DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 110438--------------------------------------------------
Re: Unlawful vehicle clamping
DIR By: igaren
Date: February 20, 2026, 2:31 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: cp8759 link ---
>
> I've highlighted the key paragraphs in bold:
>
> [quote author=igaren link=topic=9909.msg110170#msg110170
date=1771406808]
> Further to the above, Newlyn PLC will endeavour to investigate
all new keeper claims as we have a duty of care to our clients
to ensure that all feasible steps have been carried out. Newlyn
PLC have now reviewed your claim on controlled goods for and on
behalf of our client, the creditor, as per our agreement with
them to handle these matters and we are not satisfied that the
information and documentation you have provided is sufficient.
The reasons are as follows:
>
> 1. A copy of the V5 Logbook issued by the DVLA. – Provided.
(Please note that this alone does not prove ownership.)
>
> 2. A copy of a valid Insurance Certificate for the vehicle
which must be purchased on the date of purchase. – Not Provided.
>
> a. If you are in possession of motor traders insurance, the
MID list showing the vehicle was added to the policy must also
be provided
>
> b. In the absence of a valid insurance certificate a DVLA SORN
confirmation is required
> 3. A valid receipt for the purchase. – Not Provided.
>
> 4. Evidence of the flow of money used for the purchase of the
vehicle, for example a bank statement. – Not Provided.
>
> 5. Evidence of how the vehicle was obtained, for example a
copy of the advertisement. – Not provided.
>
> 6. Evidence of the purchase of Vehicle Tax.- Not Provided
>
> Based on the evidence seen to date, your claim is disputed
under CPR 85. As the Warrant of Control has been fully
discharged and we no longer have control of any goods, we are
unable to take any further enforcement action in respect of the
vehicle.
>
> Nevertheless, and without any admission of liability, we have
reviewed the documentation you have subsequently provided in
support of your position. Having done so, we are not satisfied
that the evidence produced establishes ownership of the vehicle
at the relevant time. The documentation provided lacks
credibility and does not, on the balance of probabilities,
support your claim.
>
> Based on the evidence seen to date, your claim is disputed
under CPR 85. If you are in any doubt as to your position, you
should seek independent legal advice as a matter of urgency. Any
legal action taken against Newlyn PLC, our creditor or our
Enforcement Agent will be taken very seriously and vigorously
defended. If we are successful in defending any claim made, we
will seek to recover our wasted costs of doing so through a
costs order of the Court. We reserve the right to show this
email to the Court in the event that you take legal proceedings
against Newlyn PLC or our creditor.
>
> Next Steps
>
> Unfortunately, we cannot refund you the sum of £560.00 as
requested as you have not provided us with satisfactory evidence
to support your claim under CPR 85. However, we are open to
further reviewing the matter should you be able to supply
further evidence.
>
> Please provide this information at your earliest convenience
so we can assist you further.
> I appreciate that this may not be the response you were hoping
for, but I am satisfied that we have acted lawfully and
appropriately at all times and reasonably given the
circumstances.
>
--- End Quote ---
Their response seems very reasonable and sensible and may well
go above and beyond what they are required to do. Why don't you
simply provide them what they have asked for? They don't need to
provide PCN, charge certificate or anything else because the PCN
has obviously nothing to do with you, so frankly it's none of
your business.
If this was a genuine purchase, you'd expect to see evidence of
the insurance, vehicle tax payment and so on, why don't you just
provide them all of that? It sounds like they'll refund the
money if you do.
Also I suggest you stop using the quote function as you
obviously aren't able to use it as intended, and it's making
your posts almost impossible to follow.
Morning
Thank you for your email and comment
I have provided proof of Insurance taken since Sep- V5 log
bookd, Bank statement clearly showing name of the seller,
agreement document made by seller explaining that Car wont be
mine until all paymentent settle, receipt of road tax paid in
DEC- still they refused to refund.
REason:
The documentation you have subsequently provided states that the
vehicle was purchased from Mr SA. This information is
inconsistent with the details previously given to our agent and
does not correspond with the information held by the DVLA or
referenced on the Warrant of Control. [u]( I THOUGHT V5 DOES NOT
PROVE THAT YOU ARE THE OWNER)
A car sale agreement and transaction payment details you have
provided; however, we are unable to verify the authenticity or
genuineness of these documents ( IT WAS A GENUINE BANK
STATEMENT)
The bank statement provided shows a payment made to SA on 22
December; however, this payment cannot be linked to the
registered keeper of the vehicle or verify the owner of the
vehicle.
The vehicle tax receipt indicates a purchase date that does not
align with the insurance document
[AGREEMENT PAPER PRODUCE BY SELLER IN SEP CLEARLY SPECIFY THAT
CAR WONT BE HANDED OVER UNTIL FULL PAYMENT MADE WHICH WAS
COMPLETED IN SEP- WHEN ROAD TAX WAS PURCHASE AND V5 CHANGED)
Thanks
#Post#: 110722--------------------------------------------------
Re: Unlawful vehicle clamping
DIR By: ivanleo
Date: February 22, 2026, 6:13 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[member=8322]igaren[/member] honestly I think you just need
someone to handle this for you, it doesn't look like it would be
that difficult. See if [member=7]mrmustard[/member] has
capacity.
#Post#: 110728--------------------------------------------------
Re: Unlawful vehicle clamping
DIR By: mrmustard
Date: February 23, 2026, 12:45 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Sorry I don't have capacity as I picked up a major project two
weeks ago and have £6m+ of debts to argue about and try to
collect.
We usually recommend
HTML https://bailiffadviceonline.co.uk/
#Post#: 110744--------------------------------------------------
Re: Unlawful vehicle clamping
DIR By: fraser.mitchell
Date: February 23, 2026, 4:49 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: mrmustard link ---
>
> Sorry I don't have capacity as I picked up a major project two
weeks ago and have £6m+ of debts to argue about and try to
collect.
>
> We usually recommend
HTML https://bailiffadviceonline.co.uk/
>
--- End Quote ---
+1
#Post#: 117644--------------------------------------------------
Re: Unlawful vehicle clamping
DIR By: igaren
Date: May 3, 2026, 9:19 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Dear All
Following continued perseverance and escalation of my complaint
to Stage 2, the bailiff has now refunded the full amount.
Thanks
#Post#: 117662--------------------------------------------------
Re: Unlawful vehicle clamping
DIR By: ManxTom
Date: May 3, 2026, 2:13 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Did you resolve it yourself or did bailiffadviceonline help you?
#Post#: 117683--------------------------------------------------
Re: Unlawful vehicle clamping
DIR By: igaren
Date: May 3, 2026, 4:12 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Hi
No I resolve it myself
Bailiff Advice Online was not very helpful. After reviewing my
case, the adviser told me that I had no realistic chance of
success. Despite this, I decided to continue the case because I
believed I was standing up for my rights.
After discussing my case with her i have the impression that she
was on their side than mine
Anyway its all sorted
thanks
*****************************************************
Page 2 of 2
DIR Previous Page