URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Global Collapse
  HTML https://globalcollapse.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: General Discussion
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 248--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Climate Doom
       By: Phil Potts Date: May 8, 2021, 10:26 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.iceagefarmer.com/2021/05/08/brace-for-impact-about-to-get-much-worse/
       #Post#: 251--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Climate Doom
       By: John of Wallan Date: May 9, 2021, 9:27 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       This guys lays out a good timeline for whats coming and why.
       Few seem to realise that no food means no humans... Most think
       7/11 will be open and fully stocked for our convenience; its
       always been that way!
       I dont agree 100% with his conspiracy theories about ánything
       being planned...
       We are going into chaotic times with no one in power doing much
       planning other than trying to get past next election cycle.
       Despite all the propaganda about if we change our ways we can
       save the planet, and continue on with our current lifestyles,
       its looking more and more like too little too late.
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-U45PMTOicM
       Do what you can on a local level.
       Glabally things will work themselves out chaotically.
       JOW
       #Post#: 252--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Climate Doom
       By: John of Wallan Date: May 9, 2021, 9:30 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=John of Wallan link=topic=14.msg251#msg251
       date=1620613676]
       This guys lays out a good timeline for whats coming and why.
       Few seem to realise that no food means no humans... Most think
       7/11 will be open and fully stocked for our convenience; its
       always been that way!
       I dont agree 100% with his conspiracy theories about ánything
       being planned...
       We are going into chaotic times with no one in power doing much
       planning other than trying to get past next election cycle.
       Despite all the propaganda about if we change our ways we can
       save the planet, and continue on with our current lifestyles,
       its looking more and more like too little too late.
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-U45PMTOicM
       Do what you can on a local level.
       Glabally things will work themselves out chaotically.
       JOW
       [/quote]
       When I said this guy I meant the link to the ice age farmer in
       previous post. Not Guy M.
       He is unfortunately more and more accurately predicting what
       coming...
       JOW
       JOW
       #Post#: 253--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Climate Doom
       By: Digwe Must Date: May 10, 2021, 11:22 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       JOW
       Guy M and the Ice Age Farmer guy are on opposite sides of the
       climate change issue.
       About 15 years ago Guy M was saying that the methane clathrate
       problem gave us five years as a species at best.  The methane
       was supposed to emit into the atmosphere at such a rate as to
       cause massive explosions and flares.  I've seen other climate
       scientists expose the flaws in his work.  Guy M is a very bright
       man with tunnel vision.  He then had the personal crisis
       associated with his work "counseling" women with NTHE anxiety.
       This gave the folks questioning his conclusions ammunition to
       assail his credibility.
       Up until 2 years ago the Ice Age Farmer guy was claiming we were
       entering the grand solar minimum NOW.  Solar activity was going
       to continue to drop and we would be entering the next ice age
       now.  Since then the calculations and observations he used have
       been clarified.  Most observers believe we will be seeing the
       GSM in 2030 or the next solar cycle 11 years later.  The IAF guy
       claims that anthropogenic climate change is a hoax perpetrated
       by the shadow elites.
       Can they both be right?
       As Yogi Berra is reputed to have noted, predictions are hard -
       especially about the future.
       #Post#: 255--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Climate Doom
       By: K-Dog Date: May 10, 2021, 2:40 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [spoiler][quote author=Digwe Must link=topic=14.msg253#msg253
       date=1620663742]
       [img]
  HTML https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fthatchannel.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2018%2F09%2FGuy-McPherson-Abrupt-Climate-Change.png&f=1&nofb=1[/img]
       ******
       JOW
       Guy M and the Ice Age Farmer guy are on opposite sides of the
       climate change issue.
       About 15 years ago Guy M was saying that the methane clathrate
       problem gave us five years as a species at best.  The methane
       was supposed to emit into the atmosphere at such a rate as to
       cause massive explosions and flares.  I've seen other climate
       scientists expose the flaws in his work.  Guy M is a very bright
       man with tunnel vision.  He then had the personal crisis
       associated with his work "counseling" women with NTHE anxiety.
