URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 108547--------------------------------------------------
       Hammersmith & Fulham - 01: Parked in a restricted street,
       Great Church Lane, W6 - INITIAL APPEAL REJ
   DIR By: sjcuk7
       Date: February 3, 2026, 9:57 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Having thought my case was pretty strong I didn't post the PCN
       recieved back on 27/12/25 here.
       I've now had my appeal rejected, though the grounds given show
       they're either quietly ignoring my main point or completely
       missed it.
       Here's my appeal, indicating why I think their signage is
       inadequate.....
       "On the evening in question I drove into Hammersmith from the
       Chiswick side of the A4, I note there is a Controlled Zone sign
       under the flyover just off the A road. I entered the Broadway
       one way system onto Queen Caroline Street and drove around and
       down Butterwick, at the bottom of Butterwick.
       As I turned into Talgarth Road there is a very clear Zone Ends
       sign. Driving along Talgarth Road and turning into Shortlands
       there is absolutely no signage to suggest I was entering a
       Controlled Zone, furthermore at the entrance to Great Church
       Lane there is absolutely no indication of any restriction timing
       via a yellow plate at either end of the road.
       Without indication to tell me I parked on the yellow lines to
       the left as the road was completely clear and all information
       available to me at the time suggested I could do so after
       6.30pm. I have since seen the signage for the adjacent parking
       bays which are clearly enforcing the bays and not the road
       itself, as they are pay and display/permit signs, which are not
       an indication for yellow lines. Obviously any double yellow
       lines are entirely restricted all the time, which is why I
       parked where I did."
       Their response completely sidestep the Zone Ends sign clearly
       visible turning left onto the Talgarth Road....
       "The vehicle was in a controlled parking zone A. Restrictions in
       that zone apply from 08:30 to 23:00, Monday to Sunday. There are
       signs at the entrances to the zone that show the controlled
       hours. Single yellow lines within the zone apply during the same
       hours as the zone, unless they have a separate sign showing
       different times.
       The PCN was issued on the date and at the time above on a single
       yellow line which applied until 23:00. During a period of 9
       minutes no activity was seen at the vehicle.
       I have noted your comments in regard to the signage. Our records
       and inspections confirm that at least one compliant CPZ entry
       sign was visible on the route into the CPZ covering Great Church
       Lane. The absence of a time-plate adjacent to the single yellow
       line does not constitute a defect where the restriction aligns
       with CPZ hours already conveyed via entry signage.
       Within a CPZ, individual yellow lines do not need separate time
       plates, as the operational hours are clearly displayed on signs
       at all entry points to the zone, in accordance with the Traffic
       Signs Regulations and General Directions 2016. Motorists are
       expected to check and comply with the information displayed on
       these CPZ entry signs when entering the area."
       They go on to show an example of a Controlled Zone sign and to
       further comment...
       "Drivers should not assume the restrictions. If you are unsure
       about the restrictions in place, please find alternative
       parking. The onus is always on the driver to ensure their
       vehicle is parked ‘legally’ and in compliance at all
       times.
       As the above vehicle was parked in contravention, this Council
       cannot find any valid reason to waive the Charge.
       My decision - I have considered what you have said and all the
       available evidence, but I do not agree that we should cancel
       your liability for this PCN."
       Here is the original PCN,
  HTML https://imgpile.com/p/DBdQKzI
       Is it worth me taking this further? Why have they failed to
       acknowledge the part of my appeal referencing the Zone End sign?
       #Post#: 108550--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hammersmith & Fulham - 01: Parked in a restricted
       street, Great Church Lane, W6 - INITIAL APPEAL
   DIR By: sjcuk7
       Date: February 3, 2026, 10:20 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Here's the picture I sent H&F Council, showing their Zone Ends
       sign, visible turning from Butterwick into Talgarth Road.
  HTML https://imgpile.com/p/n8MGEoo
       [img]
  HTML https://imgpile.com/p/n8MGEoo[/img]
       #Post#: 108551--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hammersmith & Fulham - 01: Parked in a restricted
       street, Great Church Lane, W6 - INITIAL APPEAL
   DIR By: sjcuk7
       Date: February 3, 2026, 10:26 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Here's the approach to Great Church Lane, the oval shaped, white
       ringed building, is on the corner of it.
       NOTE: The lack of any Controlled Zone signage.
  HTML https://imgpile.com/p/WC9FxUp
       [img width=600]
  HTML https://imgpile.com/p/WC9FxUp[/img]
       #Post#: 108552--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hammersmith & Fulham - 01: Parked in a restricted
       street, Great Church Lane, W6 - INITIAL APPEAL REJ
   DIR By: sjcuk7
       Date: February 3, 2026, 10:31 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Finally here's a view of Great Church Lane itself, on the
       evening in question the car was parked on the single yellow
       line, alongside the white wall, seen in the picture.
  HTML https://imgpile.com/p/LeTNW14
       [img width=600]
  HTML https://imgpile.com/p/LeTNW14[/img]
       #Post#: 108553--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hammersmith & Fulham - 01: Parked in a restricted
       street, Great Church Lane, W6 - INITIAL APPEAL
   DIR By: sjcuk7
       Date: February 3, 2026, 10:45 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       To aid understanding of the location, I'm including a grab from
       Google Maps showing the Controlled Zone Sign (1), the Zone Ends
       sign (2), the parking spot (3) and highlighting the direction of
       travel taken.
  HTML https://imgpile.com/p/0NcvnLE
       [img width=600]
  HTML https://imgpile.com/p/0NcvnLE[/img]
       #Post#: 108556--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hammersmith & Fulham - 01: Parked in a restricted
       street, Great Church Lane, W6 - INITIAL APPEAL REJ
   DIR By: John U.K.
