DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
Haxball Club Divisionals
HTML https://hcd.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: General Discussion
*****************************************************
#Post#: 7797--------------------------------------------------
official power rankings (week 1)
DIR By: sportace
Date: May 22, 2013, 10:31 am
---------------------------------------------------------
majors:
1. wallabies - had 7 show up, won 8-3 (shrug)
2. weathermen - won cup last ssn, nothin rly changed. over
roster limit tho
3. pengs - sona said she isnt gonna show up much so ur dunzo
4. willynillys - n0 gk, best players will only show in ploofs
(implying u make it). also ur over roster limit
5. recession - wrekd
6. ss - >stone
miners:
1. nighthawks - bl0ck opicon para mtgay
2. c0les team
3. sk1llds team
4. lofs team
5. buxxxx's team
6. >nyhc
#Post#: 7808--------------------------------------------------
Re: official power rankings (week 1)
DIR By: [-Dan-]
Date: May 22, 2013, 3:27 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
>
#Post#: 7812--------------------------------------------------
Re: official power rankings (week 1)
DIR By: stone55
Date: May 22, 2013, 4:05 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
>
#Post#: 7820--------------------------------------------------
Re: official power rankings (week 1)
DIR By: anon
Date: May 22, 2013, 4:57 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
This is how a conversation with stone would pan out after a week
of losses.
"anon: So stone55, why are the results not producing?
stone: We will fix that, we have undr and rfrank.
anon: That may be so, but have you noticed that the team with
such a high potential is in such a terrible position despite
those two lads?
stone: Doesn't matter, we have undr and rfrank.
anon: Have you not noticed that as of late both have low
availability?
stone: When undr and rfrank show, we get the necessary points.
anon: What if you don't make those 'necessary points' and miss
the playoffs?
stone: undr and rfrank will show just enough and then playoffs
and ez cup.
anon: Very well. How about the rest of your team? Your team has
a significant lack of depth in it, nowhere near enough to
replace your two stars.
stone: With undr and rfrank we don't need depth.
anon: Well they have not played a single game together, either
one, the other, or neither. Does that not trouble you?
stone: Who cares, when undr and rfrank show its an auto win,
we're doing it to make cup look hard.
anon: How interesting. Wonderful chat. Good luck with the rest
of the campaign, stone55.
srone: We don't need luck, we just need undr and rfrank."
#Post#: 7824--------------------------------------------------
Re: official power rankings (week 1)
DIR By: sportace
Date: May 22, 2013, 5:10 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML http://i.imgur.com/zlatLJB.jpg
#Post#: 7825--------------------------------------------------
Re: official power rankings (week 1)
DIR By: Canni
Date: May 22, 2013, 5:27 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
hus Rfrank and undr
#Post#: 7831--------------------------------------------------
Re: official power rankings (week 1)
DIR By: Cole72
Date: May 22, 2013, 10:30 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: anon link ---
>
> This is how a conversation with stone would pan out after a
week of losses.
>
> "anon: So stone55, why are the results not producing?
> stone: We will fix that, we have undr and rfrank.
> anon: That may be so, but have you noticed that the team with
such a high potential is in such a terrible position despite
those two lads?
> stone: Doesn't matter, we have undr and rfrank.
> anon: Have you not noticed that as of late both have low
availability?
> stone: When undr and rfrank show, we get the necessary points.
> anon: What if you don't make those 'necessary points' and miss
the playoffs?
> stone: undr and rfrank will show just enough and then playoffs
and ez cup.
> anon: Very well. How about the rest of your team? Your team
has a significant lack of depth in it, nowhere near enough to
replace your two stars.
> stone: With undr and rfrank we don't need depth.
> anon: Well they have not played a single game together, either
one, the other, or neither. Does that not trouble you?
> stone: Who cares, when undr and rfrank show its an auto win,
we're doing it to make cup look hard.
> anon: How interesting. Wonderful chat. Good luck with the rest
of the campaign, stone55.
> srone: We don't need luck, we just need undr and rfrank."
>
--- End Quote ---
p much lol
#Post#: 7840--------------------------------------------------
Re: official power rankings (week 1)
DIR By: blockade
Date: May 23, 2013, 3:05 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
omfg lold so hard
#Post#: 7842--------------------------------------------------
Re: official power rankings (week 1)
DIR By: sportace
Date: May 23, 2013, 6:06 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML http://i.imgur.com/zlatLJB.jpg
HTML http://i.imgur.com/XEIfA89.jpg
LOL
#Post#: 7850--------------------------------------------------
Re: official power rankings (week 1)
DIR By: BubbleGum
Date: May 24, 2013, 5:01 am
---------------------------------------------------------
im undr and rfronk
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 2
DIR Next Page