       This gave the folks questioning his conclusions ammunition to
       assail his credibility.
       Up until 2 years ago the Ice Age Farmer guy was claiming we were
       entering the grand solar minimum NOW.  Solar activity was going
       to continue to drop and we would be entering the next ice age
       now.  Since then the calculations and observations he used have
       been clarified.  Most observers believe we will be seeing the
       GSM in 2030 or the next solar cycle 11 years later.  The IAF guy
       claims that anthropogenic climate change is a hoax perpetrated
       by the shadow elites.
       Can they both be right?
       As Yogi Berra is reputed to have noted, predictions are hard -
       especially about the future.
       [/quote][/spoiler]
       My spoiler tags keep you from having to look at Guy McPherson
       again if you don't want to.
       I can express my feelings with a very simple statement:
       'Guy Mcpherson does not know **** about feedback theory.'
       And I know what time it is twice a day.
       I do not find someone who exploits irrational fears in the name
       of science to make his money amusing.  I realize in the world of
       doom I am an outlier since I do not feel the need to kiss Guy's
       ass just because he calls himself a climate scientist and is
       partial to white suits.
       [img]
  HTML https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.wtvq.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2018%2F02%2FColonel-Harland-Sanders.jpg&f=1&nofb=1[/img]
       The white suit is a dead giveaway when you think about it.  An
       obvious prop.  McPherson is Dinner Theater.
       Engineers, particularly Electrical Engineers have to understand
       how feedback works.  White suit wearing 'professors' I suspect
       do not do as much math as engineers do.  As the years roll by a
       chasm in abilities widens.  You don't use it you lose it don't
       you know.
       I find Guy's angst at people in mainstream media referring to
       tipping points as being far in the future amusing.  If Guy had
       not misrepresented tipping points as an event and instead as
       part of the naturally occurring interlocked processes they are,
       mainstream media would not have exploited his exploit.  Instead
       Guy makes facts something to argue about, and in this world
       white suits have no advantage.
       The Earth is a complicated mix of multiple feedback systems.
       All feedback loops have to be identified and evaluated
       quantitatively to know what the future holds.  Cherry picking
       data has no place.
       Guy makes people passive.  He is a thought stopper.
       [img]
  HTML https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fproductimages.worldofbooks.com%2F0435718134.jpg&f=1&nofb=1[/img]
       I doubt the book has a single mention of 'tipping point'.
       Engineers refer to a state as being unstable or a system as
       bi-stable.  Then they work out the math to describe how a
       physical system will respond to inputs over time.  Accuracy of
       prediction and not shock value is the criteria for success.
       Wo-wo panic is not involved.  An engineer generally will want to
       know exactly what will happen as the world collapses and the gas
       tank in the national car runs dry.  Wild speculation is
       appropriate for stories and for exploring possibilities.  But
       panic will solve nothing.
       #Post#: 256--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Climate Doom
       By: Phil Potts Date: May 10, 2021, 2:56 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I've never heard it explained why McPherson some years ago set
       up his community of near term climate extinction followers in
       Belize on the equator. It matters that he actually shows the
       headlines and abstracts of the studies and isn't just giving a
       presentation where he cites things with his own interpretation.
       He may realise he spent some credibility there. I don't have any
       problem with what he's presented here.
       On the question of solar minimum, im a sceptic. I don't see how
       you predict patterns of anything burning which is my
       understanding of what it's based on. Having said that, this past
       summer just ended, definitely felt very nice to be in the sun.
       When we came to Tasmania 8 yrs ago, we noticed the sun really
       bites, this past summer did not feel like that. I didn't hear
       about any 50C days on the mainland either, though I might have
       missed it if it happened. From my perspective, those were
       something new in the past decade and never happened before that.
