DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
Global Collapse
HTML https://globalcollapse.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: General Discussion
*****************************************************
#Post#: 314--------------------------------------------------
GC members in the Spotlight.
By: K-Dog Date: May 15, 2021, 11:27 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://youtu.be/A4CGxqo6T6U
Next week I will be on Green Screen :D
HTML https://chasingthesquirrel.com/public/pics/me051521.png
That frame is 1:31 in: I'm labeled 'Enviro-Activist'
Which is good work, go get it.
#Post#: 381--------------------------------------------------
Re: GC members in the Spotlight.
By: K-Dog Date: May 22, 2021, 3:05 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://youtu.be/mC5MF_1gSug
Things got a bit heated and I was PLAGUED by technical
difficulties.
#Post#: 383--------------------------------------------------
Re: GC members in the Spotlight.
By: Phil Potts Date: May 22, 2021, 7:16 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
No wonder it got heated. From the first 20 minutes sounded like
u called someone dickbrain and said Adam and Eve live in San
Francisco, then exited leaving them with a screen capture to
debate it with. But really, from what was audible after that, I
agree with your position. They seem like fools or tools. The guy
on the far right not only on this issue either
#Post#: 489--------------------------------------------------
Re: GC members in the Spotlight.
By: K-Dog Date: June 14, 2021, 9:58 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I went over to see what UGO was up to. He republished an old
article that had been very successful. I went to the old
article and found: [quote]Reverse Engineer September 14, 2013 at
2:47 PM
I think when talking about Cycles vs One-Shots, people tend to
try to make the facts fit what they believe, rather than make
what they believe fit the facts.
In the case of the Earth and multiple cycles, a philosophy
developed that because there have been multiple cycles before
this, there will be multiple cycles afterwards also. A Historian
like JMG looks at historical cycles of Civilizations, and then
projects there will be many more similar cycles.
This doesn't take into account the increasing complexity of the
cycles, the increased use of Energy through the cycles and the
changing Energy output of the Sun as time goes by here.
The geological conditions which got us to where we are today are
unlikely to repeat. Beyond that, in the 500M years or so of
multicellular life on the planet, only one Sentient species ever
evolved. So it is a pretty big stretch to imagine that 2 more
will evolve after this in maybe 200M more years where such life
is even possible at all on the planet.
This doesn't mean there are not Universal Cycles of recreation,
there may well be but not here on Earth in the time left, at
least it is highly unlikely.
About the only thing you can say for sure is that regardless of
whether we burned all that oil, we would eventually go extinct
anyhow. We may have accelerated the process some here, as I said
over on George's blog, its like Smoking for a person. Quitting
might help you live a little longer, but you still would end up
dead in the end. The only CHANCE was to get off the Earth in
some sort of Interstellar Starship, and we shot the wad trying
to come up with Energy Technology that would make such a thing
possible. That Holy Grail was Fusion Power. We never got it, and
as things spin down here, it is unlikely we ever will now.
So now it is not a matter of IF we will go extinct, just WHEN.
RE
HTML http://doomsteaddiner.net
I think when talking about Cycles vs
One-Shots, people tend to try to make the facts fit what they
believe, rather than make what they believe fit the facts.
In the case of the Earth and multiple cycles, a philosophy
developed that because there have been multiple cycles before
this, there will be multiple cycles afterwards also. A Historian
like JMG looks at historical cycles of Civilizations, and then
projects there will be many more similar cycles.
This doesn't take into account the increasing complexity of the
cycles, the increased use of Energy through the cycles and the
changing Energy output of the Sun as time goes by here.
The geological conditions which got us to where we are today are
unlikely to repeat. Beyond that, in the 500M years or so of
multicellular life on the planet, only one Sentient species ever
evolved. So it is a pretty big stretch to imagine that 2 more
will evolve after this in maybe 200M more years where such life
is even possible at all on the planet.
This doesn't mean there are not Universal Cycles of recreation,
there may well be but not here on Earth in the time left, at
least it is highly unlikely.
About the only thing you can say for sure is that regardless of
whether we burned all that oil, we would eventually go extinct
anyhow. We may have accelerated the process some here, as I said
over on George's blog, its like Smoking for a person. Quitting
might help you live a little longer, but you still would end up
dead in the end. The only CHANCE was to get off the Earth in
some sort of Interstellar Starship, and we shot the wad trying
to come up with Energy Technology that would make such a thing
possible. That Holy Grail was Fusion Power. We never got it, and
as things spin down here, it is unlikely we ever will now.
So now it is not a matter of IF we will go extinct, just WHEN.
RE
HTML http://doomsteaddiner.net
[/quote]
#Post#: 490--------------------------------------------------
Re: GC members in the Spotlight.
