DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
Lets Make a Game Together
HTML https://letsmakeagametogether.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Propositions
*****************************************************
#Post#: 2316--------------------------------------------------
Re: Spidium (ready to be Voted on) (no < Comment 14 votes
count)
DIR By: cofagragus
Date: September 21, 2013, 11:33 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Yah no I think he meant Namines Squirrel and the Cover
Legends/Gazciet. Actually just because its radioactive doesnt
mean it has to be high BST. Also we still need (if not already
having) two 600 BST strongmons like Metagross and Salamence.
#Post#: 2317--------------------------------------------------
Re: Spidium (ready to be Voted on) (no < Comment 14 votes
count)
DIR By: Eneomas
Date: September 21, 2013, 12:00 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
actually, I did mean Your very first mon created, which in your
case is Gazceit. (Sorry for the inconvenience, but I think most
people make high BST mons first, then lower ones)
(also, I thought we had those cofag, js)
#Post#: 2318--------------------------------------------------
Re: Spidium (ready to be Voted on) (no < Comment 14 votes
count)
DIR By: Snaquaza
Date: September 21, 2013, 12:04 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Cofagrigus, we actually already have 3 Pseudo Legends
#Post#: 2319--------------------------------------------------
Re: Spidium (ready to be Voted on) (no < Comment 14 votes
count)
DIR By: cofagragus
Date: September 21, 2013, 1:23 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Oh ok just wanted to check for incase I accidentally propose a
high BST mon. Eh this mon isnt going anywhere soon so if I didnt
vote negative before I am now. BTW my name is cofagragus not
cofagrigus lol
#Post#: 2345--------------------------------------------------
Re: Spidium (ready to be Voted on) (no < Comment 14 votes
count)
DIR By: EhhhN
Date: September 22, 2013, 7:44 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Wow, that is a great method of evolution from Base to Stage 1,
very interesting. The moves on all of them are really nice, i
think that you hit the nail on the head with all of the moves
and TMs. However, I think that the Special Defense stat is
wayyyyyy too high on Stage 2. Radioactivity doesn't mean
overpoweredness, but it is legit. Aren't there already a ton of
bug types though? I'm glad you change Stage 2 to Poison/Psychic,
interesting typing. Otherwise, I could see this in the game,
wouldn't hurt to vote yes.
#Post#: 2348--------------------------------------------------
Re: Spidium (ready to be Voted on) (no < Comment 14 votes
count)
DIR By: Eneomas
Date: September 22, 2013, 10:13 am
---------------------------------------------------------
It actually is the way to go from stage 1-->2...
The bug problem: 1 most of SOP's mons were bug type, and thus,
we are missing some, aside from that, 2 slots are open anyways,
so no problem there.
Lastly, overpoweredness? with 70 HP? and 50 defence? and 70
speed? and wow, never thought one high stat would cause so much
discussion...
Anyways, appeasing time, I'll change magic bounce to unnerve,
change special defence to 140, and attack to 92 (BST 524, still
in pattern!), and remove recover, as it bugs (unintentional pun)
me :/ . In theory, it could never recover from radioactiveness,
so the move is a bit of here. Also finally made my mind up upon
it's DW ability: Levitate. I hope that's not broken?
Better?
#Post#: 2350--------------------------------------------------
Re: Spidium (ready to be Voted on) (no < Comment 14 votes
count)
DIR By: cofagragus
Date: September 22, 2013, 1:25 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
bloopey bloop positive looks better
#Post#: 2351--------------------------------------------------
Re: Spidium (ready to be Voted on) (no < Comment 14 votes
count)
DIR By: Eneomas
Date: September 23, 2013, 7:07 am
---------------------------------------------------------
might I ask to bold your votes, as is the procedure?
#Post#: 2352--------------------------------------------------
Re: Spidium (ready to be Voted on) (no < Comment 14 votes
count)
DIR By: Snaquaza
Date: September 23, 2013, 10:06 am
---------------------------------------------------------
non-Bolded votes might not get counted so, Mons might (not) get
accepted while they actually weren't
#Post#: 2353--------------------------------------------------
Re: Spidium (ready to be Voted on) (no < Comment 14 votes
count)
DIR By: Eneomas
Date: September 23, 2013, 10:12 am
---------------------------------------------------------
counting all votes >14:
Positive: 2 (Cofagragus & Naminé)
Negative: 1 ( Champion Steve)
Previously Negative, now Neutral: 1 (Snaquaza)
*****************************************************
Page 4 of 6
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page