       Locals here in Tasmania say that definitely the summers are much
       longer and there's a lot less rain overall than previous decades
       going back.
       For me the climate change question is not the highest priority
       because I don't believe humans have the right to always occupy
       every locality, whether it's tropical or near the poles. I think
       when the climate changes, people have to move. That seems to be
       a lot more the case with agriculture than hunter gatherer who
       have in fact used the lower sea level and sea ice to get across
       the berring strait or Torres strait . I think past civilizations
       have had to abandon the best temperate regions because of
       climate change they caused themselves by deforestation for
       agriculture and building. Now is no different and the scale of
       our land clearing, paving and building over everything makes the
       previous times seem insignificant. We can use our technology to
       delay but not entirely prevent it. We end up with less people
       where they can't all be supported and seasonal migration becomes
       an option again.
       That leads me to the rest of ice age farmers ideas. I fully
       agree with him on what we need to do and that alone is worth
       posting. Some of his other thoughts are still open questions to
       me. Eg a 'lack of cows' in Australia. I would say first that we
       have 'cattle' and the numbers in the tropical north that free
       roam over vast areas of bush and are rounded up by helicopter
       are huge herds, probably 20x more than found on farms with
       fences and fields plus feed lots, and we have a lot of those. He
       would not be aware of that, so would not know that it's drought
       that causes them to be slaughtered early and in greater numbers,
       as well as overused and drying up rivers for the dairy farmers
       that determines the numbers. I don't think it's because anyone
       has determined we can't eat meat. The paltry number of poultry
       in Russia could also be climate related, such as freezing.
       Meat is the most noticeable food inflation and that's been going
       on for about ten years. Lamb and Beef by about 70% in that time.
       I notice Americans talking about Pork the same way, though pork
       is still cheap here.
       It's obviously caused by more mouths to feed worldwide. Hundreds
       of millions who have been pulled out of their rural subsistence
       farming and sent to cities to work factories and whatever other
       services, all up and coming consumers needing feeding. Add to
       that the climate change we cause meaning less regular and
       reliable rainfall, more drought or devastating flood and
       depleted soil, putting more pressure on the whole industry, not
       just pastoral but also the examples of sourcing animal feed in
       china he mentioned.
       This is not to deny that there are globalists with an agenda, I
       agree with ice age farmer on that, just not his every suspicion.
       I do see another hugely self enriching and control consolidating
       war as part of their agenda and I've been saying it for a long
       time. The headlines of the last few months should vindicate my
       money being on that particular horseman of the apocalypse to pay
       out.
       Water wars as a result of climate change between numerous
       countries on major rivers that have supported civilization for
       thousands of years will definitely ignite. Many upstream dams
       and pumps on the nile, Blue Nile, Yangtze, Ganges, Yamuna and
       Euphrates among others will be bombed and wars breaking out over
       it.  For now, most countries that would be involved are only
       restrained by UN sanctions and resolutions they would face.
       That changes when we finally say enough of Russia and China's
       election meddling, aggression and genocide from decades ago we
       noticed in 2018. Saving the USD unlimited printing privilege
       would just be a bonus, not the primary purpose of the Pentagon
       team, im sure. That hail Mary is not going to make it in the
       hypersonic missile age anyway and the bankers know it, they
       would rather deal with all that debt by having it declared bk.
       Hunter Biden has already been appointed chairman of the
       Sinoslavic Worldwide Reconstruction company, based on his
       outstanding credentials.
       To me, what we get after all that, with numerous moves by many
       govts to take over resources of their neighbours, including the
       plentiful and clean, but giant crocodile infested rivers where
       all those cattle roam up north,  is a more important question
       than looking at attempting an orderly transition to clean energy
       as BAU. All the big cities around the world remaining
       functioning, with ongoing heating and cooling for optimal
       comfort just seems unlikely to me.
