URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FUNDAY
  HTML https://funday.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: CNPS Structured Discussion
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 212--------------------------------------------------
       BN-LK Discussion Highlights
       By: Admin Date: June 14, 2017, 11:05 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       __« April 22, 2017, 01:20:31 pm »
       Major Unexplained Science Facts & Alternative Models
       LK Ideas for Organizing a Wiki
       1. Plans to Improve the Scientific Method
       2. List Major Fields of Science
       3. List Major Science Facts & Flaws for Main CNPS Wiki Topics
       (See Sample Wiki thread.)
       Paraphrasing Bruce's Forum/Wiki Ideas
       a. Tell readers the goal is to produce one or more papers and
       Wikis.
       - Ask readers to submit other flaws &/or alternative theories
       b. To structure the topic put it into the forum as 3 co-located
       threads.
       - Create an outline of the local discussion & put it in your
       “coordination” post.
       - Use Mark’s MIT MAP concepts: Questions ( ? ),  Ideas (
       lightbulb),  pros and cons (thumbs up and down ) etc.
       Aether Lattice Holes Theory
       DEMOCRACY:
       __« April 23, 2017, 11:37:33 am »
       Invite: TB Members possibly interested in helping Improve
       Science:
       bdw000, BirdyNumNums, Brigit Bara, Chan Rasjid, chut, Cubit32,
       D_Archer, dd6, Elder, fractal-geoff, GaryN, GenesisAria, Grey
       Cloud, jacmac, JCG, JeffreyW, JHL, jimmcginn, Keith Ness,
       Kuldebar, Melusine, philalethes, Phorce, phyllotaxis, Pi sees,
       Plasmatic, pln2bz, popster1, RayTomes, Roshi, Rushthezeppelin,
       saul, seasmith, Solar, Sparky, StefanR, trevbus, Webbman,
       Zelectric, ZenMonkeyNZ, Zyxzevn
       __« April 23, 2017, 11:50:36 am »
       RESOURCES
       __« May 07, 2017, 12:08:53 pm »
       <BN: Phone
       Catastrophism Topic
       Expansion Tectonics
       So, a way to find people for your ideas is to post a request on
       that forum
       A second way is to compose an article for the monthly newsletter
       getting the newsletter, send a note directly to David de Hilster
       Third, there is a blog on the main website
       Re sedimentary rock strata, first do some literature analysis on
       the history of this topic
       LK's List of Topics
       I put a new forum in there for you: The Scientific Method.
       The list of facts and flaws is one of the issues I wanted to
       talk to you about directly.
       __May 8, 9AM
       do a test right here on FUNDAY
       __« May 11, 2017, 05:14:55 pm »
       Message to Dave Talbott re Wiki
       I started a thread called, Need Data to Help Create Alternative
       Science Wiki
       I have gotten a Catastrophism board and E.U. boards etc at the
       CNPS forum.
       __Postby Lloyd » Thu May 11, 2017 4:06 pm
       Initial preferred topics for discussion are:
       Catastrophism: Ancient Global Cataclysm
       Mythology: Ancient Myths
       Earth Sciences: Global Tectonics
       Astronomy: Solar Science
       __« May 21, 2017, 01:56:44 pm »
       >BN: the CNPS Wiki a collection of alternative science papers
       would help to establish a system for evaluating them
       Making the list of essential elements of each theory or claim
       then a process for evaluating each element
       CNPS could publicize the best theories
       __Sunday, May 21, 2017 2:45 PM
       <Bruce: find me ANY MM reports
       system for evaluating is my next TOP priority
       publishing a summary of what elements of ALL the papers were
       good breakthroughs
       reward great Peer Reviewers
       Peer Review Guidelines [from web search]
       __5/23/17 8:50AM
       >Bruce: date on the threads
       experiment with "peer reviewers"
       __« May 23, 2017, 09:21:11 pm »
       "sticky" function
       date labeling
       email string
       "probable" reviews would give a theory a high place in a WIKI
       summary reference to the dissents
       many theories submitted
       PHOTON; challenge this definition
       prioritizing
       __5/23 9 PM
       >Bruce: date labeling
       P.U.T structured format
       invite members
       Space Lattice Theory
       rate P.U.T.
       __Wednesday, May 24, 2017 4:38 PM
       <Bruce: suggest a better title
       membership fee
       Lattice Theory
       rating a few P.U.T. Elements
       __5/24 7:33 PM
       Hi Bruce: discussion thread
       I started 3 threads for "theory rating"
       I included the reasons for my I-ratings
       __« May 26, 2017, 07:28:59 pm »
       <BN: Inviting members
       "discussion summary" as a "status report"
       "coordination": coordination of the discussion
       "external inputs": to focus or promote the discussion
       "documentation"
       Possible solution
       __May 26, 2017, at 12:55 AM
       >Bruce: Why wouldn't each topic in the forum have a Working
       Paper thread?
       __Friday, May 26, 2017 10:39 AM
       <Bruce: multiple purposes for the structured forum
       break down disagreements among members
       structure to improve all discussions
       separate resolution
       member recruitment, CNPS marketing, promotion of papers, and
       expansion of conferences
       coordinating scientific research
       cover the needed structure issues
       __5/26 7:11 PM
       Hi Bruce: your structured forum goals
       A. Attempt to resolve disagreements among members:
       B. Set up bibliographies to reduce newbies' questions:
       C. Each section develop goals, like doing experiments, writing
       papers ... :
       D. Improve & promote CNPS & scientific research:
       CNPS forum survey eventually
       1st - purpose, status report & assignments
       2nd - wiki working paper
       3rd - bibliography & important outside viewpoints
       discussion section
       __Saturday, May 27, 2017 5:33 PM
       <Bruce: Important threads; using a "sticky" function
       bibliographies < many forums making a few contributions each
       8. Definitions
       __Wednesday, May 31, 2017 7:25 AM
       <Bruce: I can't do the rating without details
       I don't find value in the a simple rating scale
       help locate interested people
       __5/31) 11AM)
       >Bruce: "help locate interested people
       encyclopedic list of good alternative theories
       PUT rating I, which was helpful
       __6/1 - 11AM
       >Bruce: let members start their own threads in any of those 9
       sections
       let moderators request moderator-controlled threads
       consulted with any forum experts?
       __« June 02, 2017, 09:55:43 pm »
       Hi Bruce: start one or two threads in section 1
       your critique of my 8-point scientific method
       repeats of the MM experiment
       5-part idea
       Store raw data
       Self-organize teams to rectify false media claims
       corporate greed
       __Monday, June 5, 2017 1:45 PM
       <BN: Members can post new Threads, but not "forums"
       email notification
       MM experiment repeats
       raw data
       __« June 09, 2017, 02:29:14 pm »
       REVIEW PROCESS
       __Friday, June 9, 2017 10:00 AM
       <Bruce:  I ratings vs P (probable) " ratings
       guide a number of members to review them in depth
       be published by CNPS + indexed
       __Fri 6/9 2:23PM
       >Bruce: look for fellow reviewers?
       essential elements of P.U.T. that most interest me
       *****************************************************