URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FUNDAY
  HTML https://funday.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: LK2 Fossils & Dating
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 115--------------------------------------------------
       From Creation.com
       By: Admin Date: February 5, 2017, 9:20 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Age of the Earth: Creation.com
       Young Earth Evidence
  HTML http://qdl.scs-inc.us/?top=4741-4760-5079-9754-11383-12775
  HTML http://creation.com/age-of-the-earth
       101 evidences for a young age of the earth and the universe
       by Don Batten
       Published: 4 June 2009(GMT+10)
       Young Earth Evidence from Human History and from BIology
       Young Earth Evidence from Geology
       Young Earth Evidence from Radiometric Dating
       Young Solar System Evidence from Astronomy
       Additional Sources
       - - Young Earth Evidence from Geology
       -
  HTML http://creation.com/world-s-oldest-salt-lake-only-a-few-thousand-years-old
       The amount of salt in the world's oldest lake contradicts its
       supposed age and suggests an age more consistent with its
       formation after Noah's Flood, which is consistent with a young
       age of the earth.
       -
  HTML http://creation.com/surtsey-the-young-island-that-looks-old
       -
  HTML http://creation.com/tuluman-a-test-of-time
       Observed examples of rapid island formation and maturation, such
       as Surtsey, which confound the notion that such islands take
       long periods of time to form. See also, Tuluman—A Test of Time.
       -
  HTML http://creation.com/redirect.php?http://www.icr.org/article/98
       The recent and almost simultaneous origin of all the high
       mountain ranges around the world—including the Himalayas, the
       Alps, the Andes, and the Rockies—which have undergone most of
       the uplift to their present elevations beginning 'five million'
       years ago, whereas mountain building processes have supposedly
       been around for up to billions of years. See Baumgardner, J.,
       Recent uplift of today's mountains. Impact 381, March 2005.
       - Niagara Falls
       Erosion rates at places like Niagara Falls are consistent with a
       time frame of several thousand years since Noah's Flood.
       -
  HTML http://creation.com/niagara-falls-and-the-bible
       Erosion at Niagara Falls and other such places is consistent
       with just a few thousand years since the biblical Flood.
       However, much of the Niagara Gorge likely formed very rapidly
       with the catastrophic drainage of glacial Lake Agassiz; see:
       Climate change, Niagara and catastrophe.
       - River delta growth rate is consistent with thousands of years
       since the biblical Flood, not vast periods of time. The argument
       goes back to Mark Twain. E.g. 1. Mississippi—Creation Research
       Quarterly (CRSQ) 9:96–114, 1992; CRSQ 14:77; CRSQ 25:121–123.
       E.g. 2 Tigris–Euphrates: CRSQ 14:87, 1977.
       -
  HTML http://creation.com/redirect.php?http://www.icr.org/quotes
       Underfit streams. River valleys are too large for the streams
       they contain. Dury speaks of the "continent-wide distribution of
       underfit streams". Using channel meander characteristics, Dury
       concluded that past streams frequently had 20–60 times their
       current discharge. This means that the river valleys would have
       been carved very quickly, not slowly over eons of time. See
       Austin, S.A., Did landscapes evolve? Impact 118, 1983.
       -
  HTML http://creation.com/salty-seas-evidence-for-a-young-earth
       Amount of salt in the sea. Even ignoring the effect of the
       biblical Flood and assuming zero starting salinity and all rates
       of input and removal so as to maximize the time taken to
       accumulate all the salt, the maximum age of the oceans, 62
       million years, is less than 1/50 of the age evolutionists claim
       for the oceans. This suggests that the age of the earth is
       radically less also.
       -
  HTML http://creation.com/evidence-for-a-young-world
       The amount of sediment on the sea floors at current rates of
       land erosion would accumulate in just 12 million years; a blink
       of the eye compared to the supposed age of much of the ocean
       floor of up to 3 billion years. Furthermore, long-age geologists
       reckon that higher erosion rates applied in the past, which
       shortens the time frame. From a biblical point of view, at the
       end of Noah's Flood lots of sediment would have been added to
       the sea with the water coming off the unconsolidated land,
       making the amount of sediment perfectly consistent with a
       history of thousands of years.