       #Post#: 257--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Climate Doom
       By: K-Dog Date: May 10, 2021, 3:41 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The  future  climate  for  Belize  and  the  Cen-tral America
       and Caribbean regions will likely be characterized by increasing
       temperatures and  declining  levels  of  precipitation.  These
       projections  have  been  confirmed  through
       HUMAN DEVELOPMENT ISSUES PAPERExECUTIVE SUMMARy6several analyses
       of climate models. One study projected a median temperature
       increase of 2.0°C  (3.6°F)  for  the  Caribbean  region  and
       3.2°C (5.7°F) for the Central American region, and they project
       a median decrease in annual precipitation  of  12%  for  the
       Caribbean  re-gion and 9% for the Central American region. The
       models also projected a 39% increase in extremely dry seasons
       for the Caribbean and a 33% increase for Central America.
       Another study generated regional estimates of future temperature
       and  precipitation,  and  project-ed  an  annual  average
       temperature  increase of  3.5°C  (6.4°F)  for  Central America,
       and  a decrease  in  precipitation  of  0.33mm  (0.013 inches)
       per day, or 120.45mm (4.7 inches) per year. Climate data for
       Belize were used to es-timate trends in average rainfall and
       tempera-tures  from  1960  through  2005.  Of  the  ten warmest
       years in the record, five of these oc-curred in the 1990s and
       four occurred since 2000. The trend analysis was combined with
       climate  projections  from  a  regional  climate model  to
       project  average  temperature  and rainfall  in  Belize  for
       the  period  2010-2100. Average  annual  temperatures  are
       expected to  increase  3.5°C  (6.4°F)  over  the  90-year
       period,  while  average  rainfall  is  expected  to decrease by
       100mm.
       Epstein had an Island.  Guy had Belize.
       I knew going there made no long term environmental sense and not
       an appropriate place to live for someone advocating change.
       There had to be other reasons.
       [quote]Manipulation and alleged sexual abuse of followers
       McPherson solicits donations from his followers,[14] which he
       uses in part to tour the world and give talks. On social media,
       he took on the role of grief counselor to help his followers
       emotionally cope with his claims of doom. A joint statement from
       several ex-followers summed this up as, "[McPherson] is in a
       position of authority with direct influence over the mental,
       emotional, and in some cases physical and monetary lives, of
       those who exist in a state of vulnerability."[15] In August of
       2017 McPherson was accused of sexual harassment by several
       ex-followers, who claim that his counseling with women often
       includes sexual advances or abuse.[16] Deep Green Resistance, a
       radical deep ecology group, was disturbed after finding that he
       called one woman a "cum-gargling ****", and will no longer work
       with him.[17] [/quote]
  HTML https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Guy_McPherson
       #Post#: 258--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Climate Doom
       By: K-Dog Date: May 10, 2021, 4:04 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Walking Away from Guy McPherson
  HTML https://discardingdoom.wordpress.com/2017/11/18/walking-away-from-guy-mcpherson/
       [quote]The following is written from a desire to protect the
       emotional and material well being and professional reputations
       of those who have been or would potentially be affected by the
       information offered here. I present my observations as fact
       which I would stand behind in a legal setting. Having consulted
       with legal counsel after being cc’d in a letter threatening a
       potential lawsuit at the behest of retired University of Arizona
       professor Guy McPherson, I feel comfortable moving forward with
       publishing this information. Because McPherson has repeatedly
       suggested pursuing legal action in the form of libel suits in
       regard to previous interactions with others, and has made some
       indications that he may pursue a lawsuit with regard to the kind
       of information disclosed here, I have approached this
       presentation primarily as a first person assessment and will
       make an effort to separate my direct observations from analysis,
       which can be freely disputed based on one’s own interpretation.
       As I wish to not be rhetorically overburdened by the use of such
       phrases as “I think,” and “I believe,” anything written here
       that cannot be directly observed should be viewed by the reader
       as conclusions which I have drawn, and thus should be weighed
       against the information provided.[/quote]
       It is a long article.  Juicy as fuck.
