DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
INVISIBLE GURU FORUM
HTML https://jedmckenna.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Member Posts
*****************************************************
#Post#: 35340--------------------------------------------------
Re: universe, neurosis & me
DIR By: Jed McKenna
Date: August 9, 2018, 1:07 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Will is a concept, a creation of mind... how could will be part
of Truth. Remember, what arises eventually falls, and nothing
that arises or falls is anything but illusion.
Contemplate.
Love ya, Jed.
#Post#: 35355--------------------------------------------------
Re: universe, neurosis & me
DIR By: morrinow
Date: August 10, 2018, 7:40 am
---------------------------------------------------------
In SIE you write that H/A provides one with the ability to
contact his higher self. Can you please specify what do you mean
by "higher self". God? And how does this contacting occur?
#Post#: 35368--------------------------------------------------
Re: universe, neurosis & me
DIR By: Jed McKenna
Date: August 11, 2018, 2:03 am
---------------------------------------------------------
You are asking me to put into words that which is so far beyond
words you cannot imagine it.
Find a contemplation and stick with it. Your questions are all
mental artifacts. Don't waste your time seeking control.. and
that is all the mind wants. T/R means its destruction so how can
you expect mind to assist you.
Love ya, Jed.
#Post#: 35413--------------------------------------------------
Re: universe, neurosis & me
DIR By: morrinow
Date: August 13, 2018, 6:00 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Why do you put such an emphasis on T/R whereas in your books you
explicitly advice your readers to stay away from T/R and go for
H/A? You got me convinced, Jed, I'm not interested in T/R. All I
ask from you is to help me getting a vivid idea of what the
essentials of H/A are, how a human adult navigates through life
and how things work in this dualistic universe, just like you
help Lisa in your dialogues.
So maybe you can help me with this one: When Maggie asks you to
answer her questions you first say "no", because, as you write,
it's not indicated. What I don't understand is - isn't Maggie's
question already the indication? So why do you block the flow of
unfolding events at the beginning by saying "no" instead of just
letting it happen? Or, in more general terms: What does it need
to take things as "indicated", if a request by someone
represents no indication?
Would help me a lot if you could give a straight answer to this.
Thanks in advance!
#Post#: 35420--------------------------------------------------
Re: universe, neurosis & me
DIR By: Jed McKenna
Date: August 14, 2018, 3:23 am
---------------------------------------------------------
There are two ''varieties'' of what is called indication. They
might appear the same, especially to those who don't know what's
going on. The first is when a mind says ''let's do this'' or
words to that effect, and if there is a mind involved there is
definitely Maya involved. The second is when a person who live
beyond the mind gets a sense of what is appropriate. When that
happens there is no Maya, no ego, not alternative intentions or
outcomes desired.
The first indication is contaminated with mind, the second only
with love. To the ''man in the street'' the difference is
invisible, to one who realizes that the ''street is in the man''
it is usually readily apparent what is going on.
Love ya, Jed
#Post#: 35423--------------------------------------------------
Re: universe, neurosis & me
DIR By: morrinow
Date: August 14, 2018, 10:55 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Ok so that means that one must become a person "who lives beyond
the mind", like before that it's not possible to get a sense of
what's indicated? And does that mean that living beyond the mind
is a necessary component without which there is no H/A?
#Post#: 35428--------------------------------------------------
Re: universe, neurosis & me
DIR By: Jed McKenna
Date: August 15, 2018, 7:48 am
---------------------------------------------------------
You are already living beyond the mind... there is no mind, but
you can pretend to be living within it. Pretending is not Truth.
Love ya, Jed.
#Post#: 35444--------------------------------------------------
Re: universe, neurosis & me
DIR By: morrinow
Date: August 16, 2018, 6:57 am
---------------------------------------------------------
You say I already live beyond the mind as there is no mind. Ok.
So that means everybody lives beyond the mind, but then I don't
understand how there ever can be (a non-existing) mind involved
in indication ??? thus your distinction between those two types
of indication (one with mind involved and one without that)
doesn't really seem well-founded.
And is your pre-previous answer suggesting that whenever there
is Mind/Maya involved, it's not the kind of indication which you
act upon? Like in the book when Maggie asked you to answer her
questions you didn't take that as indication, because there was
mind involved, so you didn't act upon it. Did I get you right on
this? You only act upon indications which have no Mind/Maya
involved (i.e. indication of the second type according to your
distinction), is that correct?
#Post#: 35445--------------------------------------------------
Re: universe, neurosis & me
DIR By: Jed McKenna
Date: August 17, 2018, 12:44 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Definitely yes and no. You are mistaking the outer for the inner
and the inner for the outer.
Waste of non-existent time.
Love ya, Jed.
#Post#: 35452--------------------------------------------------
Re: universe, neurosis & me
DIR By: morrinow
Date: August 17, 2018, 4:47 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"definitely yes and no" - it's not just yes and no, but
DEFINITELY ;D ;D ;D you've definitely got me with this one!
[emoji23]
so I'd like to see if you could help me with another obscurity
that emerged reading warfare. You write if there emerged a zit
just at prom night, you would try to cover it or get it removed,
but you wouldn't make anything wrong out of it. But doesn't
trying to hide or remove it mean to make it a wrong thing? How
can you fight something without making anything wrong out of it?
*****************************************************
Page 3 of 4
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page