DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
Ignis Ardens
HTML https://ignisardens.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Social and Moral Doctrine
*****************************************************
#Post#: 11--------------------------------------------------
Faith & Freedom of Expression
DIR By: Pearlh
Date: January 16, 2015, 1:31 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
It is of course a myth that we have anything resembling free
speech.
The list of things that cannot be discussed publicly goes on and
on.
In the seventies there was a huge controversy about IQ
differences between the races. A number of prominent scientists
including Eyesenck and Watson (one of the DNA guys) produced
substantial evidence that the were such differences. They have
effectively become non persons and it is absolutely forbidden to
discuss the subject. In our own times, the Holocaust is perhaps
the most egregious example. But it is worth bearing in mind the
huge confusion between belief so called fact. So you could be
branded a criminal in Europe for not believing in the Holocaust,
though belief is defined as acceptance or an opinion of
something without proof. If I deny the battle of Hastings, I
might be called perverse, but nothing really follows from that,
other than that people might think I'm an oddball. But the
position with regard to the Holocaust is far worse because of
the fusion and confusion between belief and 'fact'.
The only thing western society seems committed to is what in
traditional terms might be called obscenity or pornography, you
could also say that this French magazine Charlie Hebdo, was not
defending free speech , because there is no free speech in it,
or anything rational, only a sub-literate pornography and
obscenities.
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 1