DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
GRP1
HTML https://grp1.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: P-1 Topics
*****************************************************
#Post#: 578--------------------------------------------------
SOUND LAB
DIR By: sky
Date: March 28, 2018, 4:32 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Hello can you put the sound lab requirements on here please?
#Post#: 579--------------------------------------------------
Re: SOUND LAB
DIR By: Tom Cruise
Date: March 28, 2018, 6:06 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I can't get it to post for some reason, but I'll put it on
Google Classroom-
#Post#: 580--------------------------------------------------
Re: SOUND LAB
DIR By: sky
Date: March 28, 2018, 7:55 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Thank you, just a clarifying question it says to not measure the
water because the air is what’s resonating, so when it says on
the data table the length of he tube when resonance occurs
doesn’t it mean the length the water is at on the tube when we
hear resonance?
#Post#: 581--------------------------------------------------
Re: SOUND LAB
DIR By: Tom Cruise
Date: March 28, 2018, 8:03 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: sky link ---
>
> Thank you, just a clarifying question it says to not measure
the water because the air is what’s resonating, so when it says
on the data table the length of he tube when resonance occurs
doesn’t it mean the length the water is at on the tube when we
hear resonance?
>
--- End Quote ---
No, it means the length of the tube that is hollow. The air
inside the tube above the waterline is what is resonating, so
the length of the tube that does not have water in it is what
you need.
#Post#: 582--------------------------------------------------
Re: SOUND LAB
DIR By: Bronco
Date: March 28, 2018, 9:43 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
So I am a tad bit confused. For our calculations, are we
supposed to find the calculated frequency of the turning fork
and comparing it to the amount listed on the fork itself, or are
we supposed to solve for the speed of sound using the known
value of the fork and the wavelength?
#Post#: 583--------------------------------------------------
Re: SOUND LAB
DIR By: Tom Cruise
Date: March 28, 2018, 10:39 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Bronco link ---
>
> So I am a tad bit confused. For our calculations, are we
supposed to find the calculated frequency of the turning fork
and comparing it to the amount listed on the fork itself, or are
we supposed to solve for the speed of sound using the known
value of the fork and the wavelength?
>
--- End Quote ---
You are supposed to solve for the speed of sound experimentally,
and compare it to the known value based on the room's
temperature
#Post#: 584--------------------------------------------------
Re: SOUND LAB
DIR By: Titan
Date: March 28, 2018, 11:17 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
In the Data Analysis, are we supposed to calculate the point of
the second harmonic then put that in our conclusion relative to
the hypothesis?
#Post#: 585--------------------------------------------------
Re: SOUND LAB
DIR By: Tom Cruise
Date: March 29, 2018, 12:08 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Titan link ---
>
> In the Data Analysis, are we supposed to calculate the point
of the second harmonic then put that in our conclusion relative
to the hypothesis?
>
--- End Quote ---
You don't have to calculate anything for that part, just need to
do the experiment and compare the result to your hypothesis
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 1