DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Golden Sun
  HTML https://goldensun.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: General Discussion
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 2--------------------------------------------------
       Historically in search there has been
       By: Shovo Ray Date: August 29, 2023, 4:47 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The view that you are responsible for what you have done but not
       the actions of others. The alternate roadmap would lead to this
       sort of insanity Our system has noticed that in the last week
       you received spam emails. In result your email account was
       temporarily suspended. Please contact the spammers and once you
       have a proof they unsuscribed you from their spam databases we
       will reconsider reopening your email account.
       As Google has closed down their own ecosystem they allow their
       own editorial to rank front center even if it is pure spam but
       third parties are now held to a higher standard you could be
       held liable for the actions Phone Number Data
  HTML https://dbtodata.com/phone-number-data/
       of others. At the
       extreme one of Googles selfpromotional automated email spam
       messages sent a guy to jail. In spite of such issues Google
       remains unfazed adding a setting which allows anyone on Google
       to email other members. Ask Google if they should be held liable
       for the actions of third parties and they will tell you to go to
       hell. Their approach.
  HTML http://zh-cn.canadapeople.clu
       b/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/image_2023_08_29T07_20_58_965Z-300x
       182.png
  HTML https://dbtodata.com/phone-number-data/
       To copyright remains fuzzy they keep hosting more third party
       content on their own sites and even when that content has been
       deemed illegal they scream that it undermines their first
       amendment rights if they are made to proactively filter Finally
       they claimed they were defending free speech. But its the courts
       which said the pictures were illegal and should not be shown so
       the issue is the rule of law not freedom of speech. ... the
       nontechnical.
       *****************************************************