gopher.createaforum.com/1/forums/globalcollapse/p/70/5

DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
Global Collapse
HTML https://globalcollapse.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: General Discussion
*****************************************************
#Post#: 2394--------------------------------------------------
The Gestapo has arrived
By: RE Date: January 12, 2022, 5:09 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Is this still the "Legal Phase" of Fascism?
HTML https://www.npr.org/2022/01/11/1072123333/justice-department-domestic-terrorism-unit
The Justice Department will create a domestic terrorism unit to
counter rising threats
RE
#Post#: 2421--------------------------------------------------
Re: Key Kazakh oilfield hit by protests
By: Phil Potts Date: January 14, 2022, 12:31 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=BuddyJ link=topic=70.msg2399#msg2399
date=1642030528]
[quote author=Phil Potts link=topic=70.msg2387#msg2387
date=1641929400]
Let me recap the context you forget. You dreamed up discussions
about oil fields and protests of them signifying... well,
something?reinforcing the idea we are fools.
[/quote]
Well, certainly on the topic of oilfields. Unless you want to
disprove the supposition by discussing any one of the three
largest oil accumulations on the planet and the accompanying
costs, sizes, ongoing development (or not), reserve and resource
sizes, geopolitical issues and effect of all these factors on
future development? ;D
[quote author="Phil Potts"]
The only discussion of oil fields was on sustainability and
EROEI, not protesting them.
[/quote]
Well, perhaps if folks didn't use the word "protesting" and
"oilfields" in the same title sentence, I might believe you? The
idea of a sustainable oilfield is about as amusing as any
alleged expert daring to know that in the history of the oil and
gas industry not once has an EROEI metric been relevant to the
decision making process to proceed, or not. But without a
corresponding oil expert claiming to know pertinent details on
the most important oil accumulations on the planet, that isn't a
surprise is it?
[quote author="Phil Potts"]
You said then it is obvious oil fields are not sustainable, but
I might think they are.
[/quote]
Please elaborate. Unless of course you want to play a semantic
game related to the timing of oil generation as proof that human
time scales aren't relevant to the definition of "sustainable"?
In either case, I'm happy to discuss topics that folks seem to
think I know something about.
[quote author="phil potts"]
The only person to suggest anything like that is yourself in
saying we have 200 yrs of oil left. If you want to excuse
yourself from it now, it explains deleting your own comments
soon after making them.
[/quote]
I have explained the possibilities under which I would claim
that 200 years was a relevant timeframe. Read them again as I
haven't removed the post. Pretend I was telling the true
because...you know...I was. Feel free to use your oil expertise
to decimate whatever oil argument you believe I made. All you
seem to recall is someone, maybe me, maybe not, claimed there is
200 years of oil left. With neither of us remembering the exact
context, or in my place, that I even said such a thing.
[/quote]
You must agree I would be the fool if I believed other people
are idiots if they know less than me about neurodegeneration>the
substantia nigra>prion diseases>protein folding>kreutzfeldt
Jacobs disease>definite death. Just in case you might know
someone dying or dead from it and learned it's aetiology, I can
shift to things the clinic can't tell you. What anomaly you
would expect to find on the brain in autopsy of this guy below?
Supposing you fluked it he would have a bulge on the right motor
cortex associated with left hand, you could tell me whether if
he spent another 50 yrs learning more and more notes, chords and
melodies that gyrus would become a sulci, or extra connectivity
across the cortex with a thicker corpus callosum or both. What a
waste of my time typing all that and everyone else's reading it.
Now I do feel foolish, throwing around jargon to confuse rather
than inform readers.
If we do not make any claims on oil related matters, our
accuracy on them is 100% correct. All that remains then is the
question of why you are so insistent we are idiots. Not only why
you made up that we had discussions of protests at oilfields to
throw in we know nothing about oilfields, but why you
effectively turn up to BLM in a KKK cloak and then tell us we
are unfit to be in your presence.
You needed to read the article to understand protests and
oilfield in the headline didn't mean protests of oilfields.
EROEI seems to determine which oil is accessed earliest and
last. As for that headline triggering false memories, I doubt
you could successfully sue.
