URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Lets Make a Game Together
  HTML https://letsmakeagametogether.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Propositions
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 1980--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hedgehoft ,Furrike & Cushown (first glance, W.I.P.)
   DIR By: Eagle4
       Date: August 30, 2013, 1:15 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Negative
       150/150/150 defenses with an immunity to status, with workable
       offenses and access to sleep talk means that this guy will be
       too trollish and hard to take down (not to mention being rather
       annoying more than anything else). For Hedgehoft and Furrike,
       I'd work on the stats due to the fact that having a low a dump
       stat as 20 is BST abuse; try and simplify the stats and make
       them more realistic :)
       #Post#: 1982--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hedgehoft ,Furrike & Cushown (first glance, W.I.P.)
   DIR By: Eneomas
       Date: August 30, 2013, 1:41 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       First off, why does nobody know what W.I.P stands for. Work In
       Progress, it should not be voted on. Second off, i've heard the
       extreme stat problem before. It might be huge, but it lacks
       recovery, and it's moves are randomised each turn! It could use
       Wild Charge on a gastrodon, or focus punch on Gengar. It could
       be lucky, but it could be awful. It's gimmicky alright, but it's
       supposed to be the ability hinder mon. Lastly, Taunt! If you
       taunt it (not a hard job considering the 60 speed stat), it's
       useless, and can easily be set up on.
       And I Will want to ask you all, stop voting please, it's good to
       see how people see it (either extremely positive, or extremely
       negative), but it doesn't even have it's moves. I'll try to
       lighten up some matters, and try to make it more... strange-ish
       #Post#: 1996--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hedgehoft ,Furrike & Cushown (first glance, W.I.P.)
   DIR By: cofagragus
       Date: August 30, 2013, 5:48 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Honestly it would be good to have 120/120/120 Defenses and OK
       offenses, so ppl dont complain. And I still dont get the evo
       method :/
       #Post#: 1999--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hedgehoft ,Furrike & Cushown (first glance, W.I.P.)
   DIR By: Snaquaza
       Date: August 30, 2013, 6:22 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       oh prevos have unbalanced stats even more
       #Post#: 2000--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hedgehoft ,Furrike & Cushown (first glance, W.I.P.)
   DIR By: cofagragus
       Date: August 30, 2013, 6:36 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thats right.... if they're accepted they'll need LOTS of
       revision after I think 'bout it. So I, meh, think it should be
       revised before it gets voted on.
       #Post#: 2008--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hedgehoft ,Furrike & Cushown (first glance, W.I.P.)
   DIR By: Eneomas
       Date: August 31, 2013, 4:52 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       3 words: Work In Progress.
       'Nough said
       #Post#: 2335--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hedgehoft, Phogwer ,Furrike & Cushown (first glance,
       W.I.P.)
   DIR By: cofagragus
       Date: September 21, 2013, 4:18 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Yeah after I think about it leave his mon alone it deserves a
       chance, we dont even know how it would perform in competitive
       play
       #Post#: 3128--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hedgehoft, Phogwer ,Furrike & Cushown (first glance,
       W.I.P.)
   DIR By: EhhhN
       Date: November 5, 2013, 10:21 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       For the two split evos, that's just a bit too low. We aren't
       trying to reincarnate Deoxys-Attack. I mean, it's fine, but
       you're going to need serious time for boosting and a defensive
       ability in order to even stay alive. Cushown has a really neat
       ability, but is always wasting a moveslot with Sleep Talk, which
       could be used for a vital Rest or power-up move in order to
       destroy everything. However, it will act like Giratina's HP
       combined with Registeel's defenses to wall like an animal.
       Literally ;)
       #Post#: 3131--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hedgehoft, Phogwer ,Furrike & Cushown (first glance,
       W.I.P.)
   DIR By: Snaquaza
       Date: November 5, 2013, 11:17 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       4 Mons? either strange split or not possible, also isn't this a
       bit of a stolen concept of Nincada, maybe try to make the
       concept a bit easier ^_^
       #Post#: 3250--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hedgehoft, Furrike & Cushown (first glance, W.I.P.)
   DIR By: TheBurgerking99
       Date: November 17, 2013, 11:29 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I say make the 150's 120. That way it's not too powerful, while
       still being insanely bulky. Not that hard of a fix.
       *****************************************************
       Page 3 of 4
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page