
run on their children to spam pseudo-philosophy boards with
idiotic bullshit and act like they are 85 when they are not even
60?, or the 'people' like 'your' 'nihilists'(meaning anybody the
idiot dislikes and distrusts)?[/quote]
*****************************************************