There's nothing to elaborate or discuss on what you said in that
we are correct oilfields are not sustainable. If now it needs
further qualifiers, that's for you to provide, it's not for me
to explain your statement. Better you clarify you're not talking
about abiotic oil with it possibly being generated in human
timeframes, equivalent to having been inside area 51.
There's no question it was you who gave the answer of 200 years
and I've given you the exact context. You painted yourself into
a corner of needing to provide a more substantial answer to the
question of how many years we do have if you are saying someone
else is wrong and the reason why is only they are often right
for the wrong reasons.
If you were not "telling the true", it also explains why you
were deleting
all your comments.
It's a non issue anyway. There's really no need to go into the
only discussion of oil fields being on their not being
sustainable and flow on effects. Just stick to discussion of oil
fields and protests of them proving we are idiots, and whether
you were telling the true again. Now I don't know whether
Ghanwar, The Permian Basin and Eagle Ford are really real.
HTML https://youtu.be/xuj2-56NlB0
#Post#: 2426--------------------------------------------------
Ukraine: Who will Pull the Trigger?
By: RE Date: January 14, 2022, 5:17 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"Diplomacy" so far has failed to resolve the problem. Who will
blink first in this game of Chicken?
Will NATO try to sneak some missiles into Ukraine? Will Vlad
the Impaler roll the Tanks? Who will blame who for the ensuing
melee? Will it escalate and how? What economic sanctions will
be invoked by either side? Will a covert Cyber war be
undertaken as each side tries to out-hack the other?
I doubt Vlad will back down. He drew a line in Ukaine Sand, and
if he perceives it's being crossed, he will roll the tanks.
Opinions welcome on how this will play out.
HTML https://www.politico.com/news/2022/01/13/moscow-washington-ukraine-527090
As talks flame out, Moscow and Washington brace for next moves
on Ukraine
RE
#Post#: 2430--------------------------------------------------
Ukraine Cyber &amp; False Flag War Underway
By: RE Date: January 14, 2022, 11:26 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Who is doing What to Whom? ???
HTML https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/14/europe/ukraine-cyber-attack-government-intl/index.html
Cyberattack hits Ukraine government websites
RE
#Post#: 2434--------------------------------------------------
Re: Ukraine: Who will Pull the Trigger?
By: Phil Potts Date: January 14, 2022, 11:03 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=RE link=topic=70.msg2426#msg2426 date=1642159064]
Opinions welcome on how this will play out.
[/quote]
If we can keep it on the downlow, JHK has some thoughts I'll
slip in while KD is indisposed:
HTML https://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/dog-gone/
#Post#: 2435--------------------------------------------------
Re: Ukraine: Who will Pull the Trigger?
By: RE Date: January 15, 2022, 12:59 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=Phil Potts link=topic=70.msg2434#msg2434
date=1642222989]
[quote author=RE link=topic=70.msg2426#msg2426 date=1642159064]
Opinions welcome on how this will play out.
[/quote]
If we can keep it on the downlow, JHK has some thoughts I'll
slip in while KD is indisposed:
HTML https://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/dog-gone/
[/quote]
JHK said a lot of nothing. His thesis seems to be the FSoA and
NATO should do nothing. But then how do the Eurotrash get
Ruskie NG? After all these years in the Collapse Biz, at least
a passing reference to the Energy transfer biz and pipelines
should seem to be in order. He says nothing at all about it.
This isn't really about FSoA v Mother Russia, it's about NATO &
the EU v MR. Ukraine sits smack dab in between. We won't be
sending Kansas Grunts to fight (if we actually have any), the
Krauts will have to send their grunts. And the Frogs too. Then
they can exchange Cruise Missiles and blow the rotting
infrastructure to hell.
All in all, I found JHKs analysis too be quite shallow.
RE
#Post#: 2436--------------------------------------------------
Re: Ukraine: Who will Pull the Trigger?
