DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FUNDAY
HTML https://funday.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: LK3 Impacts
*****************************************************
#Post#: 116--------------------------------------------------
TW/Young Planets
By: Admin Date: February 5, 2017, 9:38 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Age of the Earth: Creation.com
Young Earth Evidence
HTML http://qdl.scs-inc.us/?top=4741-4760-5079-9754-11383-12775
HTML http://creation.com/age-of-the-earth
101 evidences for a young age of the earth and the universe
by Don Batten
Published: 4 June 2009(GMT+10)
Young Earth Evidence from Human History and from BIology
Young Earth Evidence from Geology
Young Earth Evidence from Radiometric Dating
Young Solar System Evidence from Astronomy
Additional Sources
- Astronomical evidence for a young(er) age of the earth and the
universe
Saturn's rings are increasingly recognized as being relatively
short-lived rather than essentially changeless over millions of
years.
-
HTML http://creation.com/images/pdfs/tj/j17_1/j17_1_5-6.pdf
-
HTML http://creation.com/lunar-volcanoes-rock-long-age-timeframe
Evidence of recent volcanic activity on Earth's moon is
inconsistent with its supposed vast age because it should have
long since cooled if it were billions of years old. See:
Transient lunar phenomena: a permanent problem for evolutionary
models of Moon formation and Walker, T., and Catchpoole, D.,
Lunar volcanoes rock long-age timeframe, Creation 31(3):18,
2009. See further corroboration: "At Long Last, Moon's Core
'Seen'";
HTML http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2011/01/at-long-last-moons-core-seen.html?rss=1
-
HTML http://creation.com/article/764
Recession of the moon from the earth. Tidal friction causes the
moon to recede from the earth at 4 cm per year. It would have
been greater in the past when the moon and earth were closer
together. The moon and earth would have been in catastrophic
proximity (Roche limit) at less than a quarter of their supposed
age.
-
HTML http://creation.com/moons-magnetic-puzzle
The moon's former magnetic field. Rocks sampled from the moon's
crust have residual magnetism that indicates that the moon once
had a magnetic field much stronger than earth's magnetic field
today. No plausible 'dynamo' hypothesis could account for even a
weak magnetic field, let alone a strong one that could leave
such residual magnetism in a billions-of-years time-frame. The
evidence is much more consistent with a recent creation of the
moon and its magnetic field and free decay of the magnetic field
in the 6,000 years since then. Humphreys, D.R., The moon's
former magnetic field—still a huge problem for evolutionists,
Journal of Creation 26(1):5–6, 2012.
-
HTML http://creationresearch.org/creation_matters/pdf/1999/cm0401.pdf
-
HTML http://creation.com/cratering
-
HTML http://creation.com/lunar-volcanoes-rock-long-age-timeframe
Ghost craters on the moon's maria (singular mare: dark 'seas'
formed from massive lava flows) are a problem for the assumed
long ages. Enormous impacts evidently caused the large craters
and lava flows within those craters, and this lava partly buried
other, smaller impact craters within the larger craters, leaving
'ghosts'. But this means that the smaller impacts can't have
been too long after the huge ones, otherwise the lava would have
flowed into the larger craters before the smaller impacts. This
suggests a very narrow time frame for all this cratering, and by
implication the other cratered bodies of our solar system. They
suggest that the cratering occurred quite quickly. See Fryman,
H., Ghost craters in the sky, Creation Matters 4(1):6, 1999; A
biblically based cratering theory (Faulkner); Lunar volcanoes
rock long-age timeframe.
-
HTML http://creation.com/mercury-the-tiny-planet-that-causes-big-problems-for-evolution
-
HTML http://creation.com/journal-of-creation-223
The presence of a significant magnetic field around Mercury is
not consistent with its supposed age of billions of years. A
planet so small should have cooled down enough so any liquid
core would solidify, preventing the evolutionists' 'dynamo'
mechanism. See also, Humphreys, D.R., Mercury's magnetic field
is young! Journal of Creation 22(3):8–9, 2008.
-
HTML http://creation.com/the-earths-magnetic-field-evidence-that-the-earth-is-young
The outer planets Uranus and Neptune have magnetic fields, but
they should be long 'dead' if they are as old as claimed
according to evolutionary long-age beliefs. Assuming a solar
system age of thousands of years, physicist Russell Humphreys
successfully predicted the strengths of the magnetic fields of
Uranus and Neptune.
