URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FUNDAY
  HTML https://funday.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: LK3 Impacts
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 57--------------------------------------------------
       CC/IMPACTS
       By: Admin Date: January 24, 2017, 7:59 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       DECAY RATE INCREASE WITH TEMP INCREASE
       Light Curves, by Charles Chandler
  HTML http://qdl.scs-inc.us/?top=18943
       [Scientists] neglect differences in the radioactive decay rates
       depending on temperature.10,11 ... (I)t's more likely that the
       crust cooled slowly, and thus the radioactive decay rate would
       have run faster, thereby falsely reporting a greater age.
       11. Emery, G. T., Perturbation of Nuclear Decay Rates, 1972/12,
       Annual Review of Nuclear Science, Vol 22, pp165-202
  HTML http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.ns.22.120172.001121
       10. Sur le rayonnement du radium à la température de l'hydrogène
       liquide, 1913/06,
  HTML http://radium.journaldephysique.org/articles/radium/pdf/1913/06/radium_1913__10_6_181_0.pdf
       Curie, P.; Onnes, M. K., MASSON ET CIE, Editeurs, Journal de
       Physique: Le Radium, Vol 10, Issue 6, pp 181-186
  HTML http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/radium:01913001006018100
       Causes of Planetary Cratering and Scarring
  HTML http://qdl.scs-inc.us/?top=10962
       Impact Craters by Thermonuclear Explosion
  HTML http://thunderbolts.inf
       o/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=7315&start=120#p76229
       Postby CharlesChandler» Tue Jan 15, 2013 6:10am
       .LK: Other TPODs propose that most impact craters are formed
       from similar megalightning, rather than from bolide impacts.
       - Do you think the craters are likely formed by lightning or
       bolide impacts?
       .CC: I think that all of the perfectly circular craters are
       formed by thermonuclear explosions.
       - The instantaneous temperatures and pressures in the impact of
       a rock even only a couple of meters across, but traveling at 70
       km/s, will be sufficient for nuclear fusion.
       - The craters are circular, instead of oblong, because they were
       caused by the relativistic ejecta from the fusion event, not the
       trajectory of the impacter.
       - And there is nothing to be found of the meteor because it was
       all reduced to plasma by the explosion.
       Thermonuclear Explosions from Impacts
  HTML http://thunderbolts.inf
       o/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=7315&start=120#p76424
       LK: Thermonuclear Explosions from Impacts: If cratering is
       pretty easy to explain by your theory, could you provide the
       main details of the crater forming process for us? - How does
       high velocity impact produce thermonuclear explosion?
       .CC: It isn't such a fancy hypothesis, actually.
       - The simple facts are that nuclear fusion requires extreme
       temperatures (to get particle collisions that break up the
       existing nuclei) and extreme pressures (to keep the pieces from
       going anywhere until they get a chance to clank back together
       into larger nuclei).
       - In an impact, the momentum is thermalized, so there's the heat
       source.
       - And until all of the momentum is thermalized, the remaining
       inertial force provides the pressure.
       - And there is no theoretical limit to the amount of energy that
       can be stored in momentum.
       - The velocity "might" be limited to the speed of light, but
       there is no limit on the amount of mass involved.
       - So at least hypothetically, it's an easy reach to conclude
       that an impact would create the necessary temperatures and
       pressures for fusion.
       - A physicist would be able to tell you exactly how much mass,
       of what element, moving at what speed, would be required to get
       how much fusion.
       - I'm satisfied that it's a hypothetical possibility, and that
       its properties match the observations.
       Call for Criticisms on New Solar Model
  HTML http://www.thunderbolts.inf
       o/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=76043&sid=7c697f77e579170b905d85d
       094b5d5c6#p76424
       Postby CharlesChandler» Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:38am
       .Q: How does high velocity impact produce thermonuclear
       explosion?
       .CC: Nuclear fusion requires extreme temperatures (to get
       particle collisions that break up the existing nuclei) and
       extreme pressures (to keep the pieces from going anywhere until
       they get a chance to clank back together into larger nuclei).
       - In an impact, the momentum is thermalized, so there's the heat
       source.
       - And until all of the momentum is thermalized, the remaining
       inertial force provides the pressure.
       - And there is no theoretical limit to the amount of energy that
       can be stored in momentum.
       - The velocity "might" be limited to the speed of light, but
       there is no limit on the amount of mass involved.
       - So at least hypothetically, it's an easy reach to conclude
       that an impact would create the necessary temperatures and
       pressures for fusion.
       - I'm satisfied that it's a hypothetical possibility, and that
       its properties match the observations.
       FUSION & GAMMA RAYS
  HTML http://qdl.scs-inc.us/?top=5738
       the combined speed between opposing charge streams in the
       toroidal plasmoid will be double that — 1.72 c! At that rate,
       the magnetic pinch will be extremely robust, and the ohmic
       heating will create extreme temperatures — easily the conditions
       necessary for nuclear fusion. - This is interesting because one
       of the telltale signs of nuclear fusion in the laboratory is the
       release of gamma rays, and we certainly observe such radiation
       during the formation of certain types of stars. But in the
       standard model, such observations shouldn't be possible in
       space. Gamma rays are absorbed by the thinnest of gas clouds.
       *****************************************************