DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
Kanagaroo Kort
HTML https://kangarookort.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Property
*****************************************************
#Post#: 42--------------------------------------------------
Reste Realty Corp v. Cooper
DIR By: SunsetSailor
Date: January 27, 2011, 10:36 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
RULE:
* Where there is such a covenant, whether express or
implied, and it is breached substantially by the landlord, the
courts have applied the doctrine of constructive eviction as a
remedy for the tenant. Under this rule any act or omission of
the LL or of anyone who act under authority or legal right from
the LL, or of someone having superior title to that of the LL,
which renders the premises substantially unsuitable for the
purpose for which they are leased, or which seriously interferes
with the beneficial enjoyment of the premises, is a breach of
the covenant of quiet enjoyment and constitutes a constructive
eviction of the tenant… (425)
1. MUST BE SUBSTANTIAL (act or omission by LL that
renders the premises unsuitable & interfere w/ enjoyment of
them) & MUST BE PERMANENT…if it is not substantial, the T is
liable and the lease continues
2. Majority Rule: Covenant of quiet enjoyment is
implied
3. Right of constructive eviction arises when there is
a substantial interference, and the T informs the LL about it,
and the LL does nothing.
* After constructive evictionIf T waits too long to
leave, he waives his right to constructive eviction (must leave
w/in a reasonable period of time)
1. LL must have notice of the problem & have
opportunity to cure
2. Remedies for Constructive Eviction:
o T should be entitled to seek lesser remedies
than just terminating the lease (can stay in possession and sue
for damages)
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 1