By: Phil Potts Date: January 15, 2022, 1:23 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=RE link=topic=70.msg2435#msg2435 date=1642229974]
[quote author=Phil Potts link=topic=70.msg2434#msg2434
date=1642222989]
[quote author=RE link=topic=70.msg2426#msg2426 date=1642159064]
Opinions welcome on how this will play out.
[/quote]
If we can keep it on the downlow, JHK has some thoughts I'll
slip in while KD is indisposed:
HTML https://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/dog-gone/
[/quote]
JHK said a lot of nothing. His thesis seems to be the FSoA and
NATO should do nothing. But then how do the Eurotrash get
Ruskie NG? After all these years in the Collapse Biz, at least
a passing reference to the Energy transfer biz and pipelines
should seem to be in order. He says nothing at all about it.
This isn't really about FSoA v Mother Russia, it's about NATO &
the EU v MR. Ukraine sits smack dab in between. We won't be
sending Kansas Grunts to fight (if we actually have any), the
Krauts will have to send their grunts. And the Frogs too. Then
they can exchange Cruise Missiles and blow the rotting
infrastructure to hell.
All in all, I found JHKs analysis too be quite shallow.
RE
[/quote]
The euros get rus gas by not massing more troops and nukes on
Russia's border. By not pretending Russia is an enemy and a
threat just to keep companies like Boeing and Raytheon busy. By
not going along with the US trying to maintain unipolar hegemony
with trying to get a first strike advantage.
#Post#: 2439--------------------------------------------------
Re: Ukraine: Who will Pull the Trigger?
By: RE Date: January 15, 2022, 4:48 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=Phil Potts link=topic=70.msg2436#msg2436
date=1642231385]
[quote author=RE link=topic=70.msg2435#msg2435 date=1642229974]
[quote author=Phil Potts link=topic=70.msg2434#msg2434
date=1642222989]
[quote author=RE link=topic=70.msg2426#msg2426 date=1642159064]
Opinions welcome on how this will play out.
[/quote]
If we can keep it on the downlow, JHK has some thoughts I'll
slip in while KD is indisposed:
HTML https://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/dog-gone/
[/quote]
JHK said a lot of nothing. His thesis seems to be the FSoA and
NATO should do nothing. But then how do the Eurotrash get
Ruskie NG? After all these years in the Collapse Biz, at least
a passing reference to the Energy transfer biz and pipelines
should seem to be in order. He says nothing at all about it.
This isn't really about FSoA v Mother Russia, it's about NATO &
the EU v MR. Ukraine sits smack dab in between. We won't be
sending Kansas Grunts to fight (if we actually have any), the
Krauts will have to send their grunts. And the Frogs too. Then
they can exchange Cruise Missiles and blow the rotting
infrastructure to hell.
All in all, I found JHKs analysis too be quite shallow.
RE
[/quote]
The euros get rus gas by not massing more troops and nukes on
Russia's border. By not pretending Russia is an enemy and a
threat just to keep companies like Boeing and Raytheon busy. By
not going along with the US trying to maintain unipolar hegemony
with trying to get a first strike advantage.
[/quote]
That might be true,, but if Brussels aligns with Moscow instead
of Washington, the whole NATO group falls apart. I doubt the
Germans would ever align with the Russians. Besides that there
is the REAL power, the World Bank and the IMF that is calling
the shots here. Unless and until they change the Reserve
Currency from the Dollar to the Rouble, the FSoA Military is
their Muscle. Remember, all wars are Banker Wars.
RE
#Post#: 2456--------------------------------------------------
With U.S. and Russia Stalemate at Ukraine Talks, Moment of Truth
Nears
By: RE Date: January 16, 2022, 3:41 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Houston, we've got a problem.
HTML https://www.newsweek.com/us-russia-odds-ukraine-talks-moment-truth-near-1669723
With U.S. and Russia Stalemate at Ukraine Talks, Moment of Truth
Nears
RE
#Post#: 2495--------------------------------------------------
For Putin, Kazakhstan is a domino too big to fall
By: RE Date: January 18, 2022, 3:59 am
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/17/opinions/putin-kazakhstan-russia-unrest-bociurkiw/index.html
For Putin, Kazakhstan is a domino too big to fall
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page