DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 115404--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN - TFL hiked fine to £240! Code 62. No rejection email!
DIR By: tincombe
Date: April 9, 2026, 3:36 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I know it can be difficult!
#Post#: 115471--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN - TFL hiked fine to £240! Code 62. No rejection email!
DIR By: NorthernUpholder
Date: April 9, 2026, 12:28 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I don't know about TFL, but are we talking a combined PCN/NTO in
which case does the rejection of representation have to be
through the post.
#Post#: 115488--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN - TFL hiked fine to £240! Code 62. No rejection email!
DIR By: fraser.mitchell
Date: April 9, 2026, 5:33 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: NorthernUpholder link ---
>
> I don't know about TFL, but are we talking a combined PCN/NTO
in which case does the rejection of representation have to be
through the post.
>
--- End Quote ---
Yes, you should have received a letter in the post. But this is
irrelevant now, because you have submitted your TE9 and the
process will now be reverted to the stage of submission of reps.
TfL must then refer the matter to the adjudicator. Missing
letters now seem to be routine nowadays in this Great Britain of
the 21st century.
#Post#: 115557--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN - TFL hiked fine to £240! Code 62. No rejection email!
DIR By: Neil B
Date: April 10, 2026, 2:00 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Bladester link ---
>
> [quote author=Incandescent link=topic=9942.msg113704#msg113704
date=1773919753]
> Best to download the form, complete it and send it off. Mail
is too uncertain these days. PCN is under Traffic Management
Act, so you need the Witness Statement form.
>
--- End Quote ---
Hi Incandescent, sorry to be a pain... I downloaded form
already, but on the Witness statement section, do I just outline
what they've written or do I write the reason on a different
plain A4 sheet and add with the form? i/e:
•You paid the penalty charge notice in full. You must provide
details of the date payment was made,
the method of payment i.e. cash, cheque etc and who the payment
was made to. Please note you
may be asked to provide proof of payment upon request.
• You did not receive the notice to owner/penalty charge notice.
• You made representations about the penalty charge notice to
the Local Authority within 28 days of
service of the notice to owner but did not receive a reply
(rejection notice).
• You appealed against the Local Authority’s decision to reject
your representation within 28 days, but
you had no response to your appeal.
..And I assume it's the third paragraph i'm
highligting...correct?
Thanks again mate! Appreciate all the help!
[/quote]
NOOO!
You shouldn't outline anything, just tick the appropriate box -
which was the second one
You confused yourself and a member here by your flawed
terminology > "appealed"
and why didn't you e-mail the form instead of wasting time and
money on 'signed for'?
#Post#: 116089--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN - TFL hiked fine to £240! Code 62. No rejection email!
DIR By: Bladester
Date: April 16, 2026, 1:16 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Neil B link ---
>
> [quote author=Bladester link=topic=9942.msg113926#msg113926
date=1774092602]
> [quote author=Incandescent link=topic=9942.msg113704#msg113704
date=1773919753]
> Best to download the form, complete it and send it off. Mail
is too uncertain these days. PCN is under Traffic Management
Act, so you need the Witness Statement form.
>
--- End Quote ---
Hi Incandescent, sorry to be a pain... I downloaded form
already, but on the Witness statement section, do I just outline
what they've written or do I write the reason on a different
plain A4 sheet and add with the form? i/e:
•You paid the penalty charge notice in full. You must provide
details of the date payment was made,
the method of payment i.e. cash, cheque etc and who the payment
was made to. Please note you
may be asked to provide proof of payment upon request.
• You did not receive the notice to owner/penalty charge notice.
• You made representations about the penalty charge notice to
the Local Authority within 28 days of
service of the notice to owner but did not receive a reply
(rejection notice).
• You appealed against the Local Authority’s decision to reject
your representation within 28 days, but
you had no response to your appeal.
..And I assume it's the third paragraph i'm
highligting...correct?
Thanks again mate! Appreciate all the help!
[/quote]
NOOO!