By: K-Dog Date: June 14, 2021, 10:27 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=Phil Potts link=topic=23.msg383#msg383
date=1621728990]
No wonder it got heated. From the first 20 minutes sounded like
u called someone dickbrain and said Adam and Eve live in San
Francisco, then exited leaving them with a screen capture to
debate it with. But really, from what was audible after that, I
agree with your position. They seem like fools or tools. The guy
on the far right not only on this issue either
[/quote]
Thanks for watching, the technical issues are fixed. This
Saturday I am talking about Carbon Dividends.
As to dickbrains:
HTML https://youtu.be/x6hzcanfihg
#Post#: 500--------------------------------------------------
Re: GC members in the Spotlight.
By: K-Dog Date: June 19, 2021, 11:28 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://youtu.be/wTIl5NzAwXQ
Marcus starts with the Anna Kasperian / Jimmy Dore controversy.
Jump ahead to 51:12 for Carbon Dividends.
And leave a comment if you can.
#Post#: 501--------------------------------------------------
Re: GC members in the Spotlight.
By: Phil Potts Date: June 20, 2021, 5:22 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
So is Cenk Ugur not a serious leftist because when one Democrat
candidate dropped out of primary race and put his support behind
the successful one, Cenk supported the party candidate as
well...or did he support Hillary over Bernie from the beginning?
I can't be the only one to see the irony of saying he's not a
serious news source while the whole time displaying his favoured
news person, Kasparian flipping the bird behind him.
The 15 yr old clip where Britney Spears did a gash flash getting
out of a limo. That was when her music was over and she got a
few more minutes of fame, there were a few others who did it as
well. Cenk said he doesn't care about the flashing but
criticised her weight. Everyone in the media was criticizing her
weight then with some comeback performance at Grammys or Oscars
(forgetting she was no longer a teenager and had 2 children),
South Park even did an episode on it. Cenk is a clown for sure
but he wasn't alone in sending Britney Spears insane.
I don't always know what Marcus is talking about, or that
everyone would agree he is right. It would help to introduce the
topic. I had to look up Jimmy Dore and where he says Kasparian
is blackmailing him. It is not as he thought, bringing up what
he said about showing him and the audience her ass being wrong,
rather than her doing it being wrong, but a message threatening
to me too him for other things in private.
He says his apology was a card he sent at the time, him now
telling what it's all about looked awkward, expectedly, but
isn't meant to be another apology.
Marcus mentions Assange, Russiagate and a number of other issues
with TYT being wrong, but does not say what their position was
so I don't know where they stood on any of those. I have no idea
if Marcus is a true progressive and thinks Russia hacked the
2016 election or whether he is right wing and soft on russia,
another Putin stooge as the saying goes. He agreed with the take
that any defence of Dore does make you right wing with the clip
under the heading "so I'm right wing now?"
It seems now you can't be a progressive and believe if you have
Monica Lewdinsky in the oval orifice, Hillary Clinton could have
concern or complain. Try putting this to the test and hiring an
18 year old assistant or maid who wears skimpy clothing and see
if the other women in the office or house still think not making
her uncomfortable is paramount.
I remember one time way back in 2000 when a Barbie doll like
creature came and gave a presentation on something I forget now.
In the lunch room all the women couldn't shut up about her. I
got so fed up I said 'come on give her a break, you all could
probably stop traffic too in your day'. They all erupted
laughing, but their instinctive initial reaction probably comes
from being threatened by her like Sarah was by Hagar in the Old
Testament. All that in group preference of the sisterhood
covering for each other, which I've seen plenty of too (this
same group were all gushing over wedding arrangements for one of
them while she was having an affair with one of the married guys
in our department, and they all knew). All that evaporates when
a new nubile might bear another heir, like Ishmael that
threatened to subtract from Isaacs inheritance. The claws come
out and they're sent into the desert.
At 36.30 you have your own incident like Jimmy Dore and the said
Steph. Kasparian is only a white woman that Dore embarrassed and
someone called Steph laughed at. Marcus saying that companies
advertising LGBTQ is bullshit and you laughing is a more serious
crime than theirs in intersectionality. If chenk or dore said
that today, not ten and fifteen years ago before gender
dysphoria became ideal and nudity became modesty, they would be
traded to fox news tomorrow.
HTML https://youtu.be/m-1saSNLveE
#Post#: 502--------------------------------------------------
Re: GC members in the Spotlight.
By: Phil Potts Date: June 20, 2021, 8:16 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
The damsel in distress
HTML https://youtu.be/m3DTBTUFgsE
#Post#: 503--------------------------------------------------
Re: GC members in the Spotlight.
By: K-Dog Date: June 21, 2021, 1:16 am
---------------------------------------------------------
For a damsel in distress, she can work it. This is the kind of
woman who believes nasty rumors. They feed on drama. Best
avoided. But then again, the hot blood could be stimulating.
She would wear a short skirt just to catch you looking so she
could call you a pig. That works for some people.
[img]
HTML https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.tenor.com%2Fimages%2F10d0a10d62145a703fcf9ab145deeac2%2Ftenor.gif&f=1&nofb=1[/img]
*****************************************************