-
HTML http://creation.com/focus-194
-
HTML http://creation.com/ganymede-magnetic-moon
Jupiter's larger moons, Ganymede, Io, and Europa, have magnetic
fields, which they should not have if they were billions of
years old, because they have solid cores and so no dynamo could
generate the magnetic fields. This is consistent with
creationist Humphreys' predictions. See also, Spencer, W.,
Ganymede: the surprisingly magnetic moon, Journal of Creation
23(1):8–9, 2009.
-
HTML http://creation.com/article/685
Volcanically active moons of Jupiter (Io) are consistent with
youthfulness (Galileo mission recorded 80 active volcanoes). If
Io had been erupting over 4.5 billion years at even 10% of its
current rate, it would have erupted its entire mass 40 times. Io
looks like a young moon and does not fit with the supposed
billions of year's age for the solar system. Gravitational
tugging from Jupiter and other moons accounts for only some of
the excess heat produced.
-
HTML http://creation.com/store
The surface of Jupiter's moon Europa. Studies of the few craters
indicated that up to 95% of small craters, and many medium-sized
ones, are formed from debris thrown up by larger impacts. This
means that there have been far fewer impacts than had been
thought in the solar system and the age of other objects in the
solar system, derived from cratering levels, have to be reduced
drastically (see Psarris, Spike, What you aren't being told
about astronomy, volume 1: Our created solar system DVD,
available from CMI).
-
HTML http://creation.com/focus-273-creation-magazine
-
HTML http://creation.com/redirect.php?http://www.astrobio.net/index.php?option=com_retrospection&task=detail&id=1478
Methane on Titan (Saturn's largest moon)—the methane should all
be gone because of UV-induced breakdown. The products of
photolysis should also have produced a huge sea of heavier
hydrocarbons such as ethane. An Astrobiology item titled "The
missing methane" cited one of the Cassini researchers, Jonathan
Lunine, as saying, "If the chemistry on Titan has gone on in
steady-state over the age of the solar system, then we would
predict that a layer of ethane 300 to 600 meters thick should be
deposited on the surface." No such sea is seen, which is
consistent with Titan being a tiny fraction of the claimed age
of the solar system (needless to say, Lunine does not accept the
obvious young age implications of these observations, so he
speculates, for example, that there must be some unknown source
of methane).
-
HTML http://creation.com/the-age-and-fate-of-saturns-rings
The rate of change / disappearance of Saturn's rings is
inconsistent with their supposed vast age; they speak of
youthfulness.
- Enceladus, a moon of Saturn, looks young. Astronomers working
in the 'billions of years' mindset thought that this moon would
be cold and dead, but it is a very active moon, spewing massive
jets of water vapour and icy particles into space at supersonic
speeds, consistent with a much younger age. Calculations show
that the interior would have frozen solid after 30 million years
(less than 1% of its supposed age); tidal friction from Saturn
does not explain its youthful activity (Psarris, Spike, What you
aren't being told about astronomy, volume 1: Our created solar
system DVD; Walker, T., 2009. Enceladus: Saturn's sprightly moon
looks young, Creation 31(3):54–55).
-
HTML http://creation.com/article/685
Miranda, a small moon of Uranus, should have been long since
dead, if billions of years old, but its extreme surface features
suggest otherwise. See Revelations in the solar system.
-
HTML http://creation.com/neptune-monument-to-creation
Neptune should be long since 'cold', lacking strong wind
movement if it were billions of years old, yet Voyager II in
1989 found it to be otherwise—it has the fastest winds in the
entire solar system. This observation is consistent with a young
age, not billions of years. See Neptune: monument to creation.
-
HTML http://creation.com/revelations-in-the-solar-system
Neptune's rings have thick regions and thin regions. This
unevenness means they cannot be billions of years old, since
collisions of the ring objects would eventually make the ring
very uniform. Revelations in the solar system.
-
HTML http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019103507003004
Young surface age of Neptune's moon, Triton—less than 10 million
years, even with evolutionary assumptions on rates of impacts
(see Schenk, P.M., and Zahnle, K. On the Negligible Surface Age
of Triton, Icarus 192(1):135–149, 2007.
*****************************************************