You shouldn't outline anything, just tick the appropriate box -
which was the second one
You confused yourself and a member here by your flawed
terminology > "appealed"
and why didn't you e-mail the form instead of wasting time and
money on 'signed for'?
[/quote]
Hi Neil, I did tick the second box, and highlighted the section
appropriate on the otherside...(my bad).
I didn't email them because I didn't want them to say they never
received it, as they seem to have a lot of email errors! Anyway
they've definitely received it by signing for it of which I have
proof of receivership.
I've just checked the PCN website and it says this today:
16 April 2026 On Hold: SUS40 - Statutory Declaration Receipt
N/A
I'm assuming it'll now be reviewed.
#Post#: 116436--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN - TFL hiked fine to £240! Code 62. No rejection email!
DIR By: Bladester
Date: April 20, 2026, 8:49 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Received this today:
[img]
HTML https://imgpile.com/p/EuYDGTN[/img]
HTML https://imgpile.com/p/EuYDGTN
I'm assuming that it's reverted to original charge before
increase.
Thanks
#Post#: 116462--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN - TFL hiked fine to £240! Code 62. No rejection email!
DIR By: fraser.mitchell
Date: April 20, 2026, 10:26 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Bladester link ---
>
> Received this today:
>
> [img]
HTML https://imgpile.com/p/EuYDGTN[/img]
>
>
HTML https://imgpile.com/p/EuYDGTN
>
> I'm assuming that it's reverted to original charge before
increase.
>
> Thanks
>
--- End Quote ---
Yes, the Charge Certificate addition (50%) has been removed
because it is now cancelled. However the PCN remains extant. I
think you can also pay at the discounted rate too.
#Post#: 116872--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN - TFL hiked fine to £240! Code 62. No rejection email!
DIR By: Bladester
Date: April 24, 2026, 6:44 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Incandescent link ---
>
> [quote author=Bladester link=topic=9942.msg116436#msg116436
date=1776692965]
> Received this today:
>
> [img]
HTML https://imgpile.com/p/EuYDGTN[/img]
>
>
HTML https://imgpile.com/p/EuYDGTN
>
> I'm assuming that it's reverted to original charge before
increase.
>
> Thanks
>
--- End Quote ---
Yes, the Charge Certificate addition (50%) has been removed
because it is now cancelled. However the PCN remains extant. I
think you can also pay at the discounted rate too.
[/quote]
Afternoon Incandescent and one and all!
Checked the website today and still says £250, but letter said
they'll, (the original PCN senders), would get in contact... but
alas nothing as of yet. I hope they don't try to send just an
imaginary email again from their imaginary servers. Talk about
longing things out with these people!
#Post#: 116914--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN - TFL hiked fine to £240! Code 62. No rejection email!
DIR By: fraser.mitchell
Date: April 24, 2026, 1:59 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
What happens now is defined in law, TfL cannot just make it up.
If you had submitted representations, and failed to receive a
reply (rejection), then TfL must pass the matter to the
adjudicators at London Tribunals for a decision.
#Post#: 125799--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN - TFL hiked fine to £240! Code 62. No rejection email!
DIR By: Bladester
Date: July 26, 2026, 1:21 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Hi all, just an update on this case.
As Incandescent said, the case is now being represented to the
adjudicators at London Tribunals for a decision. I have to
make/prepare a defence and send by the 5th of August 2026. As
per normal, my defence will be the same as in the original with
the caveat of noticing that it seems there is a string of
instances on the internet whereby no email or letter have been
received by a string of individuals in similar circumstances and
this seems to be a malicious and callous intentions of TFL in a
bid to bully individuals into paying them the doubled/tripled
fines!!
Rather than accept that their is a fault with their systems,
basically it seems TFL cannot handle the shame of defeat in case
it stands as a precedent for upcoming cases.
I still believe that they do this on purpose with a bid to gain
more money in fines. I'm sure most people will believe they
missed the email or letter and just go ahead and pay the
inflated addition to the fine.
*****************************************************
Page 4 of 5
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page