       - Iron-manganese nodules (IMN) on the sea floors. The measured
       rates of growth of these nodules indicates an age of only
       thousands of years. Lalomov, A.V., 2006. Mineral deposits as an
       example of geological rates. CRSQ 44(1):64–66.
       -
  HTML http://creation.com/images/pdfs/tj/j14_3/j14_3_83-90.pdf
       The age of placer deposits (concentrations of heavy metals such
       as tin in modern sediments and consolidated sedimentary rocks).
       The measured rates of deposition indicate an age of thousands of
       years, not the assumed millions. See Lalomov, A.V., and
       Tabolitch, S.E., 2000. Age determination of coastal submarine
       placer, Val'cumey, northern Siberia. Journal of Creation (TJ)
       14(3):83–90.
       - Pressure in oil / gas wells indicate the recent origin of the
       oil and gas. If they were many millions of years old we would
       expect the pressures to equilibrate, even in low permeability
       rocks. "Experts in petroleum prospecting note the impossibility
       of creating an effective model given long and slow oil
       generation over millions of years (Petukhov, 2004). In their
       opinion, if models demand the standard multimillion-years
       geochronological scale, the best exploration strategy is to
       drill wells on a random grid." —Lalomov, A.V., 2007. Mineral
       deposits as an example of geological rates. CRSQ 44(1):64–66.
       -
  HTML http://creation.com/caving-in-to-reality
       Measured rates of stalactite and stalagmite growth in limestone
       caves are consistent with a young age of several thousand years.
       See also articles on limestone cave formation.
       -
  HTML http://creation.com/the-earths-magnetic-field-evidence-that-the-earth-is-young
       The decay of the earth's magnetic field. Exponential decay is
       evident from measurements and is consistent with theory of free
       decay since creation, suggesting an age of the earth of only
       thousands of years. For further evidence that it follows
       exponential decay with a time constant of 1611 years (±10) see:
       Humphreys, R., Earth's magnetic field is decaying steadily—with
       a little rhythm, CRSQ 47(3):193–201; 2011.
       -
  HTML http://creation.com/lord-kelvin-revisited-on-the-young-age-of-the-earth
       Excess heat flow from the earth is consistent with a young age
       rather than billions of years, even taking into account heat
       from radioactive decay. See Woodmorappe, J., 1999. Lord Kelvin
       revisited on the young age of the earth, Journal of Creation
       (TJ) 13(1):14, 1999.
       -----
       Re: Hydrocarbons in the Deep Earth?
  HTML http://www.thunderbolts.inf
       o/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=2150&sid=c812216a6d211b1444ac
       fc893e19f7bf&start=225#p41008
       postby webolife » Fri Oct 08, 2010 3:12 pm
       Actually no, not permineralization in the conventional sense of
       long slow replacement of minerals into cellular tissue.
       The "infusion" I was speaking of was the abiotic infusion of
       methane into sediments containing the plant and other materials
       causing a more rapid "transmutation" as it were of carbohydrates
       into hydrocarbons. The "glassy" appearance of petrified wood,
       however, is belied by the FACT that microscopic cellular
       structures are often preserved in the fossilized wood. The
       better describer of these woods is "opal" [quartz included with
       water]. This can be done in hours in the lab, and hot
       silica-saturated water in a matrix of clay is the main agent.
       The stuff I've collected over in Frenchmen Hills in E.
       Washington has many structures well detailed in cross-sections,
       including "separated" pithy materials that come out almost like
       toothpicks. Anyway, I'm open to electrification as a heat
       source, but still in wondering mode about the mechanisms of
       direct electrical transmutation.
       Mummified Dinosaurs / electric fossilization...?
  HTML http://www.thunderbolts.inf
       o/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=123&sid=4fabd2f6bf098ea2c40c9
       6ea9994d74e&start=135#p20294
       postby Lloyd » Mon Apr 27, 2009 9:00 pm
       * Well, I'm still working on comparing fresh bones with fossil
       bones.
