DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
*****************************************************
#Post#: 110042--------------------------------------------------
Another Moorside Legal Court Case
DIR By: MYKA
Date: February 17, 2026, 5:18 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Hi everyone,
Just wanted to put this here for your reference as this forum
has helped me a lot.
I had a meditation call this week for a Parking Charge Notice
from that is being handled by Moorside Legal clowns.
The details of the person carrying out these mediation calls
are:
Sheezah Sami
Litigation Paralegal
Liability denied and their offer of a reduced sum was rejected.
I also have paperwork signed by John Moody, also a Litigation
Paralegal.
Do I let this just go to court and point out they are conducting
litigation when they are not supposed to or is there something I
should do before then?
Cheers in advance
#Post#: 110047--------------------------------------------------
Re: Another Moorside Legal Court Case
DIR By: DWMB2
Date: February 17, 2026, 5:41 am
---------------------------------------------------------
We could ideally do with some more detail - which "paperwork" is
signed by John Moody?
As a more general point... Any flaws with the way they are
conducting the case can of course be pointed out to the judge,
but you should always prepare to argue the substantive points of
your defence. We have seen one case struck out where part of the
judges reasoning was that an unauthorised person was conducting
the litigation, was this raised in your defence?
#Post#: 110063--------------------------------------------------
Re: Another Moorside Legal Court Case
DIR By: MYKA
Date: February 17, 2026, 7:20 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Hi,
Unfortunately I have not included that point as part of my
defence as that was done before I got any of his emails.
Also my apologies it’s not the paperwork but the emails that I
received with the directions questionnaire and the reply to my
defence was from him. He was also the one to serve the
directions questionnaire on the court as per the email he
signed.
My defence as pointed out on this forum is based on the vague
poc and mainly that the PCN was not POFA compliant as lacks
evidence for the alleged contravention and no time period was
included just the issue time of the PCN.
Any questions just let me know.
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 1