  HTML https://discardingdoom.files.wordpress.com/2017/11/guy-mcpherson-i-copy1.jpg
       The auto software can't turn fuck into **** when it is an image.
       Could it be that Homeland Security is behind the smearing of
       Guy?  Agree with Guy or consider him a lecherous POS, your
       choice.  But I have no doubt he is on more than one FBI list.
       #Post#: 261--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Climate Doom
       By: Phil Potts Date: May 10, 2021, 4:47 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=K-Dog link=topic=14.msg258#msg258 date=1620680663]
       Walking Away from Guy McPherson
  HTML https://discardingdoom.wordpress.com/2017/11/18/walking-away-from-guy-mcpherson/
       [quote]The following is written from a desire to protect the
       emotional and material well being and professional reputations
       of those who have been or would potentially be affected by the
       information offered here. I present my observations as fact
       which I would stand behind in a legal setting. Having consulted
       with legal counsel after being cc’d in a letter threatening a
       potential lawsuit at the behest of retired University of Arizona
       professor Guy McPherson, I feel comfortable moving forward with
       publishing this information. Because McPherson has repeatedly
       suggested pursuing legal action in the form of libel suits in
       regard to previous interactions with others, and has made some
       indications that he may pursue a lawsuit with regard to the kind
       of information disclosed here, I have approached this
       presentation primarily as a first person assessment and will
       make an effort to separate my direct observations from analysis,
       which can be freely disputed based on one’s own interpretation.
       As I wish to not be rhetorically overburdened by the use of such
       phrases as “I think,” and “I believe,” anything written here
       that cannot be directly observed should be viewed by the reader
       as conclusions which I have drawn, and thus should be weighed
       against the information provided.[/quote]
       It is a long article.  Juicy as ****.
  HTML https://discardingdoom.files.wordpress.com/2017/11/guy-mcpherson-i-copy1.jpg
       The auto software can't turn **** into **** when it is an image.
       Could it be that Homeland Security is behind the smearing of
       Guy?  Agree with Guy or consider him a lecherous POS, your
       choice.  But I have no doubt he is on more than one FBI list.
       [/quote]
       The problem there is not showing the exchange between mcP and
       Serena. What he was replying to and what replies he got, are
       needed to put it in context.
       #Post#: 262--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Climate Doom
       By: K-Dog Date: May 10, 2021, 5:47 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=John of Wallan link=topic=14.msg235#msg235
       date=1620205648]
       Bolox.
       Crap.
       Rubbish.
       Rhubarb.
       Another boondogle so someone can make money while delaying
       actually solving the issue.
       [spoiler]
       A carbon price will not work.
       It just forces a transition away from fossil fuels to something
       else with more unknown consequences.
       Thalidimide, DDT, CFC's , PCBs, asbestos all have useful
       characteristics, and initially un-forseen downsides...
       Every EV has a huge carbon footprint to manufacture and more
       complex systems and technology. We need to de-industrialise not
       re-industrialise to something new.
       We need less people too. I dont want it, but we need it. It will
       happen of its own accord shortly. We are in population overshoot
       measured by so many metrics: Desertification, over fishing,
       salinnation, loss of topsoil, peak oil, peak water,
       deforestation, peak helium, increased reliance on rare earth
       minerals, loss of biodiversity, peak phospherous.... Thats just
       what I can remember.
       [/spoiler]
       Perhaps we need organic self replicating transport systems.
       Think replicants in blade runner.
       I know: Horses!
       They run on grass. Thats carbon neutral.
       We have to stop thinking we can find a technical solution.
       Technology is the driver of our problems not the solution.
       Technology allowed us to go into overshoot. Stupidity keeps us
       here for now.
       JOW (The new ludite!)
       [/quote]
       The East Coast, specifically the MidAtlantic region, tends to
       produce rich pastures. In these areas, around 2 acres per horse
       will probably ensure enough for most horses’ needs.
       So much for grass fed steak.  It could get pricey.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page