URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hax Community
  HTML https://haxnuts.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Interesting stuff
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 291105--------------------------------------------------
       Re: News Article
   DIR By: kkt
       Date: December 13, 2024, 11:41 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       But this doctor WAS part of a hospital.
       #Post#: 291172--------------------------------------------------
       Re: News Article
   DIR By: farmgirl
       Date: December 13, 2024, 1:29 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: kkt link ---
       >
       > But this doctor WAS part of a hospital.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Yes, he was.  I read the article.  But clearly the hospital
       wasn't his "boss" and didn't seem to have oversight over what he
       did and how he did it.  It might have been because the hospital
       profited from the way this guy operated, I'm not sure.
       But I am certain that if a doctor in the health group that my
       primary care doctor is part of did this kind of thing, it would
       not have been able to occur to this extent or for this length of
       time.  I remember, years ago, when one of the very best doctors
       in that family practice group left to take an oversight position
       for the network that my physicians group was part of.  When
       there are multiple doctors within a practice, there are
       standards and records available to the other physicians.  When
       my primary is not available, the records she has made ARE
       available.
       This is my point - that a doctor should not be a "lone ranger"
       even if practicing in or being employed by a hospital, because
       the hospital is not overseeing the physician or the physician's
       records in the way that a physician's group practice or network
       would be doing.
       It certainly seemed like this physician did not share his
       records with other physicians or have other physicians covering
       for him when he was away.  I think that is a red flag in itself.
       
       #Post#: 291175--------------------------------------------------
       Re: News Article
   DIR By: acl-ny
       Date: December 13, 2024, 1:37 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The hospital should have been his boss, but every time there was
       a question - and there were times - the hospital cowed. He
       threatened to sue and they said 'ok, never mind.' And yes, they
       benefitted financially.
       #Post#: 291220--------------------------------------------------
       Re: News Article
   DIR By: MidwestmikkiJ
       Date: December 13, 2024, 4:51 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: farmgirl link ---
       >
       > [quote author=kkt link=topic=3228.msg291087#msg291087
       date=1734109630]
       > So many red flags.  Becoming the primary care doctor in
       addition to his specialty.  Billing for seeing more patients
       than physically possible.  Handwritten prescriptions to bypass
       automatic warnings.  Just the sheer number of deaths.
       >
       > Everybody is supposed to have a boss, and his boss wasn't
       doing their job.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I'm going to disagree with this.  There are many people,
       particularly in professional services, who are sole
       practitioners or who otherwise ARE the boss and who do not have
       a boss.
       A doctor or lawyer (or politician) often doesn't have a boss,
       unless they are part of a practice.  The professional licensing
       organization can be the only one who has any oversight - and
       that's generally only when serious professional violations have
       occurred AND have been brought to the organization's attention.
       And then the oversight is pretty darn weak.
       This is honestly why I said doctors should not be "lone rangers"
       - at least in my opinion.  I think it's better if they are part
       of a practice.
       [/quote]
       Hospitals have a Chief Medical Officer not exactly a boss but
       someone who is supposed to keep an eye on outliers.
       The in house review group obviously didn't do their job.
       There were layers upon layers of failure in this story.
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 2
   DIR Previous Page