DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Kanagaroo Kort
  HTML https://kangarookort.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Property
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 12--------------------------------------------------
       Jacque v. Steenberg Homes, Inc
       By: kangaroo Date: January 26, 2011, 6:09 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       -
       company access to their lands in order to bring a mobile home
       through, the Steenberg company cut through the land anyway
       -
       damages
       -
       -
       could not reinstate the punitive damages
       -
       (1)
       took the mobile home over the snow an no actual damages to the
       land could be found (nominal damages of $1)
       (2)
       $100,000
       (3)
       support punitive damages: what the supreme court does is says
       that Nominal damages are enough to warrant Punitive damages
       -
       his or her land is ‘one of the most essential sticks in the
       bundle of rights that are commonly characterized as property’
       -
       enjoyment of his own property for any purpose which does not
       invade the rights of another person
       -
       remedy->General Principle
       *****************************************************