       Date: February 3, 2026, 11:21 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Have you traced your route on the zoomable map of the zones
       here?
  HTML https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/viewer?mid=19Azi5jTTEnWfrjOLNqy-CG5btpw21Q_6&ll=51.49180023721487%2C-0.22000470589989218&z=18
       Also
  HTML https://www.lbhf.gov.uk/parking/pay-and-display/map-controlled-parking-zones
       As far as I could work out, this sign (end of Zone A)
  HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/GfwBL16W3fSjKBEH8
       should be accompanied by a sign for the beginning of Zone D.
       This short entry to Shortlands Road and Great Church Lane
  HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/Uu8CofWFMnYAbiu78
       and
  HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/3x9419mTcgVwK3sj7
       Should have end of Zone D with on the both sides entrance to
       Zone A.
       I think you have a good case on the absence of signage on the
       wiggly boundary between A and D, but see what the experts say.
       After diligently searching for signage for the SYL on which you
       parked, eyebrows might be raised at any thoughts you may have
       had that you were in inner London and yet were not in a zone.
       #Post#: 108564--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hammersmith & Fulham - 01: Parked in a restricted
       street, Great Church Lane, W6 - INITIAL APPEAL
   DIR By: sjcuk7
       Date: February 3, 2026, 11:55 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: John U.K. link ---
       >
       >
       > Have you traced your route on the zoomable map of the zones
       here?
       >
  HTML https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/viewer?mid=19Azi5jTTEnWfrjOLNqy-CG5btpw21Q_6&ll=51.49180023721487%2C-0.22000470589989218&z=18
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Yes, but only since. It was my wife who was driving and she is
       not from Hammersmith and is quite used to 6.30pm unless stated
       on a sign
       --- Quote from: John U.K. link ---
       >
       > Also
       >
  HTML https://www.lbhf.gov.uk/parking/pay-and-display/map-controlled-parking-zones
       >
       >
       >
       > As far as I could work out, this sign (end of Zone A)
       >
  HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/GfwBL16W3fSjKBEH8
       >
       > should be accompanied by a sign for the beginning of Zone D.
       >
       > This short entry to Shortlands Road and Great Church Lane
       >
  HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/Uu8CofWFMnYAbiu78
       > and
       >
  HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/3x9419mTcgVwK3sj7
       > Should have end of Zone D with on the both sides entrance to
       Zone A.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Thanks for the info. At the time my wife's phone was out of
       battery and the onus surely should not be put on having internet
       connectivity while parking!
       --- Quote from: John U.K. link ---
       >
       > I think you have a good case on the absence of signage on the
       wiggly boundary between A and D, but see what the experts say.
       >
       > After diligently searching for signage for the SYL on which
       you parked, eyebrows might be raised at any thoughts you may
       have had that you were in inner London and yet were not in a
       zone.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Without an actual Controlled Zone at that junction how does
       anyone who lives outside London have a hope of knowing that the
       parking restrictions differ from the rest of the country?
       The last sign she saw literally said Zone Ends!
       #Post#: 108568--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hammersmith & Fulham - 01: Parked in a restricted
       street, Great Church Lane, W6 - INITIAL APPEAL REJ
   DIR By: John U.K.
       Date: February 3, 2026, 12:10 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote ---
       > Thanks for the info. At the time my wife's phone was out of
       battery and the onus surely should not be put on having internet
       connectivity while parking!
       --- End Quote ---
       I hope I asn't suggesting  she should have to search online,
       merely trying to strengthen your case at the next stage.
       Incidentally, could you please post copies of correpondence
       rather than transcripts, beginning with all sides of the
       rejection letter, redacting only yr name & address. (Material
       often gets lost or corrupted in transcription - e.g. the all
       important dates.)
       Are you the registered keeper and is your V5C address correct in
       every particular, as the NtO will go to the RK at that address?
       #Post#: 108575--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hammersmith & Fulham - 01: Parked in a restricted
       street, Great Church Lane, W6 - INITIAL APPEAL REJ
   DIR By: sjcuk7
       Date: February 3, 2026, 1:02 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: John U.K. link ---
       >
       > [quote]Thanks for the info. At the time my wife's phone was
       out of battery and the onus surely should not be put on having
       internet connectivity while parking!
       --- End Quote ---
       I hope I asn't suggesting  she should have to search online,
       merely trying to strengthen your case at the next stage.
       Incidentally, could you please post copies of correpondence
       rather than transcripts, beginning with all sides of the
       rejection letter, redacting only yr name & address. (Material
       often gets lost or corrupted in transcription - e.g. the all
       important dates.)
       Are you the registered keeper and is your V5C address correct in
       every particular, as the NtO will go to the RK at that address?
       [/quote]
       As luck would have it, in this case, I AM the RK of the vehicle
       my wife was driving. The rejection letter was emailed as an
       attachment. Here's a link to it in full (three pages worth).
  HTML https://imgpile.com/p/xmjGVQo
       [img width=600]
  HTML https://imgpile.com/p/xmjGVQo[/img]
       #Post#: 108601--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hammersmith & Fulham - 01: Parked in a restricted
       street, Great Church Lane, W6 - INITIAL APPEAL REJ
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: February 3, 2026, 4:00 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       If you want to take the matter further, it is essential you find
       out whether there is a missing sign for the CPZ. If the council
       can show, at adjudication, that you passed a CPZ sign, then
       you'd lose.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 3
   DIR Next Page