  HTML http://www.enchantedlearning.com/subjects/dinosaurs/dinofossils/Fossilhow.html
       -     * The fossil has the same shape as the original object,
       but is chemically more like a rock! Some of the original
       hydroxy-apatite (a major bone consitiuent) remains, although it
       is saturated with silica (rock).
       * There are six ways that organisms can turn into fossils,
       including:
       -1* unaltered preservation (like insects or plant parts
       trapped in amber, a hardened form of tree sap)
       -2* permineralization=petrification (in which rock-like
       minerals seep in slowly and replace the original organic tissues
       with silica, calcite or pyrite, forming a rock-like fossil - can
       preserve hard and soft parts - most bone and wood fossils are
       permineralized)
       -3* replacement (An organism's hard parts dissolve and are
       replaced by other minerals, like calcite, silica, pyrite, or
       iron)
       -4* carbonization=coalification (in which only the carbon
       remains in the specimen - other elements, like hydrogen, oxygen,
       and nitrogen are removed)
       -5* recrystalization (hard parts either revert to more
       stable minerals or small crystals turn into larger crystals)
       -6* authigenic preservation (molds and casts of organisms
       that have been destroyed or dissolved).
       - * This, however, is another possible means of fossilization in
       a short time.
  HTML http://www.scienceagainstevolution.org/v10i6n.htm*
       -     After some experimentation, the researchers found a way to
       overcome a dead bird's buoyancy. When a carcass was dropped onto
       moist sediments that contained clay, the material soaked into
       the bird's feathers and bound the body to the mud in just a few
       minutes. Later, when water was added to the tank, the
       stuck-in-the-mud carcass remained submerged. 5
       * Taking their work even further, Krauss and his team added
       enough sediment to the tanks to bury the submerged carcasses.
       Then, they placed weights on the mud to increase the pressure,
       as a naturally buried body would experience if accumulating lake
       sediments gradually covered it. The team left the bodies in
       place for 3 years.
       * When the researchers unearthed their samples, they found
       that the patterns and extent of preservation of the faux-fossil
       birds were remarkably similar to those seen in actual fossils
       millions of years old. This resemblance suggests that the
       remains of ancient birds might have begun their process of
       fossilization in just such a way, Krauss notes. The team's
       findings may enable scientists to better interpret fossils and
       deduce the environments in which they formed, he adds. 6
       * You’ve probably read creationist claims of hats or fence
       posts that fossilized in just a few years. Creationists
       generally claim that the proper conditions, not long periods of
       time, are all that are needed for fossilization. That’s what
       Briggs’ experiment showed. Briggs doesn’t know exactly what the
       proper conditions are, but some eggs mineralized, and some
       didn’t, despite being buried for the same amount of time.
       Furthermore, the durations of the tests were very short,
       geologically speaking. It took just weeks or months for the
       process to begin. If they had more patience, they would have
       seen more mineralization (in those situations where the
       conditions were favorable).
       - * This is just kind of interesting.
  HTML http://www.desertusa.com/mag06/may/shells.html
       -     * Some clamshell fossils contain up to a hundred fish
       fossils inside.
       - postby Lloyd » Mon Apr 27, 2009 9:33 pm
       * In my recent message I said I found that for fresh bones the
       Total bone composition is: 45% O, 15% H, 15% Ca, 13% C, 9% P
       * In the last message I quoted a statement on fossil bone
       contents as either: calcite [crystallized calcium carbonate
       CaCO3], silica [SiO2], pyrite [iron disulfide FeS2], or iron.
       * Here's a side-by-side comparison [1st column is fresh bone
       contents]:
       O Ca C H P ........ bones
       O Ca C Si S Fe .... fossils
       * This shows that calcium sometimes remains as calcium;
       P+H or O+O may combine by transmutation to form S, part of
       pyrite;
       O+C may likewise combine to form Si, part of silica;
       Si+4Li or 2Si-2H may form Fe, part of pyrite.
       * So the existing contents of fresh bone can supply the elements
       found in fossil bones.
       *****************************************************