URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       INVISIBLE GURU FORUM
  HTML https://jedmckenna.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Truth Realization
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 25794--------------------------------------------------
       Jed Rant: On Right Action
   DIR By: Jed McKenna
       Date: December 4, 2016, 10:53 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Here is a response to a member's post with a little verbal
       diahoriea thrown in. I hallucinate that it might be of value to
       others so generalized it into a rant. The member's inquiry was
       something like ''What's a good source of info on right action.''
       Well... I think you just hooked me... here goes...
       Who would determine what is ''right''? There is no ''you'' and
       there is definitely no free will. You don't even know what your
       next thought will be, much less what you are going to do about
       it... because it's not ''your'' thought. You can't control these
       "thoughts", much less your subsequent actions. Just try to stop
       thinking for a few minutes... really try. Set about to spent ten
       minutes not thinking and not doing. In my experiene there is no
       such thing as ''right action''  :o :o :o
       If one assumes there is a ''right'' action there must be a
       ''wrong'' action because this human experience is based on
       polarities. The ancient Yin/Yang concept models this out
       remarkably well as far as the human experience goes. ''Right''
       action simply cannot be with a balancing/counter ''wrong''
       action.  From the human perspective I admit that the actions may
       appear, but that is an appearance that disappearances itself
       upon contemplation.
       Such a term eagerly lends itself to those who want to manipulate
       you into believe that some action, usually one they propose but
       seldom live by, is right (for you!). That's just a load of
       (please fill in you own words and make it as graphic as you
       wish).
       But wait... he said with baited breath... I might be wrong. It
       is, in my experience, truthish, that I am always 100% wrong and
       100% right, and so are you. Could this be  ??? ??? ???
       So... what if every action is/was a ''right action''? What if
       there is no such thing as a wrong action? What is ''right'' and
       ''wrong'' are just made up by mind... and  excellent source of
       endless judgment, thinking, conceptualizing, story telling,
       blaming, guilt, monkey-mind and good old-fashion entertainment
       when understood and put in proper context.
       You are 100% responsible and never at fault or guilty of
       anything!  :o :o :o I suggest you will find that a "right"
       understanding, perhaps even ''Truthish", if you seek something
       to live by. BUT, keep in mind, it applies to every other human
       appearance as well. Nobody is at fault or guilty of anything
       what-so-ever. Lawyers are welcome to join the forum at this
       point  :-\ :P :-*.
       A more important facet of this discussion lies in what is going
       on in you right now. Watch how your
       Mayanic/ego-oriented-non-existent mind wants to argue against
       the above assertions. You might even have a little grammar
       teacher in your head saying something like ''Geez Jed, what kind
       of grammar rules are you following  :P :P :P ?" I don't follow
       others and have few rules... I just do and that seems to be
       quite sufficient, for me, because ''I'' am not in charge. I
       suggest that such an approach is also sufficient for you.  ;) ;)
       ;) ... perhaps it's even a ''right'' action  :P :P :P. It may
       even be exactly what is happening in your apparent life with
       sans awareness of it.
       If you really want to know about ''right'' and ''wrong'' action,
       do what you think is right and only do that. Never, ever do
       another action that you think is ''wrong''. How simple (and
       difficult) can that be :-\ :-\ :-\ ? After a given action listen
       to your body, listen to your stories, let all ''others'' be
       without fault or guilt and stop listening to a pack of wolves
       leading you to a shearing via NABS (New Age Bull S h i t) and
       hideously distorted religions and philosophical teachings. The
       answer to all questions lies within you, in fact, everything is
       within you.. there is no ''out there'' ''out there''. How could
       you possibly do ''wong'' when there is no one to do wrong to.
       How can a concept/thought/memory hurt anyone... be ''wrong'' in
       any way? It doesn't even exists.
       Your thoughts are welcome below... but I request you keep in
       mind they aren't ''yours''... they could be expressed more
       accurately as ''our'' thoughts... or maybe ''just'' thoughts.
       Thinking about this can lead one to not wanting to express much
       at all, not feeling a need to, and that is also a perfectly
       ''right'' and perfectly ''wrong'' action.
       I also recommendd listening intently to what others say but
       never believing them... and the wiser amoug you will listen
       intently to themselves and also never believe a word their mind
       says. How could one believe something that doesn't exist? Beyond
       me...  :P :o 8).
       Love ya, Jed
       #Post#: 25806--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Jed Rant: On Right Action
   DIR By: FractalJackal
       Date: December 5, 2016, 5:49 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It's been "my" experience that no one does anything "wrong"
       given their model of the world. Who would look at something and
       think "this is definitely 100% wrong, but I'm going to do it
       anyway"?
       Besides, labeling something "right" or "wrong" runs off the
       assumption that the thing that happened could have happened any
       other way than it did. Mind games, thoughts trying to run back
       to the past and project an alternate version of events that
       would lead to an alternate future... Fun to watch and toy with,
       totally useless unless a mental framework to be used in dealing
       with the future is updated because of the thought (aka
       "learning").  :D
       And, interesting point about controlling thoughts... All
       "decision" is either totally automatic or done in response to a
       thought... but if there's no controlling thoughts (and there
       isn't), then there's no controlling action either... Which tears
       apart "control" as a concept. Which weakens "self" as a concept.
