URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 109552--------------------------------------------------
       Smart Parking Deliberate Scam
       By: JimmyJ Date: February 12, 2026, 2:36 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi all,
       So my wife has received a Final Reminder from Smart Parking Ltd,
       demanding £145 and stating we ignored the initial letter. Well
       the fact is we never received the initial letter, it never
       arrived at the same address the Final Reminder did.
       So far i've done two things, one requested the formal complaints
       procedure for the shopping retail park, and i've tried to
       contact Smart Parking for their formal complaints procedure.
       No names other than my own have been given to SP.
       Now surely they've removed the right to appeal and the right to
       pay the initial lower fine, that must be a breach of their own
       procedure, and obviously I am not paying the elevated fine
       because this is a tactic, from what I am reading on other sites,
       Smart Parking use.
       Also, there is a caveat, the car that would have been caught, we
       no longer have. lol but I am sure they would trace it via the
       DVLA. We part ex'd it a few weeks back.
       They are threatening court action if we ignore the letter etc,
       which I was expecting etc, but any guidance to how their lack of
       care can be used against them would be appreciated.
       I find it absolutely disgusting that in a big shopping area,
       where there are god knows how many shops, my wife went there to
       do all the Christmas shopping , and went over the "free"
       allowance, which I also find disgusting as that centre always
       used to be free, we don't go there from year to year, now has
       this vile smart parking system in place, and she gets this
       treatment. Can't enjoy anything at your own pace anymore.
       Anyway, thanks in advance.
       #Post#: 109558--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Smart Parking Deliberate Scam
       By: RichardW Date: February 12, 2026, 4:56 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       You can send a complaint to Smart, which they are required to
       treat as an appeal.  Something along the lines of disputing
       their charge as the reg keeper and they have not delivered a
       Notice to Keeper as required by POFA to transfer liability.
       Don't identify the driver.  You can request that they send on
       the original PCN with proof of posting.  They will most likely
       reject the appeal without really reading it, and they look to be
       IPC so secondary appeal will be to IAS (which will also most
       likely reject it).
       After that you are waiting out the debt collectors letters and
       the court claim, which is often discontinued as long as you
       defend it.
       If you are a genuine customer, then going via the retailer might
       yield a cancellation, but it's often difficult on a multi store
       retail park.  Where was it?
       It's not a fine, BTW, but a speculative invoice for alleged
       breach of contract.
       If you get the original PCN post it up, there may be flaws that
       mean there is an easy defence.
       #Post#: 109564--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Smart Parking Deliberate Scam
       By: DWMB2 Date: February 12, 2026, 5:19 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Welcome to FTLA.
       A quick preliminary matter, which may sound pedantic, but isn't
       - from a legal perspective there is no "we" in this case. If
       your wife was the registered keeper of the vehicle at the time,
       and the letter(s) are addressed to her, then the dispute is
       between her and Smart, so anything formal will need to be done
       in her name. I mention this now at the start because we've seen
       cases where people are trying to help a friend/relative, and end
       up inadvertently making things worse by submitting court
       defences in their own name etc.
       #Post#: 109567--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Smart Parking Deliberate Scam
       By: JimmyJ Date: February 12, 2026, 5:35 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I haven't mentioned wife or me , I just used the term we, which
       could refer to me or anyone tbh. As I lodged the complaint with
       them, they , i'd assume , would be obliged to reply to me. In
       fact, reviewing the email I sent, it infers I am the one fined
       and keeper, therefore with not reference to the letter or any
       reference numbers, they must ask me for that first, so far they
       haven't replied at all.
       If they wished to rectify the issue with the "appeal / lower
       fine amount" they'd ask for the PCN.
       The email was deliberately vague tbh, I just want initial
       contact. If they don't respond.
       But also, I might add, the reason I do the emails is that
       English is not my wifes first language, so it's easier for me to
       do all correspondence.
