URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Jack's House
  HTML https://jackshouse.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Free Discussion
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 30836--------------------------------------------------
       Learn a lesson vs Need vs Punishment
       By: Zyngaru Date: April 23, 2025, 7:53 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Learn a lesson vs Need vs Punishment
       I have noticed when reading answers to BOTD that some people
       lean towards one of these reasons more than another for reasons
       to spank.
       I have read that the boy has already learned his lesson, so a
       spanking wouldn't do him any good.  Or.  The boy needs a
       spanking to clear his conscience.  Or.  This boy needs to be
       punished. He is getting a spanking.
       So, my question is it proper when boy steals not to spank him as
       punishment, just because he feels so guilty for stealing?
       When I read comments, it sounds like some have views where
       punishment spankings are not as important as a learning spanking
       or a need spanking.
       So, I am curious as to how you decide what is important when
       deciding when a boy needs to be spanked vs, when a boy gets
       spanked to learn a lesson, or when a boy is spanked as
       punishment.  Why do you drop some reasons for spanking over
       others?
       Look back at a few BOTD's and you will understand my confusion
       as to which reason if any hold prevalence over the others.
       Should a boy not be punished if he shows remorse, because he has
       already learned his lesson by how he feels?
       Just being curious.
       #Post#: 30839--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Learn a lesson vs Need vs Punishment
       By: Jack Date: April 23, 2025, 5:04 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       There's no right answer to this.  Each person will have their
       own belief, and for most of us, it will vary with the situation
       and even the boy involved.
       Spanking does not teach lessons.  To me, it stresses that bad
       actions have bad consequences.  I guess that means I come down
       more on the punishment side.  The thing is, I've caught boys
       shoplifting and they all swear that they learned their lesson.
       Now, if I just say 'okay, as long as you learned', what's the
       reason lesson they learned?  I think spankings make an
       impression on a boy, but they're not as harsh as a long term
       grounding, and certainly not as bad as adults face (divorce,
       being fired, prison...).
       I think that the 'need' is a separate issue more often than not.
       I have known boys and young men who need the catharsis of a
       spanking, sometimes from guilt, and sometimes just from anxiety
       and stress.
       #Post#: 30841--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Learn a lesson vs Need vs Punishment
       By: afinch Date: April 23, 2025, 5:52 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I agree with Jack that it depends on the boy.
       #Post#: 30847--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Learn a lesson vs Need vs Punishment
       By: David M. Katz Date: April 24, 2025, 8:48 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I agree with Kier who agrees with Jack.
       
       Each boy and circumstance has to be evaluated at the time.
       #Post#: 30848--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Learn a lesson vs Need vs Punishment
       By: Zyngaru Date: April 24, 2025, 9:18 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Jack link=topic=3463.msg30839#msg30839
       date=1745445896]
       There's no right answer to this.  Each person will have their
       own belief, and for most of us, it will vary with the situation
       and even the boy involved.
       Spanking does not teach lessons.  To me, it stresses that bad
       actions have bad consequences.  I guess that means I come down
       more on the punishment side.  The thing is, I've caught boys
       shoplifting and they all swear that they learned their lesson.
       Now, if I just say 'okay, as long as you learned', what's the
       reason lesson they learned?  I think spankings make an
       impression on a boy, but they're not as harsh as a long term
       grounding, and certainly not as bad as adults face (divorce,
       being fired, prison...).
       I think that the 'need' is a separate issue more often than not.
       I have known boys and young men who need the catharsis of a
       spanking, sometimes from guilt, and sometimes just from anxiety
       and stress.
       [/quote]
       Since it seems this is a Jack agreement topic, then I am
       assuming that is why on BOTD's there is an inconsistency as to
       when and why boys are spanked.  Each one is an individual.  So,
       this one boy may be spanked for stealing and this other one will
       be lectured instead, and yet another one will be comforted
       because he shows remorse.  So, a crime doesn't always mean
       punishment.  That does reflect current social norms.  Thanks for
       your comments.
       #Post#: 30849--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Learn a lesson vs Need vs Punishment
       By: afinch Date: April 24, 2025, 3:14 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Let me ask you a question via a hypothetical, Z.  Boy is
       forbidden from riding his bike for a week.  He takes it anyway,
       and falls off while riding, breaking his arm.  That was direct,
       dangerous, deliberate disobedience.  Will spanking him when he
       gets home from having his arm set and put in a cast serve any
       purpose?
