URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 109104--------------------------------------------------
       Manchester City Council - Parked without a valid permit Code 12
   DIR By: LongTimeLurker
       Date: February 8, 2026, 12:22 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Good afternoon,
       I recently received a PCN on Banff Street in Manchester.  I
       believe this specific street has actually been covered before.
  HTML https://imgpile.com/p/cjP1mu8
       The area in question is covered by the Rusholme and Moss Side
       Past this Point Permit Scheme.  This scheme, as per the councils
       website, doesn't offer paper permits - only digital ones - and
       there is no option to Pay and Display at this location.
       The PCN I received was listed as 'Code 12 - Parked in a
       residents or shared use parking place without clearly displaying
       either a permit or voucher or pay and display ticket'.
       This differs from the governments own definition of Code 12
       which includes digital permits.
       I challenged the PCN on the grounds of them requiring something
       which wasn't possible - no valid permit can be clearly displayed
       if they are not supplied, nor can a P&D ticket be purchased.
       The rejection I have received states that I was given a PCN for
       failing to display either a valid permit or e-permit, but this
       different from what is stated on the PCN.
       A technicality I know, but they make the rules and should abide
       by them... any route to follow here?
       Thank you
       #Post#: 109124--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Manchester City Council - Parked without a valid permit Code
       12
   DIR By: stamfordman
       Date: February 8, 2026, 4:09 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Another point is the entry sign just says permit and doesn't
       mention residents so a code 16 is accurate.
       Why did you park there.
       You are right about the contravention description - I'll see if
       I can find a case to back it up.
  HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/cvTzJMuF6urc2Ryx8
       #Post#: 109164--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Manchester City Council - Parked without a valid permit Code
       12
   DIR By: LongTimeLurker
       Date: February 9, 2026, 4:44 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thank you.  There is a slight difference in the picture of the
       sign they admitted as evidence vs the Street View image - on
       Street View the 'past this point' appears to have been covered,
       but neither has any mention of residents.
       No reason of relevance for parking in that location.
       Both of the below are relevant in terms of location and
       contravention, but neither seems to have a clear outcome of any
       help.
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/pcn-manchester-hibbert-street-code-12/msg31351/#msg31351
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/manchester-city-council-code-12-parked-in-a-'permit-parking-zone'-but-sign-block/msg41591/#msg41591
       #Post#: 109230--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Manchester City Council - Parked without a valid permit Code
       12
   DIR By: stamfordman
       Date: February 9, 2026, 11:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       A case in point. The code 12 vs 16 is also relevant as there's
       no resident permit on entry sign.
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WW83Desv43qE8aviq2wez1KRsivNCqME/view
       I find, therefore, that, although a contravention did occur on
       this occasion because
       Mr Russo had paid for a parking session for the wrong car, the
       contravention alleged in the PCN did not occur because there was
       no requirement to, and it was not possible to, display a valid
       virtual pay & display ticket, even if Mr Russo had obtained one.
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/Fkq53Drm/m3.jpg
  HTML https://ibb.co/cKX63rBk
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/8gcnynCw/m2.jpg
  HTML https://ibb.co/d4gsNsTv
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/kgZTVXn2/m1.jpg
  HTML https://ibb.co/Fbp1kzv4
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1