DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
Ground Zero Gaming Forum
HTML https://kamcraft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Polls
*****************************************************
#Post#: 1997--------------------------------------------------
Claim blocks.
By: imamthorburn Date: September 4, 2014, 2:37 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Just wanted to know if there is an official rule on taking claim
blocks. Now with the air drops they are so common.
lets take Pitchburns group and RIP were in the same small city
Pitch burn is expanding quit nicely but we also want to expand.
If the claim block is not protecting the main base structure It
should be ok to remove his so we can take that territory. To me
it adds more conflict and fun saying hey we just took over your
territory.
I personally have know problem with it
Curious of what others think.
Im sure the taking main base ones falls in the don't be a d I c
k rule. But what about the others.
#Post#: 2000--------------------------------------------------
Re: Claim blocks.
By: Aknot Date: September 4, 2014, 5:23 am
---------------------------------------------------------
hmmmm
Good topic. I had claim blocks in the double digits so when I
started moving into the Police station I was putting them like
every 7 blocks...... claim block protecting my claim block yo.
It is of my opinion it goes this way with regards to taking a
stance against someones property:
1. If it is in/near/around a POI regardless of Stop Sign status
it is open for 'attack'.
2. If it is away from a POI and has Stop signs clearly posted it
should not be touched.
So with that if you are in a city ANYTHING (eve a base) created
by a player is open reign when it comes to
raiding/looting/destroying..... Obviously if it appears to be
their base you dont want to go to far overboard. If it is a hub
or a layover.... meh.
There is a war section feel free to declare against others....
#Post#: 2019--------------------------------------------------
Re: Claim blocks.
By: Madman Date: September 4, 2014, 8:36 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Here is how I personally feel about this;
We are in an infinitely generating world so it really doesn't
make sense to compete for the same space unless two or more
parties have decided that this "war" for space is agreed upon. I
don't think that a player should be able to protect anything but
their base with keystones. If you just place a keystone to
expand your area to prevent building with out a base above it
then I think that keystone becomes lootable.
#Post#: 2022--------------------------------------------------
Re: Claim blocks.
By: The3rdMan Date: September 4, 2014, 8:44 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=imamthorburn link=topic=259.msg1997#msg1997
date=1409816267]
Just wanted to know if there is an official rule on taking claim
blocks. Now with the air drops they are so common.
lets take Pitchburns group and RIP were in the same small city
Pitch burn is expanding quit nicely but we also want to expand.
If the claim block is not protecting the main base structure It
should be ok to remove his so we can take that territory. To me
it adds more conflict and fun saying hey we just took over your
territory.
I personally have know problem with it
Curious of what others think.
Im sure the taking main base ones falls in the don't be a d I c
k rule. But what about the others.
[/quote]
I like the idea personally. It makes it a pseudo capture the
flag type mission. Gives a reason to compete. Not to mention
a serious challenge and a much harder mission to accomplish than
stealing one item from a persons chest. Or rearranging there
furniture.
I think not destroying their base in the process would be a
challenge unless those claim blocks are clearly put out to grab.
Interesting question, and obviously MM's decree in the end
rules. Just academic, but I see it as an interested idea.
*****************************************************