       #Post#: 30853--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Learn a lesson vs Need vs Punishment
       By: Jack Date: April 24, 2025, 5:03 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Zyngaru link=topic=3463.msg30848#msg30848
       date=1745504307]
       That does reflect current social norms.
       [/quote]
       Not particularly.  Look at the story of the prodigal son.  One
       has to consider a lot of factors when making a decision.  As a
       matter of fact, it seems to me we see less of that these days,
       what with zero tolerance rules and similar.
       #Post#: 30856--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Learn a lesson vs Need vs Punishment
       By: Zyngaru Date: April 24, 2025, 5:15 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=afinch link=topic=3463.msg30849#msg30849
       date=1745525656]
       Let me ask you a question via a hypothetical, Z.  Boy is
       forbidden from riding his bike for a week.  He takes it anyway,
       and falls off while riding, breaking his arm.  That was direct,
       dangerous, deliberate disobedience.  Will spanking him when he
       gets home from having his arm set and put in a cast serve any
       purpose?
       [/quote]
       The answer to that question comes from a further hypothetical.
       If he hadn't broken his arm, would being spanked for direct
       disobedience serve any purpose?
       I personally believe that direct disobedience requires
       punishment.  It doesn't have to come in the form of a spanking,
       it could be grounding, restrictions, extra chores, and etc.  But
       to allow direct disobedience to prevail is undermining
       authority.
       In the original hypothetical of a broken arm as possibly being
       punishment enough.  The idea of reaping what you sow, or
       consequences of actions in the broken arm as penalty of
       disobedient actions doesn't hold water.  It is true that if he
       hadn't disobeyed, he probably wouldn't have gotten his arm
       broke, but it in no way is punishment for the original
       disobedience.
       A burglar robs your house, but on his way home he wrecks his
       car.  Should his theft be forgotten because he wrecked his car?
       Does wrecking his car do anything to change his thieving
       behavior?
       Does the boy breaking his arm do anything to change his
       disobedient behavior?  Or does it tell the boy he needs to learn
       how to ride his bike better?
       I know there is great pain in breaking a bone.  I have never
       broken anything, but I have been around kids who have.  The pain
       is horrible for the short term and then it is replaced by what
       could be considered hero worship as every kid and many adults
       want to sign the cast.  The broken arm becomes the subject of
       tales of bravery and honor over time.
       There are not many spankings for disobedience that become tales
       of bravery or honor.  Tales of warning maybe.  But not something
       a boy goes to school bragging about.
       I am stopping here because I started off into the weeds.
       Simple answer to your question.  The boy needs to be punished in
       some way that brings his disobedience into the forefront.  He
       needs to know disobedience is not allowed.  To allow his broken
       arm to erase his disobedience isn't teaching the boy anything,
       but that with the right circumstances he can get away with
       anything.
       I know this is the way of thinking from the 50's and 60's and
       not of the new millennia, but I am a child of the 50's.
       #Post#: 30857--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Learn a lesson vs Need vs Punishment
       By: Zyngaru Date: April 24, 2025, 5:30 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Jack link=topic=3463.msg30853#msg30853
       date=1745532190]
       [quote author=Zyngaru link=topic=3463.msg30848#msg30848
       date=1745504307]
       That does reflect current social norms.
       [/quote]
       Not particularly.  Look at the story of the prodigal son.  One
       has to consider a lot of factors when making a decision.  As a
       matter of fact, it seems to me we see less of that these days,
       what with zero tolerance rules and similar.
       [/quote]
       Unless I am misunderstanding the parable of the Prodigal son, he
       was well within his rights to take his inheritance and leave.
       He did not break any rules.  When he returned, he did not beg to
       be reinstated into the family.  No, he took responsibility for
       his failure and begged to be allowed to return as a servant, a
       slave.  The father chose to show mercy.  He rejoiced at the
       return of his son.  What the father did not do, was replace his
       son's inheritance.
       I do not believe in zero tolerance.  There is a difference
       between zero tolerance and accepting responsibility for your
       actions.  It is not one or the other.  There is grey in our
       lives.  Mercy, grace and forgiveness are all in play or should
       be with everyone.  At the same time there needs to be punishment
       for wrongdoing.  The same person who gave us the parable of the
       Prodigal son also gave us the parable of reaping and sowing.
       *****************************************************