       On and on it goes...
       Of course, my ego automatically senses the losing position and
       retreats to a more defensible place. "Well, *I* decide which
       thought to believe." Good god, it never lets up  ::)
       #Post#: 25810--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Jed Rant: On Right Action
   DIR By: mllem
       Date: December 5, 2016, 10:57 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Are you kidding? Many people say and do exactly that: This is
       100% wrong, and I'm going to do it anyways. Um, me, for example.
       #Post#: 25812--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Jed Rant: On Right Action
   DIR By: warnie
       Date: December 5, 2016, 2:41 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       dispite the idea of right and wrong. 100% wrong is 100%wrong. If
       someone still did it, there must have been something right about
       it even if it was .05% right.
       #Post#: 25813--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Jed Rant: On Right Action
   DIR By: Frits
       Date: December 5, 2016, 3:01 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: warnie link ---
       >
       > dispite the idea of right and wrong. 100% wrong is 100%wrong.
       If someone still did it, there must have been something right
       about it even if it was .05% right.
       --- End Quote ---
       Like Jed said... well, I think he said it, I haven't re-read it,
       but I think he said: it's 100% wrong AND 100% right, because, in
       Truth (if I may use that word vainly) there is no right and no
       wrong... just IS (everything else is just what your imaginary
       "I" believes it to be, judging its ass off until the cows come
       home or the fat lady sings... whatever comes first).
       #Post#: 25816--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Jed Rant: On Right Action
   DIR By: FractalJackal
       Date: December 5, 2016, 6:10 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: mllem link ---
       >
       > Are you kidding? Many people say and do exactly that: This is
       100% wrong, and I'm going to do it anyways. Um, me, for example.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Then you must not actually think it's "wrong." ;) You might be
       confusing societal definitions with personal ones. Lots of
       people don't give a flying fart about what society or others
       determine "wrong." But it could be argued that every individual
       person takes the choice that they think "best," even if that
       "best" is just for, by, and of themselves because of their
       belief in separation.
       By extension, one could argue that whole "best of all possible
       worlds" thing to be trueish.
       No one smokes a joint or shoots up a school thinking "this is so
       wrong" unless they're thinking from an imagined "other's" point
       of view. They do it because, on some level, they get some
       benefit from it (at least some perceived benefit). As far as I
       can tell, that's every human action in a nutshell.
       #Post#: 25820--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Jed Rant: On Right Action
   DIR By: Jed McKenna
       Date: December 5, 2016, 10:47 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Dear Posters:
       Thank you for your posts. You are all 100% correct and 100%
       out-to-lunch... which is what I am eating right now. A member
       mentioned ''rules'' so here is an ''Rules Set'' that one can
       observer in self and others quite readily when aware of them.
       My/My: My rules for me and my rules for you. This type of person
       is often quite quick to tell others what to do or what they
       expect of them.
       My: My rules for you and I don't give a crap what rules you use.
       No/My: I don't have any rules for me but I have some for you ...
       if you are will to listen.
       My/Your: My rules for me and your rules for you. This person
       tends to see both sides and thus is usually reticent to tell
       others what to do.
       Now... these are a natural part of the human function and
       experience. I suggest you take a moment and use them as a
       filter... on yourself first of all... and then on those closest
       too you. The rules fit into different domains... what one should
       do in a relationship, the old right/wrong argument, how one
       should behave in business, etc. This Rules Set can also be seen
       from a distance by observing certain body language... and I am
       pretty auditory so I can do it reasonably well over Skype.
       So, what rules set does Mr. Trump follow? What would a good
       communicator use... or a bad one? What rules do institutions
       follow... schools, governments, churches... how about your
       parents, girlfriend, boyfriend, your pet dog or cat. That last
       one is definitely my rules for me and screw you... but in
       certain contexts that can be quite effective.
       All humans have rules and they are not bad, however, being aware
       of them can be quite useful. It has nothing to do with T/R but
       quite a bit with H/A and broadening one's understanding of the
       human experience. Ramana had Rules, Nisargadatta has Rules and
       was quite vocal about them at times. Your Rules are pretty much
       as set habit, although those who are very response flexible will
       pick and choose depending upon a given context/relationship. I
       suggest you play with them and make some effort to find out
       other's Rules.
       Your feedback is always welcome.
       Love ya, Jed.
       #Post#: 25826--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Jed Rant: On Right Action
   DIR By: alighazi
       Date: December 6, 2016, 3:18 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I think there is another category. Your/Your: your rules for me
       and Your rules for you. many common.
       #Post#: 25829--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Jed Rant: On Right Action
   DIR By: Jed McKenna
       Date: December 6, 2016, 9:36 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Excellent point Alig... let's through them in too. So, which do
       you default to most frequently?
       Love ya, Jed.
       #Post#: 25841--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Jed Rant: On Right Action
   DIR By: know1
       Date: December 6, 2016, 5:57 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thats quite the Gordian knot you've spun there in that last post
       Jed, might take a few minds right to the brink...
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 3
   DIR Next Page