       #Post#: 109568--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Smart Parking Deliberate Scam
       By: DWMB2 Date: February 12, 2026, 5:41 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=JimmyJ link=topic=9891.msg109567#msg109567
       date=1770896112]
       But also, I might add, the reason I do the emails is that
       English is not my wifes first language, so it's easier for me to
       do all correspondence.
       [/quote]
       I appreciate that, my point is just to make sure you're aware
       that if this proceeds to a court claim (which, with Smart
       Parking, is a fair possibility), then all court
       submissions/correspondence etc. will need to be in your wife's
       name, as she will be the defendant.
       #Post#: 109581--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Smart Parking Deliberate Scam
       By: JimmyJ Date: February 12, 2026, 7:07 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Oh yeah 100% anything Official I will use her name. Just so far
       it's been in mine as they don't know who they are talking about
       yet.
       Plus I want to see if they actually reply or not. So far,
       nothing
       #Post#: 109652--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Smart Parking Deliberate Scam
       By: roythebus Date: February 12, 2026, 5:47 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Make sure you don't name who was driving at the time, no 'I",
       "we", "us". Just "the driver".
       #Post#: 109662--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Smart Parking Deliberate Scam
       By: JimmyJ Date: February 13, 2026, 1:13 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       We don't even have that car anymore lol But I know they could
       trace it via the DVLA.
       But yeah I won't state who was driving.
       I will repeat the emails to their info and complaint email
       addresses they give on their site, if they don't reply, I shall
       ignore any further communication and await the court case.
       2 attempts to communicate and being ignored is reason enough to
       get the fine thrown out. They deliberately blocked the right to
       appeal and right to pay the lesser charge. And two people
       willing to testify that the original letter never arrived and
       they refused to resend it with proof of postage.
       #Post#: 109665--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Smart Parking Deliberate Scam
       By: DWMB2 Date: February 13, 2026, 2:55 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote] 2 attempts to communicate and being ignored is reason
       enough to get the fine thrown out [/quote]
       If it gets to court, you'll need more than that (especially when
       the attempts to communicate were made by a third party and not
       the defendant). It's evidence of potential unreasonable
       behaviour on their part, but doesn't on its own relate to the
       alleged contractual charges Smart claim are due.
       That the notice wasn't received is potentially a stronger point,
       of course.
       If the shopping centre is local to you, I would advise getting
       some photos of the signage, especially if it is not prominent.
       You mention that it used to be free without limit - if so, check
       if there are any prominent signs advising that the terms have
       changed. Both of these could also work in your favour.
       #Post#: 109670--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Smart Parking Deliberate Scam
       By: JimmyJ Date: February 13, 2026, 4:35 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=DWMB2 link=topic=9891.msg109665#msg109665
       date=1770972900]
       [quote]2 attempts to communicate and being ignored is reason
       enough to get the fine thrown out [/quote]
       If it gets to court, you'll need more than that (especially when
       the attempts to communicate were made by a third party and not
       the defendant). It's evidence of potential unreasonable
       behaviour on their part, but doesn't on its own relate to the
       alleged contractual charges Smart claim are due.
       [/quote]
       This I would disagree with. Third party or not, they do not know
       who the driver was, what the PCN was, and they should reply
       asking for these details. Their own procedures are to issue
       initial fine, offer opportunity to pay lesser fine in 28 days or
       appeal. This was not given by SP, therefore breach of their own
       contract. Obviously it's their word against ours , they can say
       the letter was sent, but we both would deny this. But it
       wouldn't explain why they completely ignored repeated emails to
       their highlighted addresses were ignored. Companies have a duty
       to answer official complaints within a certain timeframe, and in
       this case with the details , re-issue the original letter and
       allow for the 28 day appeal or pay the reduced fine. They simply
       cannot ignore that and just send out final reminders stating we
       ignored a non existent letter. Also, again, doesn't explain
       ignoring the emails requesting the initial letter.
       There will be no appeal or fight, the £60 will be paid as there
       is another issue regarding mental health here. If this goes on,
       it will have an extreme effect on someones mental health (They
       are ill anyway) and that can be catastrophic long term. But the
       £145 and any further demands will not be paid.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page