DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
*****************************************************
#Post#: 110379--------------------------------------------------
Re: Guidance Needed Please - UKCPS - No Stopping - Leeds Railway
Station - Moorside Legal
DIR By: ChrisS
Date: February 19, 2026, 11:53 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Revised uploads below. Hopefully easier to read.
HTML https://i.postimg.cc/x8VtMsL9/Scan2026-02-19-174242.png
HTML https://i.postimg.cc/rwsC067Z/Scan2026-02-19-174405.png
HTML https://i.postimg.cc/JzYxP7bV/Scan2026-02-19-174334.png
HTML https://i.postimg.cc/N04gWVjG/Scan2026-02-19-174405.png
#Post#: 110436--------------------------------------------------
Re: Guidance Needed Please - UKCPS - No Stopping - Leeds Railway
Station - Moorside Legal
DIR By: InterCity125
Date: February 20, 2026, 2:07 am
---------------------------------------------------------
If it were me, I would respond with a simple reply pointing out
that I am the keeper and that liability is denied.
To whom it may concern,
I write in response to your letter of claim.
I am the vehicle keeper.
Liability for the alleged debt is denied in its entirety.
For the purposes of clarity; the vehicle driver is not known to
your client and there is no legal requirement for me to reveal
the driver.
Your assertion that the keeper can still be held liable is also
rebutted and has no basis in law whatsoever - if you are in any
doubt over this then I would respectfully draw your attention to
the Judge's comments in the Appeal Court case of VCS v Edward.
Your feeble attempts to imply keeper liability are a very
obvious attempt to circumvent the requirements of PoFA - if what
you suggest were true then PoFA need not exist.
I would also point out that, having examined the evidence, it is
clear that the vehicle driver appears to be stopped briefly on
double yellow lines - double yellow lines constitute a statutory
road marking with specific meaning - double yellow lines DO NOT
mean 'No Stopping' and, as such, your client's attempts to
enforce a no stopping zone are in clear violation of their Code
of Practice which demands that signage and markings be
UNAMBIGUOUS in nature - in this instance, the markings are in
direct contradiction of the alleged term of 'no stopping' -
double red lines would be needed in order to satisfy the
requirements of your client's Code of Practice.
I feel that I have now set out my legal position.
I am sorry that I cannot help you further.
Best wishes,
xxxxxx xxxxxxxxx
#Post#: 110450--------------------------------------------------
Re: Guidance Needed Please - UKCPS - No Stopping - Leeds Railway
Station - Moorside Legal
DIR By: ChrisS
Date: February 20, 2026, 4:25 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Hi, thankyou, I will respond as you suggest. I doubt this will
conclude matters, given what I have read on other posts here so
when I hear back from them, do I resume on this post please ?
Many thanks in advance.
#Post#: 110451--------------------------------------------------
Re: Guidance Needed Please - UKCPS - No Stopping - Leeds Railway
Station - Moorside Legal
DIR By: jfollows
Date: February 20, 2026, 4:30 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Yes.
Please don’t start a new thread, just add to this one.
#Post#: 112664--------------------------------------------------
Re: Guidance Needed Please - UKCPS - No Stopping - Leeds Railway
Station - Moorside Legal
DIR By: ChrisS
Date: March 10, 2026, 6:43 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Hello again, Moorside Legal have responded promptly - please see
below link.
Link removed
I have logged into their portal to view the reply claimed to
reside in the "my documents" section and a message pops up to
say "Oops, this page currently isn't available, please try again
or contact us" Needless to say repeated attempts yield the same
outcome.
#Post#: 112679--------------------------------------------------
Re: Guidance Needed Please - UKCPS - No Stopping - Leeds Railway
Station - Moorside Legal
DIR By: InterCity125
Date: March 10, 2026, 7:26 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Normal drivel from the hapless Moorside Legal.
You could replay with the following;
To whom it may concern,
I write in response to your letter dated 5th March 2026.
I am the vehicle keeper and the driver it not known by your
client.
Once again, I refute that any monies are owed by me (the keeper)
to either you or your client.
Your client should contact the driver directly if they feel that
a parking charge is owed - I will not be providing driver
details because the law does not require it.
The Letter Before Claim was from Moorside Legal and, as such, my
replies are directed at you and not your client.
My previous letter was NOT an appeal but a legitimate response
by myself to a LBC.
Your latest letter contains a clear legal inaccuracy which is
specifically designed to mislead me into thinking that the
vehicle keeper can be held liable in a scenario where the
legislation clearly shows that keeper liability is specifically
excluded.
Given that Moorside are being extensively investigated (by the
SRA) I am surprised that you continue to deliberately
misrepresent your true legal position in matters such as these.
The fact is that liability remains with the unknown driver - you
do not have the legal authority to reallocate liability in the
manner which you imply.
Your client and yourselves are, of course, entitled to pursue a
registered keeper for any reason you wish - that is your right
as a Claimant - however, this is, as a County Court Judge
recently pointed out to a parking operator (who was attempting
to rely on 'reasonable assumption' to move liability onto a
keeper), 'This is actually a commercial decision by the parking
operator and NOT an already established legal position'
(paraphrased). The Judge then continued by pointing out that a
parking operator 'must still PROVE their case in the same manner
as any other Claimant and that an assumption of who was driving
must still be materially evidenced in order to establish that
the keeper was liable' (paraphrased).
So, to be clear, at the present time the liability remains with
the individual who formed the alleged contract with your client
- you cannot simply shift liability due to that inconvenience.
Liability in this matter has NEVER been with the vehicle keeper
at any stage.
I also note that your previous letter does not address the other
aspects which were raised.
In particular, the contradictory road markings demonstrated by
your client's own evidence.
I am sorry that I cannot help your further in this matter.
Have a great day,
xxxxx xxxxxxx
#Post#: 112699--------------------------------------------------
Re: Guidance Needed Please - UKCPS - No Stopping - Leeds Railway
Station - Moorside Legal
DIR By: ChrisS
Date: March 10, 2026, 9:26 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Hi, thank you for the quick and detailed response, I will do as
you suggest.
Could I ask if the SRA investigations against Moorside are
documented / evidenced somewhere the general public would have
access to ?
Many thanks
#Post#: 112706--------------------------------------------------
Re: Guidance Needed Please - UKCPS - No Stopping - Leeds Railway
Station - Moorside Legal
DIR By: Dave65
Date: March 10, 2026, 9:49 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Best to remove the personal details of the upload, (address
etc).
#Post#: 112709--------------------------------------------------
Re: Guidance Needed Please - UKCPS - No Stopping - Leeds Railway
Station - Moorside Legal
DIR By: ChrisS
Date: March 10, 2026, 10:02 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Good point - thanks for the reminder !
#Post#: 112776--------------------------------------------------
Re: Guidance Needed Please - UKCPS - No Stopping - Leeds Railway
Station - Moorside Legal
DIR By: NandoChutney
Date: March 11, 2026, 2:16 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I should point out that the line about there not being clear
signage might not work, because there are massive red and white
signs that say "No stopping" in letters the size of my head and
"£100 charge if you stop" in letters not that much smaller. You
can see them on Street View.
*****************************************************
Page 2 of 4
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page